Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 1115–1125 | Cite as

Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta versus darbepoetin alfa for anemia in non-dialysis-dependent CKD: a systematic review

  • Noor Alsalimy
  • Ahmed AwaisuEmail author
Review Article

Abstract

Background Anemia management in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is associated with cardiovascular and cost benefits, slows decline in renal function, and prevents mortality. Different reviews have focused on evaluating the safety and efficacy of methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (MPG-EPO), a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, in CKD patients regardless of dialysis dependency and others have studied this novel agent exclusively in CKD patients receiving dialysis. Aim of the review To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of MPG-EPO compared with other erythropoiesis stimulating agents (in particular darbepoetin alfa) for the treatment of anemia in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients. Methods A systematic review of original studies published mainly in MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, clinical trials registries, and Google Scholar was carried out to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MPG-EPO with other erythropoiesis stimulating agents or placebo among patients with anemia of CKD who were not yet receiving dialysis. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers using standardized data abstraction tool. Results Four trials involving 1,155 patients were included in the review. The changes in hemoglobin level from the baseline reported by the reviewed studies demonstrate that MPG-EPO was clinically non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa. In addition, the studies documented that MPG-EPO-treated patients experienced a lower rate of hemoglobin level above the target range of 12–13 g/dL than darbepoetin-treated patients. The proportion of patients requiring RBC transfusion was higher among patients who received darbepoetin alfa than those who received MPG-EPO. However, the time to hemoglobin response was longer with MPG-EPO than with darbepoetin. Finally, the incidences of serious adverse events were similar between the two therapeutic agents. Conclusion There are currently only few well-designed head-to-head RCTs investigating the efficacy and safety of MPG-EPO compared with other ESAs in non-dialysis-dependent patients. MPG-EPO therapy compared with darbepoetin alfa has demonstrated favorable effects of increasing and maintaining hemoglobin concentrations to recommended target levels. This mini-review is not conclusive due to limited number of studies. Therefore, the beneficial effects and tolerability of MPG-EPO among non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients should be further investigated, given the economic and clinical benefits of managing anemia in this population.

Keywords

Anemia CERA Chronic kidney disease EPO Erythropoiesis stimulating agent Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta Pre-dialysis Review 

Notes

Funding

This study was self-initiated and self-supported; no funding was obtained for the conduct of the study.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Astor BC, Muntner P, Levin A, Eustace JA, Coresh J. Association of kidney function with anemia: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988–1994). Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1401–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McClellan W, Aronoff SL, Bolton WK, Hood S, Lorber DL, Tang KL, et al. The prevalence of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20:1501–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes and CKD: 2012 Update. AJKD. 2012;60:850–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McCarley P. The KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for treating anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: implications for nurses. Nephrol Nurs J. 2006;33:423–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Silverberg DS, Wexler D, Iaina A, Steinbruch S, Wollman Y, Schwartz D. Anemia, chronic renal disease and congestive heart failure—the cardio renal anemia syndrome: the need for cooperation between cardiologists and nephrologists. Int J Nephrol Urol. 2006;38:295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Besarab A, Salifu MO, Lunde NM, Bansal V, Fishbane S, Dougherty FC, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of intravenous continuous erythropoietin receptor activator: a 19-week, phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label, dose-finding study with a 12-month extension phase in patients with chronic renal disease. Clin Ther. 2007;29:626–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ershler WB, Chen K, Reyes EB, Dubois R. Economic burden of patients with anemia in selected diseases. Value Heal. 2005;8:629–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Astor BC, Coresh J, Heiss G, Pettitt D, Sarnak MJ. Kidney function and anemia as risk factors for coronary heart disease and mortality: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Am Hear J. 2006;151:492–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    US rHuEPO Predialysis Study Group. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the therapeutic use of recombinant human erythropoietin for anemia associated with chronic renal failure in predialysis patients The US Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Predialysis Study Group. AJKD. 1991;18:50–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Locatelli F, Del Vecchio L. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in renal medicine. Oncologist. 2011;16(Suppl 3):19–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Macdougall IC. Novel erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: a new era in anemia management. CJASN. 2008;3:200–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Halstenson CE, Macres M, Katz SA, Schnieders JR, Watanabe M, Sobota JT, et al. Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of epoetin alfa and epoetin beta. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1991;50:702–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Macdougall IC, Gray SJ, Elston O, Breen C, Jenkins B, Browne J, et al. Pharmacokinetics of novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein compared with epoetin alfa in dialysis patients. JASN. 1999;10:2392–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Macdougall IC. Optimizing the use of erythropoietic agents—pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations. Neph Dial Trans. 2002;17(Suppl 5):66–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robinson DM, Easthope SE. Darbepoetin alfa: its use in anemia associated with chronic kidney disease. BioDrugs. 2005;19:327–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ohashi N, Sakao Y, Yasuda H, Kato A, Fujigaki Y. Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta for anemia with chronic kidney disease. Int J Nephrol Renov Dis. 2012;5:53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Locatelli F, Aljama P, Bárány P, Canaud B, Carrera F, Eckardt K-U, et al. Revised European best practice guidelines for the management of anaemia in patients with chronic renal failure. Neph Dial Trans. 2004;19(Suppl 2):ii1–47.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carrera F, Disney A, Molina M. Extended dosing intervals with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in chronic kidney disease: a review of clinical data. Neph Dial Trans. 2007;22(Suppl 4):iv19–30.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Macdougall IC, Roberts DE, Coles GA, Williams JD. Clinical pharmacokinetics of epoetin (recombinant human erythropoietin). Clin Pharmacokinet. 1991;20:99–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Macdougall IC, Padhi D, Jang G. Pharmacology of darbepoetin alfa. Neph Dial Trans. 2007;22(Suppl 4):iv2–9.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Macdougall IC, Robson R, Opatrna S, Liogier X, Pannier A, Jordan P, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous and subcutaneous continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1:1211–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Topf JM. CERA: third-generation erythropoiesis-stimulating agent. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008;9:839–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Macdougall IC, Robson R, Opatrna S, Liogier X, Pannier A, Jordan P, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous and subcutaneous continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A) in patients with chronic kidney disease. CJASN. 2006;1:1211–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roche. Mircera (methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta)—Product Information 2011.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Provenzano R, Besarab A, Macdougall IC, Ellison DH, Maxwell AP, Sulowicz W, et al. The continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) corrects anemia at extended administration intervals in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis: results of a phase II study. Clin Neph. 2007;67:306–17.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Levin NW, Fishbane S, Cañedo FV, Zeig S, Nassar GM, Moran JE, et al. Intravenous methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta for haemoglobin control in patients with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis: a randomised non-inferiority trial (MAXIMA). Lancet. 2007;370:1415–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sulowicz W, Locatelli F, Ryckelynck J-P, Balla J, Csiky B, Harris K, et al. Once-monthly subcutaneous CERA maintains stable hemoglobin control in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis and converted directly from epoetin one to three times weekly. CJASN. 2007;2:637–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Drüeke TB, Locatelli F, Clyne N, Eckardt K-U, Macdougall IC, Tsakiris D, et al. Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia. NEJM. 2006;355:2071–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Panchapakesan U, Sumual S, Pollock C. Nanomedicines in the treatment of anemia in renal disease: focus on CERA (Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator). Int J Nanomedicine. 2007;2:33–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taéron C. Methoxy polyethylene glycol epoetin beta. Rev Infirm. 2010;159:47–9.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schmidt RJ. Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta: worth waiting for or a novelty worn off? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009;10:1509–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Curran MP, McCormack PL. Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta: a review of its use in the management of anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease. Drugs. 2008;68:1139–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Macdougall IC. New anemia therapies: translating novel strategies from bench to bedside. AJKD. 2012;59:444–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fink J, Blahut S, Reddy M, Light P. Use of erythropoietin before the initiation of dialysis and its impact on mortality. AJKD. 2001;37:348–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Collins AJ. Anaemia management prior to dialysis: cardiovascular and cost-benefit observations. Neph Dial Trans. 2003;18(Suppl 2):ii2–6.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gouva C, Nikolopoulos P, Ioannidis JPA, Siamopoulos KC. Treating anemia early in renal failure patients slows the decline of renal function: a randomized controlled trial. Kid Inter. 2004;66:753–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Aizawa K, Takeda S, Tashiro Y, Yorozu K, Hirata M, Kanada H, et al. Renoprotection by continuous erythropoietin receptor activator in puromycin aminonucleoside-induced nephrotic syndrome. Am J Nephrol. 2012;36:419–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Singh AK, Szczech L, Tang KL, Barnhart H, Sapp S, Wolfson M, et al. Correction of anemia with epoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease. NEJM. 2006;355:2085–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pfeffer MA, Burdmann EA, Chen C-Y, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Eckardt K-U, et al. A trial of darbepoetin alfa in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. NEJM. 2009;361:2019–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Higgins JPT, Green S. Guide to the contents of a cochrane protocol and review. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The cochrane collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  41. 41.
    Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Con Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Roger SD, Locatelli F, Woitas RP, Laville M, Tobe SW, Provenzano R, et al. C.E.R.A. once every 4 weeks corrects anaemia and maintains haemoglobin in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis. Neph Dial Trans. 2011;26:3980–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Macdougall IC, Walker R, Provenzano R, de Alvaro F, Locay HR, Nader PC, et al. C.E.R.A. corrects anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis: results of a randomized clinical trial. CJASN. 2008;3:337–47.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kessler M, Martínez-Castelao A, Siamopoulos KC, Villa G, Spinowitz B, Dougherty FC, et al. C.E.R.A. once every 4 weeks in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis: The ARCTOS extension study. Hemodial Int. 2010;14:233–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hoffmann-La Roche. A study of subcutaneous mircera in patients with chronic kidney disease, not on dialysis. 2011. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00442702.
  47. 47.
    Locatelli F, Villa G, de Francisco ALM, Albertazzi A, Adrogue HJ, Dougherty FC, et al. Effect of a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) on stable haemoglobin in patients with CKD on dialysis: once monthly administration. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23:969–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Carrera F, Lok CE, de Francisco A, Locatelli F, Mann JFE, Canaud B, et al. Maintenance treatment of renal anaemia in haemodialysis patients with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta versus darbepoetin alfa administered monthly: a randomized comparative trial. Neph Dial Trans. 2010;25:4009–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Seliger SL, Zhang AD, Weir MR, Walker L, Hsu VD, Parsa A, et al. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents increase the risk of acute stroke in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kid Inter. 2011;80:288–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mapes DL, Lopes AA, Satayathum S, McCullough KP, Goodkin DA, Locatelli F, et al. Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Kid Inter. 2003;64:339–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Macdougall IC, Obrador GT. How important is transfusion avoidance in 2013? Neph Dial Trans. 2013;28:1092–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Choi J-Y, Yang CW, Kim Y-H, Joo KW, Yoo T-H, Lee KW, et al. Effect of conversion from ESA with shorter half-life to CERA once monthly for maintaining Hb concentration in pre-dialysis CKD patients. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2013;37:259–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    O’Mara NB. Anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Spectr. 2008;21:12–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Beyer-Westendorf J, Büller H. External and internal validity of open label or double-blind trials in oral anticoagulation: better, worse or just different? J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:2153–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Taylor GJ, Wainwright P. Open label extension studies: research or marketing? BMJ. 2005;331:572–4.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Aggarwal HK, Jain D, Verma K. Efficacy and safety of continuous erythorpoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A) in patients of chronic renal failure with anemia. Int. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2011;3:292–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij ter bevordering der Pharmacie 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geriatrics SectionRumailah HospitalDohaQatar
  2. 2.College of PharmacyQatar UniversityDohaQatar

Personalised recommendations