International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 208–212 | Cite as

Post discharge medicines use review service for older patients: recruitment issues in a feasibility study

  • Helen Frances RamsbottomEmail author
  • Ray Fitzpatrick
  • Paul Rutter
Short Research Report


Background The community pharmacy medicines use review (MUR) service in England has been identified as a way of providing support with medication to recently discharged patients; however initial uptake of post-discharge MUR has been low. Objective To identify barriers to recruitment into a randomised controlled feasibility study of a hospital referral system to older patients’ regular community pharmacists. Method Ward pharmacists at Southport District General Hospital identified patients aged over 65 to be approached by a researcher to assess eligibility and discuss involvement in the trial. Participants were randomised to referral for a post discharge MUR with their regular community pharmacist, or to standard discharge care. Reasons for patients not participating were collected. Results Over a 9-month period 337 potential participants were identified by ward pharmacists. Of these, 132 were eligible and 60 were recruited. Barriers to recruitment included competing priorities among ward pharmacists, and national restrictions placed on MURs e.g. housebound patients and those requiring carer support with medication. Lack of expected benefit resulted in a high proportion of patient refusals. Conclusion The current provisions for post discharge MURs exclude many older people from participation, including those possibly in greatest need. Unfamiliarity with the role of the pharmacist in transitional care may have affected patients’ perceived ‘cost-benefit’ of taking part in this study.


Hospital discharge Medication review Older people Pharmacist Recruitment Study challenges 




Conflicts of interest



  1. 1.
    Mansur N, Weiss A, Beloosesky Y. Relationship of in-hospital medication modifications of elderly patients to postdischarge medications, adherence, and mortality. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42(6):783–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steering Group on Improving the Use of Medicines (for better outcomes and reduced waste). Improving the use of medicines for better outcomes and reduced waste: An action plan. Department of Health. 2012. Accessed 14 Dec 2015.
  3. 3.
    Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Keeping patients safe when they transfer between care providers—getting the medicines right. Final Report. RPS. 2012. Accessed 14 Dec 2015.
  4. 4.
    Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee/NHS Employers. Medicines use review and prescription intervention service specification. PSNC and NHS Employers. 2013. Accessed 14 Dec 2015.
  5. 5.
    Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Keeping patients safe when they transfer between care providers—getting the medicines right. Individual reports from the Early Adopter Sites. RPS. 2012. Accessed 14 Dec 2015.
  6. 6.
    Bhatti N, Blenkinsopp A, Devlin L, Farooq H, Kazi I, Mulla I, et al. Community pharmacists’ experiences of managing patients’ medicines after discharge from hospital: a preliminary study of discharge medicines use reviews. Int J Pharm Pract. 2013;21(Supp2):86–7.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McMurdo MET, Roberts H, Parker S, Wyatt N, May H, Goodman C, et al. Improving recruitment of older people to research through good practice. Age Ageing. 2011;40(6):659–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fialová D, Topinková E, Gambassi G, Finne-Soveri H, Jonsson PV, Carpenter I, et al. Potentially inappropriate medication use among elderly home care patients in Europe. JAMA. 2005;293(11):1348–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baqir W, Desai N, Harker N, Vyas A, Copeland R, Burdon M, et al. Can targeted medicines use reviews support safe transfer of care from hospital to community? Int J Pharm Pract. 2012;20(Supp2):82–3.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petty DR, Zermansky AG, Raynor DK, Vail A, Lowe CJ, Freemantle N, et al. “No thank you”: why elderly patients declined to participate in a research study. Pharm World Sci. 2001;23:22–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij ter bevordering der Pharmacie 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Frances Ramsbottom
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ray Fitzpatrick
    • 3
  • Paul Rutter
    • 4
  1. 1.Southport and Ormskirk Hospitals NHS TrustSouthportUK
  2. 2.University of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK
  3. 3.Keele UniversityKeeleUK
  4. 4.University of Central LancashirePrestonUK

Personalised recommendations