Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 724–730 | Cite as

Future methods in pharmacy practice research

  • A. B. Almarsdottir
  • Z. U. D. BabarEmail author
Commentary

Abstract

This article describes the current and future practice of pharmacy scenario underpinning and guiding this research and then suggests future directions and strategies for such research. First, it sets the scene by discussing the key drivers which could influence the change in pharmacy practice research. These are demographics, technology and professional standards. Second, deriving from this, it seeks to predict and forecast the future shifts in use of methodologies. Third, new research areas and availability of data impacting on future methods are discussed. These include the impact of aging information technology users on healthcare, understanding and responding to cultural and social disparities, implementing multidisciplinary initiatives to improve health care, medicines optimization and predictive risk analysis, and pharmacy as business and health care institution. Finally, implications of the trends for pharmacy practice research methods are discussed.

Keywords

Future Pharmacy practice Research methods 

Notes

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors have any competing interests in the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Abramowitz PW. The evolution and metamorphosis of the pharmacy practice model. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2009;66:1437–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goundrey-Smith S. Examining the role of new technology in pharmacy: now and in the future. Pharma J. 2014 Feb 11 [cited 2015 April]. Supplements, Focus on Community Pharmacy, online. URI: 11134174. http://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/…/ex…/11134174.article.
  3. 3.
    Thomas M, Plimley J. The future of community pharmacy in England. A. T. Kearney, Inc.; 2012. https://www.atkearney.com/documents/10192/649132/The+Future+of+Community+Pharmacy.pdf/1838dede-b95a-4989-8600-6b435bd00171. Accessed 13 May 2015.
  4. 4.
    Knapp DA. Professionally determined need for pharmacy services in 2020. Am J Pharm Educ. 2002;66(4):421–9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shader ME. The evolving scope of pharmacy practice: perspectives from future pharmacists Athena M. Ling, Nicholas J. Panno, Megan E. Shader, Rachel M. Sobinsky, Heather N. Whitehead, and Kenneth M. Hale.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Canadian Pharmacists Association (2008) Blueprint for pharmacy: designing the future together. Canadian Pharmacists Association, Ottawa. https://www.hpharmacists.ca/pharmacy-in-canada/blueprint-for-pharmacy/. Accessed 13 May 2016.
  7. 7.
    Babar ZUD, Ballantyne P, Gray A, Kiani A, Scahill S, Vogler S. The future of medicines use and access research: using the journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice as a platform for change. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2014;7:8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Traulsen JM, Almarsdóttir AB. Pharmaceutical policy and the pharmacy profession. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27(5):359–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McMillan SS, Wheeler AJ, Sav A, King MA, Whitty JA, Kendall E, et al. Community pharmacy in Australia: a health hub destination of the future. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2013;9:863–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coulter A, Magee H. The European patient of the future. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barr PJ, Mcelnay JC, Hughes CM. Connected health care: the future of health care and the role of the pharmacist. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(1):56–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Webster L, Spiro RF. Health information technology: a new world for pharmacy. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2010;50(2):e20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mak VSL, Clark A, Poulsen JH, Udengaard KU, Gilbert AL. Pharmacists’ awareness of Australia’s health care reforms and their beliefs and attitudes about their current and future roles. Int J Pharm Pract. 2012;20(1):33–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mancinelli L, Cronin M, Sadée W. Pharmacogenomics: the promise of personalized medicine. AAPS Pharm Sci. 2000;2(1):29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tomaszewski DM, Schweiss SK, Hager KD. Pharmacist- provided ambulatory patient care: progressing pharmacy practice and preparing the next generation of pharmacists. J Exp Clin Med. 2012;4(4):255–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Afolabi MO, Erhun WO. Patients\’response to waiting time in an out-patient pharmacy in Nigeria. Trop J Pharm Res. 2005;2(2):207–14.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith J, Picton C, Dayan M. Now or never: shaping pharmacy for the future. The report of the commission on future models of care delivered through pharmacy. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain; 2013.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davis K, Schoenbaum SC, Audet A. A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care. J Gen Int Med. 2005;20(10):953–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V. Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Health Inform Sci Syst. 2014;2:3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barr PA. The boomer challenge. Trustee. 2014; pp.13–6. http://www.trusteemag.com/magazine/2014/February2014.dhtml. Accessed 13 May 2016.
  21. 21.
    Nørreslet M, Bissell P, Traulsen JM. From consumerism to active dependence: patterns of medicines use and treatment decisions among patients with atopic dermatitis. Health. 2009;14(1):91–106.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Almarsdottir AB, Kaae S, Traulsen JM. Opportunities and challenges in social pharmacy and pharmacy practice research. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014;10(1):252–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scahill SL. Community pharmacy doesn’t appear as part of the collaboration discourse within New Zealand primary care. J Prim Healthc. 2011;3(3):244–7.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hacker JS. Market-driven health care: who wins, who loses in the transformation of America’s largest service industry. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997;22(6):1443–8.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Traulsen JM, Noerreslet M. The new consumer of medicine—the pharmacy technicians’ perspective. Pharm World Sci. 2004;26(4):203–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zezulka BJ, Voss HH, Fincati AM, inventors; Alberta Research Council, assignee. Robotic drug dispensing system. United States patent US 5,341,854; 1994 Aug 30.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pearson GJ. Evolution in the practice of pharmacy—not a revolution! Can Med Assoc J. 2007;176(9):1295–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bates DW. Using information technology to reduce rates of medication errors in hospitals. Br Med J. 2000;320(7237):788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Scahill SL. Community pharmacy does not appear as part of the collaboration discourse within New Zealand primary care. J Prim Health Care. 2011;3(3):244–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Syed HR, Dalgard OS, Hussain A, Dalen I, Claussen B, Ahlberg NL. Inequalities in health: a comparative study between ethnic Norwegians and Pakistanis in Oslo, Norway. Int J Equity Health. 2006;5(1):7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health SciencesUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Institute of Public HealthUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
  3. 3.Lahore Pharmacy College (A project of Lahore Medical and Dental College)LahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations