Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Perceptions of medicine use among pregnant women: an interview-based study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background When women are in a condition that requires medicines during pregnancy they have to balance the health benefits of the medical treatment against the potential risk of harming their unborn child. Too high teratogenic risk perceptions among pregnant women can lead them to stop taking the medicine, worsening the symptoms for the mother and even harming their foetus. Many women today who use over-the-counter and prescribed medicines have been shown to change their medical behaviour when they become pregnant. Objective To explore in depth the perceptions of medication use among women during their pregnancy. Setting The Capital Region of Denmark. Methods Participants were recruited from social network groups on Facebook and from participants in lectures and antenatal classes for pregnant women in two hospitals. Two focus groups interviews and three individual semi-structured interviews were conducted. The interview guides were based on existing literature and relatively unstructured, with an emphasis on open-ended questions. Interview transcripts were analysed using the phenomenological approach of meaning condensation. Main Outcome measure Pregnant women’s’ perceptions of medicine including aspects related to their safety feeling of medicines and perceived support from health care professionals. Results The women believed that it is less safe to take medicines during pregnancy, largely due to the risk of the child getting a disease in the future, but also due to the risk of malformation. Lack of clinical tests and uncertainty about how the unborn child reacts to medications were reported causes of these concerns. Most participants were concerned about using medicines and avoided them if possible, including over-the counter medicines. Conversations with physicians had a calming effect although the physicians appeared to be unclear in their guidance regarding dietary supplements. Some women received conflicting information on the Internet. Several suggestions were made about how to reduce uncertainties about the safety of taking medicines during pregnancy. Conclusion Many pregnant women are concerned about how to use medicines. To reduce these concerns and ensure the appropriate use of medicines during pregnancy, initiatives are needed to strengthen evidence-based advice from health care professionals, especially during the first trimester.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zaki NM, Albarraq AA. Use, attitudes and knowledge of medications among pregnant women: a Saudi study. Saudi Pharm J. 2014;22(5):419–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Twigg MJ, Lupattelli A, Nordeng H. Women’s beliefs about medication use during their pregnancy: a UK perspective. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(4):968–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Nordeng H, Koren G, Einarson A. Pregnant women’s beliefs about medications—a study among 866 Norwegian women. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44(9):1478–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mulder B, Bijlsma MJ, Schuiling-Veninga CC, Morssink LP, van Puijenbroek E, Aarnoudse JG, et al. Risks versus benefits of medication use during pregnancy: what do women perceive? Patient Prefer Adher. 2018;12:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Csajka C, Jaquet A, Winterfeld U, Meyer Y, Einarson A, Panchaud A. Risk perception by healthcare professionals related to drug use during pregnancy: a Swiss survey. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w13936.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Widnes SF, Schjott J, Eide GE, Granas AG. Teratogenic risk perception and confidence in use of medicines in pairs of pregnant women and general practitioners based on patient information leaflets. Drug Saf. 2013;36(6):481–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petersen I, McCrea RL, Sammon CJ, Osborn DP, Evans SJ, Cowen PJ, et al. Risks and benefits of psychotropic medication in pregnancy: cohort studies based on UK electronic primary care health records. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(23):1–176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Petersen I, McCrea RL, Osborn DJ, Evans S, Pinfold V, Cowen PJ, et al. Discontinuation of antipsychotic medication in pregnancy: a cohort study. Schizophr Res. 2014;159(1):218–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Petersen I, Gilbert RE, Evans SJ, Man SL, Nazareth I. Pregnancy as a major determinant for discontinuation of antidepressants: an analysis of data from The Health Improvement Network. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(7):979–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lupattelli A, Spigset O, Nordeng H. Adherence to medication for chronic disorders during pregnancy: results from a multinational study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36(1):145–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koren G. The way women perceive teratogenic risk. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;14(1):e10–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gentile S. Untreated depression during pregnancy: short- and long-term effects in offspring. A systematic review. Neuroscience. 2017;342:154–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen LS. Graviditet og Medicin. Jordemoderforeningen. 2013. http://www.jordemoderforeningen.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/nyhed/artikel/graviditet-og-medicin/. Accessed 04 Dec 2018.

  14. Hospital B. Om TrygMor. Bispebjerg Hospital. https://www.bispebjerghospital.dk/afdelinger-og-klinikker/klinisk-farmakologisk-afdeling/om-afdelingen/tryg_mor/omtrygmor/Sider/default.aspx. Accessed 04 Dec 2018.

  15. Nordeng H, Ystrom E, Einarson A. Perception of risk regarding the use of medications and other exposures during pregnancy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;66(2):207–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Petersen I, McCrea RL, Lupattelli A, Nordeng H. Women’s perception of risks of adverse fetal pregnancy outcomes: a large-scale multinational survey. BMJ Open. 2015;5(6):e007390.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Widnes SF, Schjott J. Risk perception regarding drug use in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(4):375–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sanz E, Gomez-Lopez T, Martinez-Quintas MJ. Perception of teratogenic risk of common medicines. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;95(1):127–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J. 2008;204(6):291–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaae S, Traulsen J. Qualitative methods in pharmacy practice research. In: Babar ZUD, editor. Pharmacy practice research methods. Adis/Springer: Cham; 2015. p. 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rabiee F. Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004;63(4):655–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kvale S. Methods of analysis. In: Kvale S, editor. Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 1996. p. 187–209.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vargesson N. Thalidomide-induced teratogenesis: history and mechanisms. Birth Defects Res Part C Embryo Today Rev. 2015;105(2):140–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Information til gravide. Sundhedsstyrelsen. 2018. https://www.sst.dk/da/sundhed-og-livsstil/graviditet-og-foedsel/information-til-gravide. Accessed 26 Feb 2019.

  26. McDonald K, Amir LH, Davey MA. Maternal bodies and medicines: a commentary on risk and decision-making of pregnant and breastfeeding women and health professionals. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl 5):S5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hippman C, Balneaves LG. Women’s decision making about antidepressant use during pregnancy: a narrative review. Depress Anxiety. 2018;35(12):1158–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gatti ME, Jacobson KL, Gazmararian JA, Schmotzer B, Kripalani S. Relationships between beliefs about medications and adherence. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66(7):657–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Koren G, Pastuszak A. Prevention of unnecessary pregnancy terminations by counselling women on drug, chemical, and radiation exposure during the first trimester. Teratology. 1990;41(6):657–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Devkota R, Khan GM, Alam K, Sapkota B, Devkota D. Impacts of counseling on knowledge, attitude and practice of medication use during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Behringer T, Rollman BL, Herbeck-Belnap B, Houck PR, Mazumdar S, Schwarz EB. Impact of physician counseling and perception of teratogenic risks: a survey of 96 nonpregnant women with anxiety. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2011;13(2), https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.10m01028.

  32. Gils C, Pottegard A, Ennis ZN, Damkier P. Perception of drug teratogenicity among general practitioners and specialists in obstetrics/gynecology: a regional and national questionnaire-based survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Baron R, Heesterbeek Q, Mannien J, Hutton EK, Brug J, Westerman MJ. Exploring health education with midwives, as perceived by pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2017;46:37–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McLaughlin K, Kable A, Ebert L, Murphy V. Midwives’ perception of their role in providing antenatal asthma management in Australia—a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2016;35:11–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Warriner S, Bryan K, Brown AM. Women’s attitude towards the use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) in pregnancy. Midwifery. 2014;30(1):138–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sinclair M, Lagan BM, Dolk H, McCullough JEM. An assessment of pregnant women’s knowledge and use of the Internet for medication safety information and purchase. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(1):137–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. De Santis M, De Luca C, Quattrocchi T, Visconti D, Cesari E, Mappa I, et al. Use of the Internet by women seeking information about potentially teratogenic agents. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151(2):154–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Peters SL, Lind JN, Humphrey JR, Friedman JM, Honein MA, Tassinari MS, et al. Safe lists for medications in pregnancy: inadequate evidence base and inconsistent guidance from Web-based information, 2011. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(3):324–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Koren G, Bozzo P. Cost effectiveness of teratology counseling—the Motherisk experience. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2014;21(2):e266–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Rasmus Søgaard Nyholm, Charlotte Vermehren & Susanne Kaae

  2. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Jon Trærup Andersen & Charlotte Vermehren

  3. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Jon Trærup Andersen

Authors
  1. Rasmus Søgaard Nyholm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jon Trærup Andersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charlotte Vermehren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Susanne Kaae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Kaae.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received in relation to the study.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nyholm, R.S., Andersen, J.T., Vermehren, C. et al. Perceptions of medicine use among pregnant women: an interview-based study. Int J Clin Pharm 41, 1021–1030 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00840-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00840-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation