Starting an automated dose dispensing service provided by community pharmacies in Finland
- 411 Downloads
Background In an automated dose dispensing (ADD) service, medicines are packed in unit-dose bags according to administration times. When the service is initiated, the patient’s medication list is reconciled and the medication is reviewed on the basis of this list. Objective The aim of this national study was to investigate how the medication list was reconciled, what type of medication review was conducted, and what changes were made to the patient’s medications when the ADD service is initiated. Setting Primary care in Finland. Method All patients enrolled in the service during a 3-week period in autumn 2010 were included in the study. All community pharmacies (n = 267) purchasing unit-dose bags from Espoonlahti Pharmacy documented the actions taken in the ADD initiation process using a structured data collection sheet. Main outcome measure Information sources needed in medication reconciliation, the type of medication review conducted and changes made to patients’ medications. Results Documentation was completed for 147 out of 325 new ADD users resulting 45 % as a response rate. More than one source was needed for 63 % of the patients in medication reconciliation. The most common sources used were nursing staff (72 % of the patients) and an existing medication list (71 %). Some type of medication review, most commonly a prescription review, was conducted for the majority of the patients (96 %), usually in multi-professional collaboration. Treatment-related changes were made for 43 % of the patients and technical changes were made for 93 % of the patients. Conclusion The medication list was incomplete for more than half of the patients. Some type of medication review was conducted for most of the patients. Both treatment-related changes and technical changes were made on patients’ medications during the initiation process. The start-up process of the ADD service needs further development to ensure a standard procedure and optimum use of resources.
KeywordsAutomated dose dispensing Community pharmacy Finland Homedwelling elderly Medication review Medication safety
The study was funded by grants from the Association of Finnish Pharmacies and the University Pharmacy.
Conflicts of interest
Juha Sinnemäki is a former employee of the Association of Finnish Pharmacies. Currently, he works at the University Pharmacy. Leena K. Saastamoinen works as a Senior Researcher at the Social Insurance Institution. The Institution reimburses the automated dose dispensing service fee for aged outpatients, according to explicit criteria. Sirpa Peura works as a Director of Pharmaceutical Affairs at the Association of Finnish Pharmacies. Marja Airaksinen is a Board Member of the University Pharmacy.
- 1.Classification for Drug related problems [Internet]. Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe Foundation; c2003-2010 [cited 12 Mar 2013]. http://www.pcne.org/sig/drp/documents/PCNE%20classification%20V6-2.pdf.
- 8.Annual Review 2003: Medicines in pre-packed doses [Internet]. The Association of Finnish Pharmacies, c2003 [cited 11 Mar 2013]. http://www.apteekkariliitto.fi/media/pdf/annual_report_2003.pdf.
- 9.Dose dispensing [Internet]. Danish Health and Medicines Authority, c2012 [cited 11 Mar 2013]. http://laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/en/topics/retail-and-online-sale/pharmacies/dose-dispensing.
- 10.Gombos A: [Automated dose dispensing is a good system]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2004;124:1144. Norwegian.Google Scholar
- 11.Annual report 2009 [Internet]. Apoteket AB, c2009 [cited 11 Mar 2013]. http://www.apoteket.se/privatpersoner/om/Documents/Finansiell%20information/Apoteket_2010_ENG_web%20(2).pdf.
- 12.The Medicines Act of Finland [Internet] [cited 12 Mar 2013]. http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1987/19870395?search%5Btype%5D=pika&search%5Bpika%5D=lääkelaki.Google Scholar
- 13.The Health Insurance Act of Finland [Internet] [cited 12 Mar 2013]. http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2004/20041224?search%5Btype%5D=pika&search%5Bpika%5D=sairausvakuutuslaki.
- 16.Sjöberg C, Edward C, Fastbom J, Johnell K, Landahl S, Narbro K, et al. Association between multi-dose drug dispensing and quality of drug treatment—A register-based study. PlosOne [Internet]. 2011 Oct [cited 12 Mar 2013];6(10):e26574. http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026574&representation=PDF.
- 20.Wekre LJ, Spigset O, Sletvold O, Sund JK, Grimsmo A. multidose drug dispensing and discrepancies between medication records. Qual Saf Health Care [Internet]. 2010 Aug [cited 12 Mar 2013];19(5):1–4. http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/19/5/e42.long.
- 23.Health services [Internet]. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; c2013 [cited 12 Mar 2013]. http://www.stm.fi/en/social_and_health_services/health_services.
- 24.Lindsröm G. Changes made to patients’ medications and reasons for them when patients are enrolled in an automated dose dispensing service [thesis]. Finland: Palmenia centre for continuing education, University of Helsinki, Helsinki; 2010.Google Scholar
- 25.Medicines Policy 2020 [Internet]. The Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, c2011 [cited 2013 Mar 12]. http://www.stm.fi/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=2765155&name=DLFE-15667.pdf.
- 27.WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2013. Oslo; 2012.Google Scholar
- 30.Tanskanen P, Jäkälä J, Airaksinen M, Enlund H. Physicians’ views on co-operation with community pharmacist in Finland. J Soc Adm Pharm. 1997;14:220–9.Google Scholar