Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 601–606 | Cite as

Development of a pharmacy practice intervention: lessons from the literature

  • Carmel M. HughesEmail author
  • Cathal A. Cadogan
  • Cristín A. Ryan
Commentary

Abstract

The development of health interventions is receiving increasing attention within the scientific literature. In the past, interventions were often based on the ISLAGIATT principle: that is, ‘It seemed like a good idea at the time’. However, such interventions were frequently ineffective because they were either delivered in part or not at all, demonstrating a lack of fidelity, or because little attention had been paid to their development, content, and mode of delivery. This commentary seeks to highlight the latest methodological advances in the field of intervention development, drawing on health psychology literature, together with guidance from key organisations and research consortia which are setting standards for development and reporting. Those working within pharmacy practice research can learn from the more systematic approach being advocated, and apply these methods to help generate evidence to support new services and professional roles.

Keywords

Behaviour change Intervention Theoretical domains framework 

Notes

Acknowledgments

CA Cadogan is currently being supported by a project grant from the Dunhill Medical Trust [Grant No. R298/0513] focusing on the development of an intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care.

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Godlee F. We need to put the evidence to work. BMJ. 2009;339:b5236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Michie S, Fixsen D, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP. Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci. 2009;4:40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernsten C, Bjorkman I, Caramona M, Crealey G, Frokjaer B, Grundberger E, et al. Improving the well-being of elderly patients via community pharmacy based provision of pharmaceutical care. Drugs Aging. 2001;18:63–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Patterson SM, Hughes CM, Crealey G, Cardwell C, Lapane K. An evaluation of an adapted United States model of pharmaceutical care to improve psychoactive prescribing for nursing home residents in Northern Ireland (Fleetwood NI Study). J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:44–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wazaify M, Hughes CM, McElnay JC. The implementation of a harm minimization model for the identification and treatment of over-the-counter drug misuse and abuse in community pharmacies in Northern Ireland. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64:136–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. 1st ed. London: Silverback Publishing; 2014.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Page MJ, French SD, McKenzie JE, O’Connor DA, Green SE. Recruitment difficulties in a primary care cluster randomised trial: investigating factors contributing to general practitioners’ recruitment of patients. BMC Med Res Method. 2011;11:35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peters-Klimm F, Campbell S, Muller-Tasch T, Schellberg D, Gelbrich G, Herzog W, et al. Primary care-based multifaceted, interdisciplinary medical educational intervention for patients with systolic heart failure: lessons learned from a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2009;10:68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Medical Research Council. A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Medical Research Council. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance, 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Michie SM, Johnston C, Abraham R, Lawton D, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:26–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG). Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implement Sci. 2006;1:4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grol R, Bosch MC, Hulscher MEJL, Eccles MP, Wensin M. Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q. 2007;85:93–138.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Michie S, West R, Campbell R, Brown J, Gaisforth H. ABC of behaviour change theories. 1st ed. London: Silverback Publishing; 2014.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Francis JJ, O’Connor D, Curran J. Theories of behaviour change synthesised into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7:35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    French SD, Green SE, O’Connor DA, McKenzie JE, Francis JJ, et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach suing the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7:38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behaviour change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles M. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behavior change techniques. Appl Psychol. 2008;57:660–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cane J, Richardson M, Johnston M, Ladha R, Michie S. From lists of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to structured hierarchies: comparison of two methods of developing a hierarchies of BCTs. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;20:130–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    French SD, McKenzie JE, O’Connor DA, Grimshaw JM, Mortimer D, Francis JJ, et al. Evaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute lower back pain in general medical practice: the implement cluster randomised trial. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e65471.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cadogan CA, Ryan C, Gormley GJ, Passmore P, Francis J, Kerse N, et al. Prescribing appropriate polypharmacy for older people in primary care: a qualitative study of general practitioners’ perceptions and experiences. Int J Pharm Pract. 2015;23:9–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oxman AD, Fretheim A, Flottorp S. The OFF theory of research utilization. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:113–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bhattacharyya O, Reeves S, Garfinkel S, Zwarenstein M. Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions: fine in theory, but evidence of effectiveness in practice is needed. Implement Sci. 2006;1:5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schultz K, Altman D, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT. Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Reporting (WIDER). Improving reporting of behavioural interventions: WIDER consensus statement, 2009. http://interventiondesign.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/wider-recommendations.pdf.
  28. 28.
    Albrecht L, Archibald M, Arseneau D, Scott SD. Development of a checklist to assess the quality of reporting of knowledge translation interventions using the Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research (WIDER) recommendations. Implement Sci. 2013;8:52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij ter bevordering der Pharmacie 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carmel M. Hughes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cathal A. Cadogan
    • 1
  • Cristín A. Ryan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PharmacyQueen’s University BelfastBelfastNorthern Ireland, UK

Personalised recommendations