Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 236–243 | Cite as

Community pharmacists in Khartoum State, Sudan: their current roles and perspectives on pharmaceutical care implementation

  • Alnada Ibrahim
  • Jenny Scott
Research Article

Abstract

Background The contribution of community pharmacists to the provision of primary healthcare is widely believed to be important. The health authority in Sudan is interested in developing pharmaceutical care (PC) practice as a means of improving the provision of primary healthcare services. However, there is a need for research to inform this development. Objectives To describe the current roles of community pharmacists; to describe their views about their current role and potential future role with regard to PC practice. Settings Community pharmacies in Khartoum State, Sudan. Methods This study applied a two-phase mixed methods approach. The first phase used a pre-tested, piloted, self-administered questionnaire with a stratified random sample of 246 pharmacies (26 % of total number) in Khartoum State. The sample size was based on 95 % confidence level, 5 % confidence interval and the response rate from the pilot study. The second phase applied semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 24 of the responded pharmacists. Main outcome measure Current activities of community pharmacists; pharmacists’ opinions on PC practice and the barriers they might face in its implementation. Results For the questionnaire study the response rate was 83 % (205/246). Most dispensing activities were reported to be performed by a vast majority of respondents (94 % or more). A few PC activities were reported to be already performed by the majority of participants e.g. checking indications, interactions and contraindication (83 %, n = 171) and checking each repeat prescription for compliance (78 %, n = 159). However, the majority of PC activities were not performed. Nearly all pharmacist (99 %, n = 203) were willing to further implement PC practice, but reported a number of barriers to its implementation. Conclusion Efficient dispensing of prescriptions is the primary focus of community pharmacists in Khartoum State with some PC activities. The pharmacists have expressed a willingness to implement PC practice but indicated a number of barriers to successful implementation.

Keywords

Community pharmacists Current roles Implementation Pharmaceutical care Sudan 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the pharmacists who voluntarily participated in this study.

Funding

This study was funded by the University of Khartoum, Sudan.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in connection with this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organisation. Developing pharmacy practice: A focus on patient care. Geneva: WHO; 2006.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hepler CD, Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990;47(3):533–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Small SD, Servi D, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events—implications for prevention. JAMA. 1995;274(1):29–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Avorn J, McCormick D, Jain S, Eckler M, et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in nursing homes. Am J Med. 2000;109(2):87–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hammond RW, Schwartz AH, Campbell MJ, Remington TL, Chuck S, Blair MM, et al. Collaborative drug therapy management by pharmacists–2003. Pharmacotherapy. 2003;23(9):1210–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Richardson E, Pollock AM. Community pharmacy: moving from dispensing to diagnosis and treatment. BMJ [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2012 March 25]; 340. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20460333.
  7. 7.
    van Mil JWF. Pharmaceutical care in community pharmacy: practice and research in the Netherlands. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39(10):1720–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Mil J, de Boer W, Tromp T. European barriers to the implementation of pharmaceutical care. Int J Pharm Pract. 2001;9(3):163–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Uema SA, Vega EM, Armando PD, Fontana D. Barriers to pharmaceutical care in Argentina. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30(3):211–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ngorsuraches S, Li SC. Thai pharmacists’ understanding, attitudes, and perceived barriers related to providing pharmaceutical care. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006;63(21):2144–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aburuz S, Al-Ghazawi M, Snyder A. Pharmaceutical care in a community-based practice setting in Jordan: where are we now with our attitudes and perceived barriers? Int J Pharm Pract. 2012;20(2):71–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Federal Ministry of Health, Sudan, Annual Pharmaceutical Statistical Report, 2006. [cited 2011 November 23]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s17176ar/s17176ar.pdf, FMOH Khartoum.
  13. 13.
    Federal Ministry of Health, Sudan, Annual Pharmaceutical Statistical Report, 2006. Available from: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s17176ar/s17176ar.pdf, FMOH Khartoum.
  14. 14.
    Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL., Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2007.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cordina M, McElnay JC, Hughes CM. The importance that community pharmacists in Malta place on the introduction of pharmaceutical care. Pharm World Sci. 1999;21(2):69–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dunlop JA, Shaw JP. Community pharmacists’ perspectives on pharmaceutical care implementation in New Zealand. Pharm World Sci. 2002;24(6):224–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Erah PO, Nwazuoke JC. Identification of Standards for Pharmaceutical Care in Benin City. Trop J Pharm Res [Internet]. 2002 Dec [cited 2012 Feb 14]; 1(2). Available from: http://www.ajol.info/index.php/tjpr/article/viewFile/14585/16157.
  18. 18.
    Rossing C, Hansen EH, Traulsen JM, Krass I. Actual and perceived provision of pharmaceutical care in Danish community pharmacies: the pharmacists’ opinions. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27(3):175–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Awad AI, Eltayeb IB. Self-medication practices with antibiotics and antimalarials among sudanese undergraduate university students. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41(7):1249–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Abdalla SI, Malik EM, and Ali KM. The burden of malaria in Sudan: incidence, mortality and disability - adjusted life—years. Malaria J [Internet]. 2007 April [cited 2011 Nov 23]; 6(97). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1995207/pdf/1475-2875-6-97.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pharmacy and PharmacologyUniversity of BathBathUK
  2. 2.Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Pharmacy Practice GroupUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations