Ensuring rigour and trustworthiness of qualitative research in clinical pharmacy
- 3.4k Downloads
The use of qualitative research methodology is well established for data generation within healthcare research generally and clinical pharmacy research specifically. In the past, qualitative research methodology has been criticized for lacking rigour, transparency, justification of data collection and analysis methods being used, and hence the integrity of findings. Demonstrating rigour in qualitative studies is essential so that the research findings have the “integrity” to make an impact on practice, policy or both. Unlike other healthcare disciplines, the issue of “quality” of qualitative research has not been discussed much in the clinical pharmacy discipline. The aim of this paper is to highlight the importance of rigour in qualitative research, present different philosophical standpoints on the issue of quality in qualitative research and to discuss briefly strategies to ensure rigour in qualitative research. Finally, a mini review of recent research is presented to illustrate the strategies reported by clinical pharmacy researchers to ensure rigour in their qualitative research studies.
KeywordsClinical pharmacy Qualitative research Rigour Trustworthiness
No funding from any governmental or non-governmental agency was obtained for this paper.
Conflicts of interest
- 1.Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005.Google Scholar
- 4.Rolfe G. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. J Appl Nurs. 2006;53:304–10.Google Scholar
- 7.Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1985.Google Scholar
- 9.Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2002;1:13–22.Google Scholar
- 14.Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2006.Google Scholar
- 15.Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 1995.Google Scholar
- 16.Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Edu Inform. 2004;22:63–75.Google Scholar
- 18.Nguyen TST. Peer debriefing. The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. 2008. http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/sage-encyc-qualitative-research-methods/n312.xml. Accessed 5 June 2014.
- 19.Ogunbayo OJ, Schafheutle EI, Cutts C, Noyce PR. A qualitative study exploring community pharmacists’ awareness of, and contribution to, self-care support in the management of long-term conditions in the United Kingdom. Res Soc Adm Pharm 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014 [Published online Feb, 2015].
- 20.Shiyanbola OO, Mort JR. Exploring consumer understanding and preferences for pharmacy quality information. Pharm Pract. 2014;12:1–11.Google Scholar
- 25.Marquis J, Schneider MP, Spencer B, Bugnon O, Pasquier SD. Exploring the implementation of a medication adherence programme by community pharmacists: a qualitative study Int J. Clin Pharm. 2014;36:1014–22.Google Scholar
- 26.Swain L, Griffits C, Lisa Pont L, Barclay L. Attitudes of pharmacists to provision of home medicines review for indigenous Australians. Int. J Clin Pharm. 2014;36:1260–7.Google Scholar
- 27.Brazinha I, Fernandez-Llimos F. Barriers to the implementation of advanced clinical pharmacy services at Portuguese hospitals Int J. Clin Pharm. 2014;36:1031–8.Google Scholar