Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 1101–1109 | Cite as

Perceptions and behaviors of patients and pharmacists towards generic drug substitution in Lebanon

  • Shadi SalehEmail author
  • Clara Abou Samra
  • Stewart Jleilaty
  • Joanne Constantin
  • Nour El Arnaout
  • Hani Dimassi
  • Dania Al-Bittar
Research Article
  • 239 Downloads

Abstract

Background Patients, physicians and pharmacists are key stakeholders in the implementation of generic substitution policies. Objectives To explore Lebanese patients’ perceptions and experience, and pharmacists’ dispensing patterns towards the newly enacted unified health prescription policy promoting generic substitution. Setting Pharmacies in Beirut, the capital of Lebanon. Methods A cross-sectional design employing self-administered questionnaires to survey a total of 128 patients and 25 pharmacists. Chi square test and multiple logistic regression were performed. Main outcome Perceptions and behaviors of patients and pharmacists towards the unified health prescription and generic substitution. Results Fourty-eight percent of the patients knew the definition of generic drugs, among which 59.0% perceived that generic drugs have the same effectiveness as their branded alternatives and 59.0% perceiving that generic drugs could reduce Lebanon’s medical bill as well. Sixty-one percent of the patients were aware of the unified health prescription. Only 13.6% of the pharmacists suggested to patients to replace prescribed brand drug by a generic when their prescriptions were not marked with non-substitution. Conclusions Progress has been made with regards to enhancing generic substitution in the Lebanese healthcare field. However, it remains important to educate patients about generic medicines and plan context-specific schemes that promote prescribing and dispensing of generic drugs among physicians and pharmacists.

Keywords

Access to medicine Generic drugs Health policy Lebanon Outpatients Pharmacy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all the patients and pharmacists who participated in the survey. We also thank Ms. Angie Farah for her contribution.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

The American University of Beirut’s Institutional Review Board approved the protocol from March 8, 2016 to March 7, 2017 inclusive (FHS.SS.17).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. How to develop and implement a national drug policy, Geneva. 2002. http://www.who.int/management/background_4b.pdf. Accessed Aug 2017.
  2. 2.
    Andersson K, Bergström G, Petzold MG, Carlsten A. Impact of a generic substitution reform on patients’ and society’s expenditure for pharmaceuticals. Health Policy. 2007;81(2):376–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gerdtham U-G, Lundin D. Why did drug spending increase during the 1990s? Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(1):29–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heikkilä R, Mäntyselkä P, Hartikainen-Herranen K, Ahonen R. Customers’ and physicians’ opinions of and experiences with generic substitution during the first year in Finland. Health Policy. 2007;82(3):366–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kobayashi E, Karigome H, Sakurada T, Satoh N, Ueda S. Patients’ attitudes towards generic drug substitution in Japan. Health Policy. 2011;99(1):60–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andersson K, Sonesson C, Petzold M, Carlsten A, Lönnroth K. What are the obstacles to generic substitution? An assessment of the behaviour of prescribers, patients and pharmacies during the first year of generic substitution in Sweden. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14(5):341–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fabiano V, Mameli C, Cattaneo D, Delle Fave A, Preziosa A, Mele G, et al. Perceptions and patterns of use of generic drugs among Italian family pediatricians: first round results of a web survey. Health Policy. 2012;104(3):247–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fischer MA, Avorn J. Economic consequences of underuse of generic drugs: evidence from Medicaid and implications for prescription drug benefit plans. Health Serv Res. 2003;38(4):1051–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fischer MA, Avorn J. Potential savings from increased use of generic drugs in the elderly: what the experience of Medicaid and other insurance programs means for a Medicare drug benefit. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004;13(4):207–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garattini L, Tediosi F. A comparative analysis of generics markets in five European countries. Health Policy. 2000;51(3):149–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McManus P, Birkett DJ, Dudley J, Stevens A. Impact of the minimum pricing policy and introduction of brand (generic) substitution into the pharmaceutical benefits scheme in Australia. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001;10(4):295–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hellerstein JK. The importance of the physician in the generic versus trade-name prescription decision. Rand J Econ. 1998;29(1):108–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karim SA, Pillai G, Ziqubu-Page T, Cassimjee M, Morar M. Potential savings from generic prescribing and generic substitution in South Africa. Health policy Plan. 1996;11(2):198–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    King DR, Kanavos P. Encouraging the use of generic medicines: implications for transition economies. Croatian Med J. 2002;43(4):462–9.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lofgren H. Generic drugs: international trends and policy developments in Australia. Aust Health Rev. 2004;27(1):39–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kjoenniksen I, Lindbaek M, Granas AG. Patients’ attitudes towards and experiences of generic drug substitution in Norway. Pharm World Sci. 2006;28(5):284–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    OECD. Health at a Glance 2013: OECD indicators. 2013. https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Health-at-a-Glance-2013.pdf. Accessed Aug 2017.
  18. 18.
    MOPH. Launching of the unified medical prescription (2011). http://www.moph.gov.lb/Media/Pages/Launchoftheunifiedmedicprescription.aspx. Accessed 13 Nov 2015.
  19. 19.
    Mahdi H. Unified prescription form: NSSF in the service of drug monopolies. Al Akhbar. 2015 Tuesday, 10 Feb 2015.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Olsson E, Kälvemark Sporrong S. Pharmacists’ experiences and attitudes regarding generic drugs and generic substitution: two sides of the coin. Int J Pharm Pract. 2012;20(6):377–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yousefi N, Mehralian G, Peiravian F, NourMohammadi S. Consumers’ perception of generic substitution in Iran. Int J Clin Pharm. 2015;37(3):497–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Figueiras MJ, Marcelino D, Cortes MA. People’s views on the level of agreement of generic medicines for different illnesses. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30(5):590–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Banahan BF, Kolassa E. A physician survey on generic drugs and substitution of critical dose medications. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(18):2080–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ganther JM, Kreling DH. Consumer perceptions of risk and required cost savings for generic prescription drugs. J Am Pharm Assoc (1996). 2000;40(3):378–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hassali MA, Shafie AA, Jamshed S, Ibrahim MI, Awaisu A. Consumers’ views on generic medicines: a review of the literature. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009;17(2):79–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shrank WH, Cadarette SM, Cox E, Fischer MA, Mehta J, Brookhart AM, et al. Is there a relationship between patient beliefs or communication about generic drugs and medication utilization? Med Care. 2009;47(3):319.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Suh DC. Trends of generic substitution in community pharmacies. Pharm World Sci. 1999;21(6):260–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hamadeh GN, Dickerson LM, Saab BR, Major SC. Common prescriptions in ambulatory care in Lebanon. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35(5):636–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sharif S, Al-Shaqra M, Hajjar H, Shamout A, Wess L. Patterns of drug prescribing in a hospital in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Libyan J Med. 2008;3(1):10–2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Irshaid Y, Al Homrany M, Hamdi A, Adjepon Yamoah K, Mahfouz A. Compliance with good practice in prescription writing at outpatient clinics in Saudi Arabia. 2005. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/117022.
  31. 31.
    Chong CP, March G, Clark A, Gilbert A, Hassali MA, Bahari MB. A nationwide study on generic medicines substitution practices of Australian community pharmacists and patient acceptance. Health Policy. 2011;99(2):139–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Grover P, Stewart J, Hogg M, Short L, Seo HG, Rew A. Evaluating pharmacists’ views, knowledge, and perception regarding generic medicines in New Zealand. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2011;7(3):294–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Colgan S, Faasse K, Martin LR, Stephens MH, Grey A, Petrie KJ. Perceptions of generic medication in the general population, doctors and pharmacists: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e008915.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shadi Saleh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Clara Abou Samra
    • 1
  • Stewart Jleilaty
    • 1
  • Joanne Constantin
    • 1
  • Nour El Arnaout
    • 1
  • Hani Dimassi
    • 2
  • Dania Al-Bittar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Health SciencesAmerican University of BeirutBeirutLebanon
  2. 2.School of PharmacyLebanese American UniversityBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations