International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 1407–1415 | Cite as

A quantitative comparison of ward-based clinical pharmacy activities in 7 acute UK hospitals

  • Raliat OnatadeEmail author
  • Gavin Miller
  • Inderjit Sanghera
Research Article


Background Several clinical pharmacy activities are common to UK hospitals. It is not clear whether these are provided at similar levels, and whether they take similar amounts of time to carry out. Objective To quantify and compare clinical pharmacist ward activities between different UK hospitals. Setting Seven acute hospitals in the Greater London area (UK). Methods A list of common ward activities was developed. On five consecutive days, pharmacists visiting hospital wards documented total time spent and how many of each activity they undertook. Results were analysed by hospital. The range and number of activities per 100 occupied bed days, and per 24 beds were compared. Main outcome measure Time spent on wards and numbers of each activity undertaken. Results Pharmacists logged a total of 2291 h carrying out 40,000 activities. 4250 changes to prescriptions were made or recommended. 5901 individual medication orders were annotated for clarity or safety. For every 24 beds visited, mean time spent was 230 min—seeing 6.2 new patients, carrying out 3.9 calculations and 1.3 patient consultations, checking and authorising 1.8 discharge prescriptions, and providing staff with information twice. Other activities varied significantly, not all could be explained by differences in hospital specialties or Information Technology systems. Conclusion This is the first detailed comparison of clinical pharmacy ward activities between different hospitals. There are some typical levels of activities carried out. Wide variations in other activities could not always be explained. Despite a large number of contacts, pharmacists reported very few consultation sessions with patients.


Benchmarking Clinical pharmacy Hospital Pharmacists Secondary care United Kingdom 



The authors wish to acknowledge pharmacy staff at participating organisations for their support in data collection.


This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Calvert RT. Clinical pharmacy—a hospital perspective. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;47:231–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Medicines Optimisation: helping patients to make the most of medicines. London; 2013.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dornan T, Ashcroft D, Heathfield H, Lewis P, Miles J, Taylor D, et al. An in depth investigation into causes of prescribing errors by foundation trainees in relation to their medical education. EQUIP study. Gen Med Counc Lond. 2009;44:1–215.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stephens M. Hospital pharmacy. 2nd ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2011. ISBN 978-0-85369-900-2.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    American College of Clinical Pharmacy. The definition of clinical pharmacy. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28:816–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaboli PJ, Hoth AB, McClimon BJ, Schnipper JL. Clinical pharmacists and inpatient medical care. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:955–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gallagher J, McCarthy S, Byrne S. Economic evaluations of clinical pharmacist interventions on hospital inpatients: a systematic review of recent literature. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36:1101–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fitzpatrick RW, Boardman HF. A survey of the provision of clinical pharmacy services in relation to existing published standards. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27:191–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cotter S, Barber N, McKee M. Survey of clinical pharmacy services in United Kingdom National Health Service hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994;51:2676–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Professional Standards for Hospital Pharmacy Services. London; 2014.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    NICE. Medicines optimisation: the safe and effective use of medicines to enable the best possible outcomes. London; 2015. ISBN: 978-1-4731-1057-1.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    NHS Benchmarking Network. Benchmarking Pharmacy and Medicines Optimisation. 2014. Accessed 10 July 2016.
  13. 13.
    Batty R, Beech E. Prescription monitoring interventions—is recording justified. Hosp Pharm. 1994;1:100.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alderman CP, Farmer C. A brief analysis of clinical pharmacy interventions undertaken in an Australian teaching hospital. J Qual Clin Pract. 2001;21:99–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ball J. Guidance on safe nurse staffing levels in the UK. London; 2010. ISBN: 978-1-906633-60-8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Darzi A. High quality care for all: NHS next stage review final report. Department of Health. London; 2008.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Franklin BD, Rosa MB, Miller G, Jacklin A. The evaluation of a novel model of providing ward pharmacy services. Int J Clin Pharm. 2012;34:518–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Donyai P, O’Grady K, Jacklin A, Barber N, Franklin BD. The effects of electronic prescribing on the quality of prescribing. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;65:230–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dodds LJ. Pharmacist contributions to ensuring safe and accurate transfer of written medicines-related discharge information: lessons from a collaborative audit and service evaluation involving 45 hospitals in England. Eur J Hosp Pharm Sci Pract. 2014;21:150–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Onatade R, Wong A. Adaptable “scope of practice” template for hospital pharmacist prescribers. Pharm J. 2012;288:720.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bourne RS, Baqir W, Onatade R. Pharmacist independent prescribing in secondary care: opportunities and challenges. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38:1–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baqir W, Crehan O, Murray R, Campbell D, Copeland R. Pharmacist prescribing within a UK NHS hospital trust: nature and extent of prescribing, and prevalence of errors. Eur J Hosp Pharm Sci Pract. 2014;22:79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carter, L. Operational productivity and performance in English NHS acute hospitals: unwarranted variations. London; 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Pharmaceutical SciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Pharmaceutical Sciences Clinical Academic GroupKing’s Health PartnersLondonUK
  3. 3.Pharmacy DepartmentKing’s College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
  4. 4.Pharmacy DepartmentLewisham and Greenwich NHS TrustLondonUK
  5. 5.Pharmacy DepartmentLondon North West Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK

Personalised recommendations