Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 369–387

Sensory consciousness explained (better) in terms of ‘corporality’ and ‘alerting capacity’



How could neural processes be associated with phenomenal consciousness? We present a way to answer this question by taking the counterintuitive stance that the sensory feel of an experience is not a thing that happens to us, but a thing we do: a skill we exercise. By additionally noting that sensory systems possess two important, objectively measurable properties, corporality and alerting capacity, we are able to explain why sensory experience possesses a sensory feel, but thinking and other mental processes do not. We are additionally able to explain why different sensory feels differ in the way they do.

Key words

qualia consciousness sensorimotor skill sensation action 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bach-y-Rita, P. 1967. Sensory plasticity. Applications to a vision substitution system. Acta Neurol Scand. 43(4): 417–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bompas, A. and O’Regan, J. K. in press. Evidence for a role of action in color vision. Perception.Google Scholar
  3. Bompas, A., Clark, J. and O’Regan, J. K. 2002. Color perception in the sensorimotor contingency theory. Perception 31: 90–90.Google Scholar
  4. Block, N. 2001. Paradox and cross purposes in recent work on consciousness. Cognition 79: 197–219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Botvinick, M. and Cohen, J. 1998. Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see [letter]. Nature 391: 6669: 756.Google Scholar
  6. Crick, F. and Koch, C. 1990. Toward a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences 2: 263–275.Google Scholar
  7. Edelman, G. M. 1989. The Remembered Present. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Hameroff, S. R. 1994. Quantum coherence in microtubules: A neural basis for emergent consciousness? Journal of Consciousness Studies 1: 91–118.Google Scholar
  9. Hurley, S. L and Noë, A. 2003. Neural plasticity and consciousness. Biology and Philosophy 18: 131–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Levine, J. 1983. Materialism and qualia: The explanatory gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64: 354–361.Google Scholar
  11. Meijer, P. B. L. 1992. An experimental system for auditory image representations. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39(2): 112–121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1945/1976. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  13. Myin, E. and O’Regan, J. K. 2002. Perceptual consciousness, access to modality, and skill theories. Journal of Consciousness Studies 9(1): 27–45.Google Scholar
  14. O’Regan, J. K. and Noë, A. 2001a. Acting out our sensory experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2(5): 955–975.Google Scholar
  15. O’Regan, J. K. and Noë, A. 2001b. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(5): 883–917.Google Scholar
  16. Philipona, D. and O’Regan, J. K. in press. Color naming, unique hues and hue cancellation predicted from singularities in reflection properties. Visual Neuroscience.Google Scholar
  17. Penrose, R. 1994. Shadows of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. B. J. Richardson, B. L. and Frost, B. J. 1977. Sensory substitution and the design of an artificial ear. J. Psychol. 96 (2nd Half): 259–285.Google Scholar
  19. Sampaio, E. Maris, S. and Bach-y-Rita, P. 2001. Brain plasticity: ‘visual’ acuity of blind persons via the tongue. Brain Res. 908(2): 204–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Singer, W. 1993. Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 55: 349–374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Thomas, N. 1999. Are theories of imagery theories of imagination? An active perception approach to conscious mental content. Cognitive Science 23: 207–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thomas, N. 2001. Color realism: Toward a solution to the ‘hard problem’. Consciousness and Cognition 10: 140–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Veraart, C., Cremieux, J. and Wanet-Defalque. 1992. Use of an ultrasonic echolocation prosthesis by early visually deprived cats. Behav Neurosci 106(1): 203–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Centre National de Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité Paris 5 René DescartesParisFrance
  2. 2.Centre for Philosophical Psychology, Department of PhilosophyUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpenBelgium
  3. 3.Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Department of PhilosophyVUBBrusselBelgium
  4. 4.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyCA

Personalised recommendations