Adherence to medication for chronic disorders during pregnancy: results from a multinational study
- 906 Downloads
Background For a variety of chronic disorders, low medication adherence during pregnancy may jeopardize maternal as well as foetal health. Little is known about how closely pregnant women follow their chronic pharmacotherapy regimens. Objective To explore the level of adherence to medication for a variety of chronic disorders, namely cardiovascular, rheumatic and bowel disorders, diabetes and epilepsy, during pregnancy and to identify determinants of low adherence during pregnancy. Setting This multinational, cross-sectional, internet-based study was undertaken in 18 countries in Europe, North America and Australia. Data originating from some South American countries were also collected. Methods The study period lasted from 1-October-2011 to 29-February-2012. By using an anonymous on-line questionnaire we collected information about maternal demographics, chronic disorders and related medication use during pregnancy, and women’s pregnancy-specific beliefs about medication. Main outcome measure Adherence to medication during pregnancy via the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). Results A total of 210 pregnant women reported chronic medication use during pregnancy and filled in the MMAS-8. Overall, 36.2 % had low medication adherence. On the basis of the MMAS-8, the rates of low adherence were 55.6 % for medication for rheumatic disorders, 40.0 % for epilepsy, 36.1 % for bowel disorders, 32.9 % for cardiovascular disorders, and 17.1 % for diabetes. A lack of folic acid use, having previous children, and individual pregnancy-specific beliefs about medication were significant determinants of low medication adherence during pregnancy. Conclusion Many pregnant women had low adherence to their chronic pharmacotherapy regimens during pregnancy. Women’s beliefs about medication were a central factor determining low adherence.
KeywordsAdherence International study Medication Pregnancy
We thank the Scientific Board of OTIS and ENTIS, the website providers who contributed to the recruitment phase, the national coordinators of the study (Twigg MJ, Zagorodnikova K, Mårdby AC, Moretti ME, Drozd M, Panchaud A, Hameen-Anttila K, Rieutord A, Gjergja Juraski R, Odalovic M, Kennedy D, Rudolf G, Juch H, Passier JLM and Björnsdóttir I) and all participating women. We also thank Professor Donald E. Morisky for letting us use the MMAS-8.
The study has received financial support from the Norwegian Research Council (Grant no. 216771/F11) and the Foundation for Promotion of Norwegian Pharmacies and the Norwegian Pharmaceutical Society.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
- 2.Ross DS. Hypothyroidism during pregnancy: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment. In: Basow DS, editor. Up to date. Waltham, MA: Up To Date; 2013.Google Scholar
- 5.ACOG practice bulletin. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. ACOG Committee on practice bulletins. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(1):suppl 177–185.Google Scholar
- 6.Sabaté E. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action: World Health Organization; 2003.Google Scholar
- 7.Matsui D. Adherence with drug therapy in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012; 2012:Article ID 796590, 5 pages.Google Scholar
- 11.WHO Collaborating Centre for Drugs Statistics Methodology. ATC/ddd index 2012. [cited 2012 17 March]; Available from: http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/.
- 12.Briggs GG, Freeman RK, Yaffe SJ. Drugs in pregnancy and lactation. [S.l.]: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.Google Scholar
- 14.Donald Morisky’s website. Morisky medication adherence scale. 2011 [cited 2013 23 May]; Available from: http://dmorisky.bol.ucla.edu/MMA_scale.html.
- 15.Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1977;39(1):1–38.Google Scholar
- 23.Schachter SC. Management of epilepsy and pregnancy. In: Basow DS, editor. Up to date. Waltham, MA: Up To Date; 2013.Google Scholar
- 31.Seybert H. Internet use in households and by individuals in 2011. Eurostat statistics in focus 2011.Google Scholar
- 32.Internet World Stats. Usage and population statistics. 2012 [cited 2012 13 November]; Available from: http://www.internetworldstats.com/.
- 33.Australian Bureau of Statistics. Household use of information technology, Australia, 2010-11 [cited 2012 13 November]; Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/8146.0Main%20Features12010-11?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=8146.0&issue=2010-11&num=&view=.
- 34.Statistics Canada. Individual internet use and e-commerce. 2010 [cited 2012 13 November]; Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/111012/dq111012a-eng.htm.
- 35.United States Census Bureau. The 2012 statistical abstract. Information & communications: Internet publishing and broadcasting and internet usage. 2010 [cited 2012 13 November]; Available from: http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/information_communications/internet_publishing_and_broadcasting_and_internet_usage.html.