International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp 1086–1094 | Cite as

Describing interruptions, multi-tasking and task-switching in community pharmacy: a qualitative study in England

  • Victoria. M. LeaEmail author
  • Sarah A. Corlett
  • Ruth M. Rodgers
Research Article


Background There is growing evidence around interruptions, multi-tasking and task-switching in the community pharmacy setting. There is also evidence to suggest some of these practices may be associated with dispensing errors. Up to date, qualitative research on this subject is limited. Objective To explore interruptions, multi-tasking and task-switching in the community setting; utilising an ethnographic approach to provide a detailed description of the circumstances surrounding such practices.Setting Community pharmacies in England, July–October 2011. Method An ethnographic approach was taken. Non participant, unstructured observations were utilised to make records of pharmacists’ every activity. Case studies were formed by combining field notes with detailed information on pharmacists and their respective pharmacy businesses. Content analysis was undertaken both manually and electronically, using NVivo 10. Main outcome measure To determine the factors influencing interruptions, multitasking and task-switching in the community pharmacy setting. Results Response rate was 12 % (n = 11). Over fifteen days, a total of 123 h and 58 min of observations were recorded in 11 separate pharmacies of 11 individual pharmacists. The sample was evenly split by gender (female n = 6; male n = 5) and pharmacy ownership (independent n = 5; multiple n = 6). Employment statuses included employee pharmacists (n = 6), owners (n = 4) and a locum (n = 1). Average period of registration as a pharmacist was 19 years (range 5–39 years). Average prescription busyness of pharmacies ranged from 2600 to 24,000 items dispensed per month. All observed pharmacists’ work was dominated by interruptions, task-switches, distractions and multi-tasking, often to manage a barrage of conflicting demands. These practices were observed to be part of a deep-rooted culture in the community setting. In particular, support staff regularly contributed to interruptions and distractions for pharmacists; pharmacists in turn continued to permit these. Novel directional work maps illustrated the extent and direction of task-switching and multi-tasking employed by pharmacists. Conclusions In this study pharmacists’ working practices were permeated by interruptions, distractions and multi-tasking. Task-switching was also frequently employed by pharmacists. Changes to working practices by both pharmacists and support staff would help to minimise these which in turn has the potential to lead to safer and more efficient methods of working.


Community pharmacy England Interruptions Multi-tasking Task-switching Observations 



The authors would like to thank Medway School of Pharmacy for supporting this research as part of a PhD programme.


This research was completed as part of a Medway School of Pharmacy funded PhD programme; no other funding was provided.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.


  1. 1.
    McCann L, Adair CG, Hughes CM. An exploration of work-related stress in Northern Ireland community pharmacy: a qualitative study. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009;17:261–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McCann L, Hughes CM, Adair CG, Cardwell C. Assessing job satisfaction and stress among pharmacists in Northern Ireland. Pharm World Sci. 2009;31:188–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashcroft D, Quinlan P, Blenkinsopp A. Prospective study of the incidence, nature and causes of dispensing errors in community pharmacies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14:327–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Family H, Weiss M, Sutton J. The effects of mental workload on community pharmacists’ ability to detect dispensing errors. Pharm Res UK 2013;1–121.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pederson G, Wu M, Bergin J. Pharmacists attitudes towards dispensing errors: their causes and prevention. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1999;24:57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flynn E, Barker K, Gibson J, Pearson R, Berger B, Smith L. Impact of interruptions and distractions on dispensing errors in an ambulatory care pharmacy. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1999;56:1319–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knudsen P, Herborg H, Mortensen A, Knudsen M, Hellebek A. Preventing medication errors in community pharmacy: root cause analysis of transcription errors. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:285–90.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    James K, Barlow D, McArtney R, Hiom S, Roberts D, Whittlesea C. Incidence, type and causes of dispensing errors: a review of the literature. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009;17:9–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beso A, Franklin B, Barber N. The frequency and potential causes of dispensing errors in a hospital pharmacy. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27:182–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    James K, Barlow D, Hiom S, Roberts D, Whittlesea C. Development and use of the critical incident technique in evaluating the causes of dispensing incidents. Int J Pharm Pract. 2008;16:239–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kistner U, Keith M, Sergeant K, Hokanson J. Accuracy of dispensing in a high-volume, hospital based outpatient pharmacy. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994;51(22):2793–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Central Region’s Technical Advisory Service: What is the community pharmacy services programme about? [updated 2015; cited 9 June 2015].
  13. 13.
    Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee. London: essential services.[updated 2015; cited 9 June 2015].
  14. 14.
    Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee. London: advanced services. [updated 2015; cited 9 June 2015 ].
  15. 15.
    Locally commissioned services. Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee. London: Locally Commissioned Services. [updated 2015; cited 9 June 2015].
  16. 16.
    Gidman W. Increasing community pharmacy workloads in England: causes and consequences. Int J Clin Pharm. 2011;33:512–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gidman W, Hassell K, Day J, Payne K. The impact of increasing workloads and role expansion on female community pharmacists in the United Kingdom. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006;3:285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gidley S. Don’t get left behind. Pharm J 2012 Apr online only. (cited 2015 June 9).
  19. 19.
    Churton S. Workplace pressure: open letter from the President to all Members. PharmJ. 2009;282:103.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bond C, Blenkinsopp A, Inch J, Celino G, Gray N. The effect of the new community pharmacy contract on the community pharmacy workforce: Report prepared for The Pharmacy Practice Research Trust. The Pharmacy Practice Research Trust; 2008 p.1–34.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eden M, Schafheutle E, Hassell K. Workload pressure among recently qualified pharmacists: an exploratory study of intentions to leave the profession. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009;17:181–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shann P, Hassell K. Flexible working: understanding the locum pharmacist in Great Britain. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006;2:388–407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Health and Social Care Information Centre. General pharmaceutical services: England 2004–2005 to 2013–2014. London: HSCIC; 2014. p. 39.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bradley F, Schafeutle E, Willis S, Noyce P. Supervision in community pharmacy: Final report to pharmacy research UK. Pharmacy Research UK 2013:1–112.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harvey J, Avery A, Ashcroft D, Boyd M, Phipps D, Barber N. Exploring safety systems for dispensing in community pharmacies: focusing on how staff relate to organizational components. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014;11(2):216–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Westbrook J, Coeira E, Dunsmuir W, Brown B, Kelk N, Paoloni R, et al. The impact of interruptions on clinical task completion. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:284–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Westbrook J, Woods A, Rob M, Dunsmuir W, Day R. Association of interruptions with increased risk and severity of medication administration errors. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:683–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Westbrook J, Ampt A, Kearney L, Rob M. All in a day’s work: an observational study to quantify how and with whom doctors on hospital wards spend their time. Med J Aust. 2008;188:506–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ulanimo V, O’Leary-Kelley C, Connolly P. Nurses’ perceptions of causes of medication errors and barriers to reporting. J Nurs Care Qual. 2007;22:28–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ly T, Korb-Wells C, Sumpton D, Russo R, Barnsley L. Nature and impact of interruptions on clinical workflow of medical residents in the inpatient setting. J Graduate Med Educ. 2013;5:232–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chisholm C, Collison K, Nelson D, Cordell W. Emergency department workplace interruptions: are emergency physicians “Interrupt-driven” and “Multi-tasking”? Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:1239–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Coiera E, Jayasuriya R, Hardy J, Bannan A, Thorpe M. Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department. Med J Aust. 2002;176:415–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rubinstein J, Meyer D, Evans J. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001;27:763–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kirsch D. A few thoughts on cognitive overload. Intellictica. 2000;30:19–51.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Monsell S. Task Switching. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7:134–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Flynn E, Barker K, Gibson J, Pearson R, Smith L, Berger B. Relationships between ambient sounds and the accuracy of pharmacists’ prescription-filling performance. Hum Fact. 1996;38:614–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative Research: observational methods in health care settings. BMJ. 1995;311:182–4.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij ter bevordering der Pharmacie 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria. M. Lea
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sarah A. Corlett
    • 1
  • Ruth M. Rodgers
    • 1
  1. 1.Medway School of PharmacyChathamUK

Personalised recommendations