Doctor–pharmacist communication in hospitals: strategies, perceptions, limitations and opportunities
Background Effective communication between health professionals contributes to safe and efficient patient care, whereas communication breakdown can lead to adverse patient outcomes and increased healthcare expenditure. Information on how pharmacists and doctors communicate with each other in hospitals is limited. Objective To explore usage and perceptions of communication methods by doctors and pharmacists in hospital settings. Setting Four public hospitals in Australia. Method A mixed method study utilising a pilot questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, and electronic survey was designed. Frequentist statistics and logistic regression were used to analyse survey data. Thematic analysis was conducted to evaluate semi-structured interview data and free-text survey comments. Main outcome measures: Frequency of use of communication methods, perceptions of the convenience, time taken to use, accuracy and effectiveness of each method. Results More than 95% of doctors and pharmacists combined used face-to-face and phone calls to communicate with each other, 70% used a medication management plan, and 62% used progress notes. A preference for oral communication was confirmed with the expressed need for building professional rapport and receiving responses. Perceptions regarding effectiveness of oral communication methods were related to perceptions of their convenience and accuracy. Professional groups described differences in perceived ownership of various modes of communication. Conclusions Preferences for oral communication create potential issues with recall and comprehension. Integrating oral communication features into written communication methods, e.g. creating responses, conversations, building rapport, may change doctors’ and pharmacists’ perceptions of effectiveness. Communication receipt and response functionality in electronic medication and record management systems may improve communication.
KeywordsAccuracy Australia Communication methods Convenience Doctor Effectiveness Hospital Pharmacist Relationship
The Research Team acknowledge and thank Dr Rachel Howard, the Medical Education Officers and Pharmacy Department managers of Metro North Hospital Health Service hospitals, and the participants for their support.
No funding was received.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Åström K, Duggan C, Bates I. Developing a way to improve communication between healthcare professionals in secondary care. Pharm Educ. 2007;7(3):279–285. ISSN: 1560-2214 https://doi.org/10.1080/15602210701619822.
- 2.Nijjer S, Gill J, Nijjer S. Effective collaboration between doctors and pharmacists. Hosp Pharm. 2008;15:179–82.Google Scholar
- 3.Office of Quality and Safety, The Joint Commission. Sentinel event data: root causes by event type 2004–2014. 2015. Available from: https://www.jcrinc.com/the-joint-commission-perspectives/.
- 4.Australian Commission on Quality and Safety in Healthcare. Clinical handover and patient safety: literature review report. Canberra. 2005. ISBN: 0 642 82654 4.Google Scholar
- 5.Liu W, Manias E, Gerdtz M. Exploring power relations embedded in medication communication processes on general medical wards. Qual Res J. 2014;14(2):161–178. ISSN: 1443-9883 https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-06-2013-004.
- 6.Department of Health, Victorian Government. Supporting patient safety. Sentinel event program. Annual report 2011–12 and 2012–13. May, 2014. Available from: https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/about/publications/researchandreports/sentinel-event-program-triennial-report-2013-16.
- 8.Zwarenstein M, Reeves S, Russell A, Kenaszchuk C, Conn LG, Miller KL, et al. Structuring communication relationships for interprofessional teamwork (SCRIPT): a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2007;8:23. ISSN: 1745-6215 https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-23.
- 10.Conn LG, Lingard L, Reeves S, Miller KL, Russell A, Zwarenstein M. Communication channels in general internal medicine: a description of baseline patterns for improved interprofessional collaboration. Qual Health Res. 2009;19(7):943–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309338282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Howard R, Dhieu A. Communication problems between hospital pharmacists and doctors. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009;Supp 1:39–40.Google Scholar
- 14.Axon D, Lim R, Howard R, Lewis P, Sandher S, Thondee J, et al. Exploring communication between junior doctors and hospital pharmacists from the junior doctors perspective: a qualitative study. Int J Pharm Pract. 2014;22:43–4.Google Scholar
- 15.Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare [Internet]. Medication Management Plan. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2017 [cited 2017 Feb 2]. ISSN: 978-1-925224-00-9 Available from: http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/medication-safety/medication-reconciliation/nmmp/.
- 16.The Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia. Standards of Practice for Clinical Pharmacy Services. JPPR. 2013;43(2 Supp). Available from: https://www.shpa.org.au/resources/standards-of-practice-for-clinical-pharmacy-services.
- 17.Hatten-Masterson S, Griffiths M. SHAREing maternity care: clinical handover between visiting medical officers and midwives—public report on pilot study. Brisbane: Mater Health Services Ltd. 2009. Available from: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/SHAREing-Maternity-Care-Clinical-Handover-between-Visiting-Medical-Officers-and-Midwives.-Public-Report-of-Pilot-Study.pdf.
- 18.Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. The OSSIE guide to clinical handover improvement. ACQSHC, Sydney, 2010. Available from https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ossie.pdf.
- 19.Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis: APA handbook of research methods in psychology. 2012;2:57–71. ISBN-139781433810039.Google Scholar
- 24.Makowsky MJ, Schindel TJ, Rosenthal M, Campbell K, Tsuyuki RT, Madill HM. Collaboration between pharmacists, physicians and nurse practitioners: a qualitative investigation of working relationships in the inpatient medical setting. J Interprof Care. 2009;23(2):169–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820802602552.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar