Cost analysis for the implementation of a medication review with follow-up service in Spain
- 311 Downloads
Background Medication review with follow-up (MRF) is a professional pharmacy service proven to be cost-effective. Its broader implementation is limited, mainly due to the lack of evidence-based implementation programs that include economic and financial analysis. Objective To analyse the costs and estimate the price of providing and implementing MRF. Setting Community pharmacy in Spain. Method Elderly patients using poly-pharmacy received a community pharmacist-led MRF for 6 months. The cost analysis was based on the time-driven activity based costing model and included the provider costs, initial investment costs and maintenance expenses. The service price was estimated using the labour costs, costs associated with service provision, potential number of patients receiving the service and mark-up. Main outcome measures Costs and potential price of MRF. Results A mean time of 404.4 (SD 232.2) was spent on service provision and was extrapolated to annual costs. Service provider cost per patient ranged from €196 (SD 90.5) to €310 (SD 164.4). The mean initial investment per pharmacy was €4594 and the mean annual maintenance costs €3,068. Largest items contributing to cost were initial staff training, continuing education and renting of the patient counselling area. The potential service price ranged from €237 to €628 per patient a year. Conclusion Time spent by the service provider accounted for 75–95% of the final cost, followed by initial investment costs and maintenance costs. Remuneration for professional pharmacy services provision must cover service costs and appropriate profit, allowing for their long-term sustainability.
KeywordsCommunity pharmacy Cost analysis Implementation Medication review Professional pharmacy services Spain Sustainability
This study was funded by Cinfa Laboratories.
Conflicts of interest
All the authors have declared they have no conflict of interest.
Availability of data and materials
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author (VGC). The data are not publicly available due to relevant data protection laws.
- 1.World Health Organization. The world health report: primary health care now more than ever. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008. [Cited 21 Dec 2015]. (ISBN: 9789241563734). http://www.who.int/whr/2008/whr08_en.pdf.
- 10.Jodar-Sanchez F, Malet-Larrea A, Martin JJ, Garcia-Mochon L, Lopez Del Amo MP, Martinez-Martinez F, et al. Cost-utility analysis of a medication review with follow-up service for older adults with polypharmacy in community pharmacies in Spain: the conSIGUE program. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(6):599–610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Benrimoj SI, Feletto E, Gastelurrutia MA, Martinez-Martinez F, Faus MJ. A holistic and integrated approach to implementing cognitive pharmaceutical services. Ars Pharm. 2010;51:69–87.Google Scholar
- 12.Accounting Management Commission. Cost Strategic Management. Document 23. 1st ed. Madrid: Spanish Association of Accounting and Business Management; 2001. p. 120.Google Scholar
- 13.Kaplan R, Robert S. Research opportunities in management accounting. J Manag Acc Res. 1993;5:1–14.Google Scholar
- 20.Martinez-Martinez F, García-Cardenas V, Sanz-Benito L, Varas R, Gastelurrutia M, Sabater-Hernandez D, et al. [conSIGUE Program. Evaluation of the clinical, economic and humanistic impact of medication review with follow-up in aged patients using polypharmacy]. Vitae. 2013;20(Suppl1):S15–S8.Google Scholar
- 21.Martinez-Martinez F, Farragher T, Faus M, Garcia-Cardenas V, Gastelurrutia M, Jodar F. Clinical, economic and humanistic outcomes of medication review with follow-up in aged polypharmacy patients in the Spanish community pharmacy. Madrid: General Council of Spanish Pharmacists; 2014. [Cited 19 Dec 2015]. (ISBN: 9788487276835). http://www.pharmaceutical-care.org/archivos/992/V2-Resultados-Definitivos-Programa-Consigue-Impacto-2011-2014.pdf.
- 22.Pharmaceutical Care Forum. Expert Panel. Consensus Document. Madrid: General Council of Spanish Pharmacists; 2010. [Cited 19 Feb 2015]. (ISBN: 9788469112434). http://www.portalfarma.com/inicio/atencionfarmaceutica/forodeattfarma/Documents/DocumentodeConsensodeForo2008.pdf.
- 23.Everaert P, Bruggerman W. Time-driven activity-based costing: exploring the underlying model. Cost Manag. 2007;21(2):16–20.Google Scholar
- 24.Kaplan RS, Anderson SR. Time-driven activity based-costing. A simpler and more powerful path to higher profits. 5th ed. Boston: Harvard Business Press; 2007. p. 265. (ISBN: 1422101711).Google Scholar
- 25.Noain M, Gastelurrutia M, Martínez-Martínez F, Benrimoj S. Costs’ identification of the sustainable provision of the medication management service. Pharm Care Esp. 2014;16(5):180–92.Google Scholar
- 26.Spanish Goverment. [Resolution of the 7th January 2011 by the General Labour Office, registering and publishing the XXIII colective agreement for community pharmacies]; 2011. [Cited 12 Sept 2015]. http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2011/01/24/pdfs/BOE-S-2011-20.pdf.
- 27.Asesoria Especializada en Farmacias. [Annual community pharmacy report]. Aspime; 2011. [Cited 20 Sept 2015]. http://www.aspime.es/asesoramiento/InformeAnualOficinasdeFarmacia2011ASPIMEVersionweb.pdf.
- 28.Spanish Goverment. [Law 26/2009, 23rd December, of General National State Budget for 2010. BOE No. 309, 24th December 2009]; 2009. [Cited 2 Nov 2015]. http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2009/12/24/pdfs/BOE-A-2009-20765.pdf.
- 29.Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality; 2012. [Cited 16 Dec 2015]. http://www.seg-social.es/Internet_6/Trabajadores/Afiliacion/Afiliaciondetrabaja7332/index.htm.
- 30.National Statistics Institute. [Working time survey]; 2000. [Cited 2 Nov 2015]. http://www.ine.es/dynt3/inebase/index.htm?type=pcaxis&path=/t22/p186/a2000&file=pcaxis&L=0.
- 31.Financial Accounting Standards Board. [Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6. Elements of Financial Statements]; 1985. [Cited 1 July 2015]. http://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/Document_C/DocumentPage?cid=1218220132802&acceptedDisclaimer=true.
- 33.Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards. 2008. [Cited 22 Jan 2015]. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=URISERV:l26040.
- 34.Spanish Goverment. [Law 1515/2007, 16th November, aproving the general accounting plan for small and medium business and specific accounting criteria for microbusiness. BOE No. 279. 21st November 2007]; 2007. [Cited 8 Sept 2015]. http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2007/11/21/pdfs/A47560-47566.pdf.
- 40.Garcia-Cardenas V, Benrimoj SI, Ocampo CC, Goyenechea E, Martinez-Martinez F, Gastelurrutia MA. Evaluation of the implementation process and outcomes of a professional pharmacy service in a community pharmacy setting. A case report. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.05.048.Google Scholar
- 41.Noain M, Gastelurrutia M, Martínez-Martínez F, Benrimoj S. Potential remuneration models for medication review with follow-up service in community pharmacy. Pharm Care Esp. 2015;17(4):423–41.Google Scholar