Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 917–924 | Cite as

Patients’ reasons for accepting a free community pharmacy asthma service

  • Susanne KaaeEmail author
  • Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong
Research Article

Abstract

Background Challenges in recruiting patients at the pharmacy counter for cognitive services have been observed, hampering development in this area. To overcome this barrier, insight into the patient perspective is crucial to understanding their lack of appreciation of the services. However, very few studies have been conducted so far to explore why patients accept or decline offers of cognitive services at the pharmacy counter. Objective To explore patients’ reasons for accepting a particular cognitive service (the Inhaler Technique Assessment Service) a service intended to detect inhalation technique errors. The service is reimbursed by the Danish state and takes approximately 10 min. Setting Ten community pharmacies located in different regions of Denmark, including the center and suburbs of Copenhagen. Method Two types of interviews were conducted: long and short semi-structured interviews with 24 patients suffering mainly from asthma and COPD. Researchers from Copenhagen University conducted 11 long interviews and pharmacy internship students from Copenhagen University carried out 13 short interviews. The interviews were analyzed using descriptive analysis. Main outcome measure Patients’ perceived needs of an inhalation counseling service as well as their motivation for accepting the service, including their accounts of how the service was orally offered by staff. Results The majority of participants were used to using inhaler devices. The participants felt, for several reasons, little need of an inhaler service and seldom noticed the precise way the service was offered. Patients did not seem to accept the service expecting personal benefits. First timers appeared to accept the service to learn how to use the device correctly, whereas experienced users appeared to accept the ITAS to be helpful to staff or to learn more about health issues in general or were convinced by individual employees who showed a special interest in the participant receiving the service. Privacy problems were felt by several participants. Conclusion The patients felt little need for the inhaler counseling service. Patients however accepted the service for various reasons of which the feeling how staff showing an interest in helping them seemed especially convincing.

Keywords

Cognitive services Community pharmacy Denmark Inhaler technique Recruitment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Asmah Barzak, Kristine Aarup Hallberg Friis, Katrine Kanne, Somia Mohammad, Rikke Rishøj and Joanna Sadiq for their contributions in connection with conducting interviews during their pharmacy internship.

Funding

Actavis granted 20.000 DKr. for expenses of the study, i.e., transcriptions of interviews and presents for participants.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Latif A, Pollock K, Boardman H. Why do patients accept or decline the invitation for a medicines use review. Int J Pharm Pract. 2010;18:21.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Herborg H, Soendergaard B, Froekjaer B, Fonnesbaek L, Jorgensen T, Hepler CD, Grainger-Rousseau TJ, Ersboell BK. Improving drug therapy for patients with asthma—part 1: patient outcomes. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2001;41(4):539–50.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mangiapane S, Schulz M, Mühlig S, Ihle P, Schubert I, Waldmann HC. Community pharmacy-based pharmaceutical care for asthma patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39(11):1817–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaae S, Traulsen JM, Søndergaard B, Haugbølle LS. The relevance of political prestudies for implementation studies of cognitive services in community pharmacies. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2009;5(2):189–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Naik-Panvelkar P, Saini B, Lemay KS, Emmerton LM, Stewart K, Burton DL, Bosnic-Anticevich SZ, Krass I, Smith LD, Armour CL. A pharmacy asthma service achieves a change in patient responses from increased awareness to taking responsibility for their asthma. Int J Pharm Pract. 2015;23:182–1916.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Royal Pharmaceutical Scociety. Support for New Medicine Service. 2015. http://www.rpharms.com/nhs-community-pharmacy-contract-england/new-medicine-service.asp. Cited 4 May 2015.
  7. 7.
    Emmerton LM, Smith L, Lemay KS, Krass I, Saini B, Bonic-Anticevich SZ, reddel HK, Burton DL, Stewart K, Armour CL. Experiences of community pharmacists involved in the delivery of a specialist asthma service in Australia. BMC Health Serv res. 2012;12:164.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaae S, Nørgaard LS. How to engage experienced medicine users at the counter for a pharmacy-based asthma inhaler service. Int J Pharm Pract. 2012;20:99–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Pound P, Britten N, Morgan M, Yardley L, Pope C, Daker-White G, et al. Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:133–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage; 2002.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cavaco AM, Sousa Dias JP, Bates IP. Consumers’ perceptions of community pharmacy in Portugal: a qualitative exploratory study. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27:54–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Assa-Eley M, Kimberlin CL. Using interpersonal perception to characterize pharmacists’ and patients’perceptions of the benefits of pharmaceutical care. Health Commun. 2005;17:41–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abukres SH, Hoti K, Hughes JD. Patient attitudes towards a new role for pharmacists: continued dispensing. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014;8:1143–51.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saramunee K, Krska J, Mackridge A, Richards J, Suttajit S, Phillips-Howard P. How to enhance public service utilization in community pharmacy? general public and health providers’ perspectives. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014;10(2):272–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tucker R, Stewart D. Why people seek advice from community pharmacy about skin problems. Int J Pharm Pract. 2015;23(2):150–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peremans L, Verhoeven V, Phillips H, Denekens J, Van Royen P. How does a belgian care provider deal with a request for emergency contraception? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007;12(4):317–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Panvelkar NP, Armour C, Saini B. Community pharmacy-based asthma services—what do patients prefer? J Asthma. 2010;47(10):1085–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij ter bevordering der Pharmacie 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section for Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen ØDenmark

Personalised recommendations