Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 1357–1361 | Cite as

Pharmacist-only trimethoprim: pharmacist satisfaction on their training and the impact on their practice

  • Rhiannon BraundEmail author
  • Emily Henderson
  • Erica McNab
  • Rachel Sarten
  • Emily Wallace
  • Natalie Gauld
Short Research Report

Abstract

Background In 2012, in a first for the developed world, New Zealand reclassified trimethoprim to allow specially trained pharmacists to supply the medicine without a prescription to women with cystitis fitting specific criteria. Objective This study explored pharmacists’ views of the training and screening tool, impact on practice, and the pharmacists’ perceptions of views of patients and doctors. Methods Structured interviews were conducted with 28 New Zealand pharmacists trained to supply trimethoprim. These pharmacists were selected to represent geographical spread as well as urban, suburban and rural. The key areas for investigation were: satisfaction about training, appropriateness of training, opinions on the screening tool, impact on clinical practice and perception of others. Audio recorded interviews were thematically analyzed. Results Of 40 pharmacies invited, 28 pharmacists agreed to participate. Most pharmacists were positive about being able to supply trimethoprim, the training and increased clinical focus of their practice. The content of the training was considered appropriate, as was the screening tool, which was well utilised during consultations. Minor suggestions on the training and consultation materials were provided. Some pharmacists reported that referral to the doctor without supply in a minority of trimethoprim consultations, frustrated some women. Frequency of supplies varied considerably by pharmacists from none supplied to weekly supplies. Some pharmacists questioned the exclusion to supply for women who had taken antibiotics in the last six months. Many women had reportedly appreciated the easier access in the pharmacy compared with doctor access, especially at weekends, but sometimes misunderstood the role of the pharmacist in the supply. While pharmacists reported that some doctors had been negative about pharmacist-supply, others were informing women about the service from the pharmacist. Conclusion Pharmacist supply of trimethoprim using mandated training and a screening tool or algorithm for supply is workable and well-accepted by pharmacists. Minor changes have been recommended. Further research is needed to understand perspectives of other stakeholders (women, doctors and practice nurses) and outcomes for patients.

Keywords

Anti-bacterial agents Community pharmacy services Cystitis New Zealand Nonprescription drugs Pharmacist opinion Reclassification 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the participation of pharmacists in the interviews.

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

NG prepared the application for reclassification of trimethoprim in NZ, worked on the screening tool, and contributed to the trimethoprim training. NG consults in reclassification of medicines, and is a member of the Board of the Pharmaceutical Society of New Zealand.

References

  1. 1.
    Gauld NJ, Kelly FS, Kurosawa N, Bryant LJM, Emmerton LM, et al. Widening consumer access to medicines through switching medicines to non-prescription: a six country comparison. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(9):e107726.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mann S. Simvastatin for self-medication in the UK. SelfCare J. 2010;1(1):29–43.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gauld N, Kelly F, Shaw J. Is non-prescription oseltamivir availability under strict criteria workable? A qualitative study in New Zealand. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011;66(1):201–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gauld N. Improving access to urinary tract infection treatment: the reclassification of trimethoprim. SelfCare J. 2012;3(6):115–20.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Antibiotics: choices for common infections. Best Practice Journal [serial on the Internet]. 2013. http://www.bpac.org.nz/Supplement/2013/July/docs/Antibioitcs_guide_2013.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2015.
  6. 6.
    Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000;320(7227):114–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braund R, Chesney KM, Keast EP, Ng LJ, Qi S, Samaranayaka S, et al. Are all pharmacy staff interested in potential future roles? Int. J. Pharm. Pract. 2012;20:417–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paudyal V, Hansford D, Cunningham S, Stewart D. Community pharmacists’ adoption of medicines reclassified from prescription-only status: a systematic review of factors associated with decision making. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2012;21(4):396–406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gauld NJ, Zeng ISL, Ikram RB, Thomas MG, Buetow SA. Treatment of uncomplicated cystitis: analysis of prescribing in New Zealand. N. Z. Med. J. 2016;129(1437):55–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bryant LJM, Coster G, Gamble GD, McCormick RN. General practitioners’ and pharmacists’ perceptions of the role of community pharmacists in delivering clinical services. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2009;5:347–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rhiannon Braund
    • 1
    Email author
  • Emily Henderson
    • 1
  • Erica McNab
    • 1
  • Rachel Sarten
    • 1
  • Emily Wallace
    • 1
  • Natalie Gauld
    • 2
  1. 1.Clinical Pharmacy Practice, School of PharmacyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Honorary Research Fellow, Department of General Practice and Primary Health CareUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations