Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 1144–1151 | Cite as

Cultural barriers encountered by Norwegian community pharmacists in providing service to non-Western immigrant patients

  • Helle HåkonsenEmail author
  • Karine Lees
  • Else-Lydia Toverud
Research Article

Abstract

Background Western societies’ need for knowledge about how to meet the challenges in health care following increased immigration has emerged as studies have showed that non-Western immigrants tend to experience more obstacles to drug use and poorer communication with health professionals. Objectives To identify the cultural barriers encountered by Norwegian community pharmacists in providing service to non-Western immigrant patients and to outline how they are being addressed. Setting Community pharmacies in Oslo, Norway. Methods A qualitative study consisting of four focus groups was conducted. In total 19 ethnic Norwegian pharmacists (17 female and 2 male; mean age: 40.6 years) participated. They were recruited from 13 pharmacies situated in areas of Oslo densely populated by non-Western immigrants. The audio-records of the focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim. A thematic content analysis was conducted. Main outcome measure Cultural barriers identified by Norwegian community pharmacists in the encounter with non-Western immigrants. Results All the pharmacists were in contact with non-Western immigrant patients on a daily basis. They said that they found it challenging to provide adequate service to these patients, and that the presence of language as well as other cultural barriers not only affected what the patients got out of the available information, but also to a great extent what kind of and how much information was provided. Although the pharmacists felt that immigrant patients were in great need of drug counselling, there were large disparities in how much effort was exerted in order to provide this service. They were all uncomfortable with situations where family or friends acted as interpreters, especially children. Otherwise, cultural barriers were related to differences in body language and clothing which they thought distracted the communication. All the pharmacists stated that they had patients asking about the content of pork gelatin in medicines, but few said that they habitually notified the patients of this unless they were asked directly. Ramadan fasting was not identified as a subject during drug counselling. Conclusion This focus group study shows that language and other cultural barriers, including differences in body language, non-Western gender roles, and all-covering garments, are of great concern for ethnic Norwegian community pharmacists in the encounter with non-Western immigrant patients. Although the pharmacists recognise their role as drug information providers for immigrant patients, large disparities were detected with respect to kind of and amount of information provided to these patients.

Keywords

Cultural barriers Ethnicity Immigrant Language problems Medicine use Pharmacy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the pharmacists who participated in the study.

Funding

Financial support was given by the Norwegian Pharmaceutical Society.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Statistics Norway. Immigrants and Norwegian-born to immigrant parents. 1 January 2013. http://ssb.no/en/befolkning/statistikker/innvbef. Accessed 12 Mar 2014.
  2. 2.
    Horne R, Graupner L, Frost S, Weinman J, Wright SM, Hankins M. Medicine in a multi-cultural society: the effect of cultural background on beliefs about medications. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(6):1307–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kumar K, Gordon C, Toescu V, et al. Beliefs about medicines in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison between patients of South Asian and White British origin. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(5):690–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lawton J, Ahmad N, Hallowell N, Hanna L, Douglas M. Perceptions and experiences of taking oral hypoglycaemic agents among people of Pakistani and Indian origin: qualitative study. BMJ. 2005;330(7502):1247.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lip GY, Khan H, Bhatnagar A, et al. Ethnic differences in patient perceptions of heart failure and treatment: the West Birmingham heart failure project. Heart. 2004;90(9):1016–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Wieringen JC, Harmsen JA, Bruijnzeels MA. Intercultural communication in general practice. Eur J Public Health. 2002;12(1):63–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bleich SN, Jarlenski MP, Bell CN, LaVeist TA. Health inequalities: trends, progress, and policy. Annu Rev Public Health. 2012;33:7–40.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hawthorne K, Robles Y, Cannings-John R, Edwards AG. Culturally appropriate health education for Type 2 diabetes in ethnic minority groups: a systematic and narrative review of randomized controlled trials. Diabet Med. 2010;27(6):613–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith GD, Chaturvedi N, Harding S, Nazroo J, Williams R. Ethnic inequalities in health: a review of UK epidemiological evidence. Crit Public Health. 2000;10(4):375–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Syed HR, Dalgard OS, Hussain A, Dalen I, Claussen B, Ahlberg NL. Inequalities in health: a comparative study between ethnic Norwegians and Pakistanis in Oslo, Norway. Int J Equity Health. 2006;29(5):7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tran AT, Straand J, Diep LM, Meyer HE, Birkeland KI, Jenum AK. Cardiovascular disease by diabetes status in five ethnic minority groups compared to ethnic Norwegians. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:554.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Håkonsen H, Toverud EL. Special challenges for drug adherence following generic substitution in Pakistani immigrants living in Norway. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67(2):193–201.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rabanal KS, Lindman AS, Selmer RM, Aamodt G. Ethnic differences in risk factors and total risk of cardiovascular disease based on the Norwegian CONOR study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013;20(6):1013–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jenum AK, Holme I, Graff-Iversen S, Birkeland KI. Ethnicity and sex are strong determinants of diabetes in an urban Western society: implications for prevention. Diabetologia. 2005;48(3):435–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Håkonsen H, Toverud EL. Cultural influences on medicine use among first-generation Pakistani immigrants in Norway. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;68(2):171–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tran AT, Diep LM, Cooper JG, et al. Quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice according to patients’ ethnic background: a cross-sectional study from Oslo, Norway. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;28(10):145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scheppers E, van Dongen E, Dekker J, Geertzen J, Dekker J. Potential barriers to the use of health services among ethnic minorities: a review. Fam Pract. 2006;23(3):325–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murray-García JL, Selby JV, Schmittdiel J, Grumbach K, Quesenberry CPJ. Racial and ethnic differences in a patient survey: patients’ values, ratings, and reports regarding physician primary care performance in a large health maintenance organization. Med Care. 2000;38(3):300–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tucker CM, Herman KC, Pedersen TR, Higley B, Montrichard M, Ivery P. Cultural sensitivity in physician-patient relationships: perspectives of an ethnically diverse sample of low-income primary care patients. Med Care. 2003;41(7):859–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harmsen JA, Bernsen RM, Bruijnzeels MA, Meeuwesen L. Patients’ evaluation of quality of care in general practice: what are the cultural and linguistic barriers? Patient Educ Couns. 2008;72(1):155–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferguson WJ, Candib LM. Culture, language, and the doctor-patient relationship. Fam Med. 2002;34(5):353–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Håkonsen H, Eilertsen M, Borge H, Toverud EL. Generic substitution: additional challenge for adherence in hypertensive patients? Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25(10):2515–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hov I, Bjartnes M, Slørdal L, Spigset O. Are drugs taken as prescribed? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012;132(4):418–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cleland JA, Watson MC, Walker L, Denison A, Vanes N, Moffat M. Community pharmacists’ perceptions of barriers to communication with migrants. Int J Pharm Pract. 2012;20(3):148–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mygind A, Espersen S, Nørgaard LS, Traulsen JM. Encounters with immigrant customers: perspectives of Danish community pharmacy staff on challenges and solutions. Int J Pharm Pract. 2013;21(3):139–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Young HN, Dilworth TJ, Mott DA, Cox ED, Moreno MA, Brown RL. Pharmacists’ provision of information to Spanish-speaking patients: a social cognitive approach. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013;9(1):4–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wibeck V. Fokusgrupper: om fokuserade gruppintervjuer som undersökningsmetod. 2nd ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2011.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mygind A, Kristiansen M, Wittrup I, Nørgaard LS. Patient perspectives on type 2 diabetes and medicine use during Ramadan among Pakistanis in Denmark. Int J Clin Pharm. 2013;35(2):281–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bradshaw M, Tomany-Korman S, Flores G. Language barriers to prescriptions for patients with limited English proficiency: a survey of pharmacies. Pediatrics. 2007;120(2):e225–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Halcomb EJ, Gholizadeh L, DiGiacomo M, Phillips J, Davidson PM. Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(6):1000–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij ter bevordering der Pharmacie 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helle Håkonsen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Karine Lees
    • 1
  • Else-Lydia Toverud
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social Pharmacy, School of PharmacyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations