Training on the use of a bespoke continuing professional development framework improves the quality of CPD records
Background Using continuing professional development (CPD) as part of the revalidation of pharmacy professionals has been proposed in the UK but not implemented. We developed a CPD outcomes framework (‘the framework’) for scoring CPD records, where the score range was −100 to +150 based on demonstrable relevance and impact of the CPD on practice. Objective This exploratory study aimed to test the outcome of training people to use the framework, through distance-learning material (active intervention), by comparing CPD scores before and after training. Setting Pharmacy professionals were recruited in the UK in Reading, Banbury, Southampton, Kingston-upon-Thames and Guildford in 2009. Method We conducted a randomised, double-blinded, parallel-group, before and after study. The control group simply received information on new CPD requirements through the post; the active intervention group also received the framework and associated training. Altogether 48 participants (25 control, 23 active) completed the study. All participants submitted CPD records to the research team before and after receiving the posted resources. The records (n = 226) were scored blindly by the researchers using the framework. A subgroup of CPD records (n = 96) submitted first (before-stage) and rewritten (after-stage) were analysed separately. Main outcome measure Scores for CPD records received before and after distributing group-dependent material through the post. Results Using a linear-regression model both analyses found an increase in CPD scores in favour of the active intervention group. For the complete set of records, the effect was a mean difference of 9.9 (95 % CI 0.4–19.3), p value = 0.04. For the subgroup of rewritten records, the effect was a mean difference of 17.3 (95 % CI 5.6–28.9), p value = 0.0048. Conclusion The intervention improved participants’ CPD behaviour. Training pharmacy professionals to use the framework resulted in better CPD activities and CPD records, potentially helpful for revalidation of pharmacy professionals.
KeywordsContinuing professional development (CPD) Credentialing Comparative effectiveness research Pharmacy United Kingdom
We thank the RPSGB research steering committee, CPPE, Rebecca Herbert, Pam Denicolo, and the University’s Statistical Services Centre.
This study was supported by the RPSGB with Department of Health funding.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
- 1.Department of Health. The white paper trust, assurance and safety: the regulation of health professionals. In: Crown (ed) Department of Health, 2007. ISBN 9780101701327.Google Scholar
- 2.General Medical Council. The good medical practice framework for appraisal and revalidation. General Medical Council (2011). p 8. http://www.gmc-uk.org/GMP_framework_for_appraisal_and_revalidation.pdf_41326960.pdf.
- 3.General Dental Council. Continuing professional development (CPD) for dental care professionals. London: General Dental Council. (2011) p 20. https://www.gdcuk.org/Newsandpublications/Publications/Publications/ContinuingProfessionalDevelopmentforDentalProfessionals.pdf.
- 4.Hasman A. Get ready for revalidation in pharmacy. Pharm J. 2009;283:486.Google Scholar
- 5.International Pharmaceutical Federation. FIP statement of professional standards: continuing professional development. The Netherlands: International Pharmaceutical Federation. 2002. p 4. http://www.fip.org/www/uploads/database_file.php?id=221&table_id=.
- 6.Royal pharmaceutical society of Great Britain. Plan and record for pharmacists and pharmacy technicians. 2009. http://www.uptodate.org.uk/PlanandRecord/version4/PlanandRecordVersion14CompleteGuidancePack.pdf.
- 7.Executive agency for health and consumers. Study concerning the review and mapping of continuous professional development and lifelong learning for health professionals in the EU. 2013. p 448. http://ec.europa.eu/health/workforce/docs/cpd_mapping_report_en.pdf.
- 8.International Pharmaceutical Federation. Continuing professional development/continuing education in pharmacy: global report. The Netherlands: International Pharmaceutical Federation. 2014. p 46. http://www.fip.org/files/fip/PharmacyEducation/CPD_CE_report/FIP_2014_Global_Report_CPD_CE_online_version.pdf.
- 9.Pharmacy Council of New Zealand. Recertification framework and guidelines. 2012. p 15. http://www.pharmacycouncil.org.nz/cms_show_download.php?id=295.
- 10.General Pharmaceutical Council. Standards for continuing professional development. 2010. p 5. http://www.pharmacyregulation.org/sites/default/files/Standards%20for%20continuing%20professional%20development%20s.pdf.
- 13.Anonymous. Draft future standards for the pharmacy profession have been published for consultation. Pharm J. 2009;283:435.Google Scholar
- 16.Burgess S,Natalie LeBlanc N, Rainkie D, Roels C, Louie S. Are standardized knowledge assessment exams the best way to assess a pharmacist’s competence and should they be a mandatory component of licence renewal?. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2014;67(4):304–7.Google Scholar
- 17.Biggs J. Teaching for quality learning at University. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University; 2003. ISBN 0-335-21168-2.Google Scholar