International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 138–144 | Cite as

Preventive counselling for public health in pharmacies in South Germany

  • Karin SchmiedelEmail author
  • Helmut Schlager
  • Frank Dörje
Research Article


Background No overview of preventive health activities conducted by pharmacists in South Germany has been available until now. Moreover, little about the needs of the public is known with regard to pharmacy-based preventive services. Objectives To gain an overview of the preventive health services and campaigns carried out by pharmacists in the federal state of Bavaria, and to assess the interest of the public for pharmacy-based preventive care counselling. Setting Pharmacies in the seven Bavarian administrative districts, South Germany. Methods In September 2010, all 3,470 pharmacies in Bavaria were mailed a questionnaire concerning their preventive health activities. The pharmacists were given the opportunity to complete the questionnaire either online or to mail them in. To assess the needs of pharmacy-based preventive health services in the Bavarian population, customers of 50 pharmacies were invited to fill in an anonymous self-completion questionnaire in March 2011. Main outcome measure Relevant preventive health services which can be provided by pharmacists in order to meet the customers’ needs. Results 519 of 3,470 pharmacies (15.0 %) took part in the survey. 60.5 % (n = 314) conducted at least one preventive health activity in the past and 51.6 % (n = 268) offering a disease prevention education event at least once a year. As a result of the pharmacists’ survey, a ranking list of the most frequent preventive care activities was established. The projects conducted often lacked structured project schedules and evaluations. The survey assessing customer needs was completed by 1,808 customers in 49 of 50 community pharmacies. Pharmacists were identified as the preferred provider in 29 of the 31 preventive care services listed in the questionnaire. A ranking list with the top ten preventive subjects of highest interest was compiled. Conclusions Pharmacists are active in many different prevention subjects and there is a great interest in pharmacy-based preventive care counselling in the Bavarian population. Very few structured, well planned and evaluated preventive projects have been conducted in Bavarian community pharmacies. Further surveys are needed to analyse the benefit of pharmacy-based preventive care counselling for the Bavarian population.


Community pharmacies Germany Health promotion Health services needs Pharmacy Prevention Preventive health services 



The authors acknowledge the support of Luc Besançon, International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP), during our research and for reviewing the draft of this article. The authors would like to thank the staff of WIPIG and Dr. Mirjam Gnadt, Drug Information Centre, Pharmacy Department, Erlangen University Hospital, for assistance during the literature research, for reviewing the questionnaires and the draft of this article. Moreover, the authors thank the 50 pharmacies for collecting the questionnaires from their customers.


This study received funding through the Bavarian Health Promotion Initiative ‘Gesund.Leben.Bayern.’ by the Bavarian State Ministry of Environment and Health.

Conflicts of interest

No conflict of interest to declare.


  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Report. November 21, 1986. Accessed 28 Nov 2011.
  2. 2.
    Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bundesministerium der Justiz. Fünftes Buch Sozialgesetzbuch. July 28, 2011. Accessed 28 Nov 2011.
  3. 3.
    GKV-Spitzenverband. Leitfaden Prävention. August 27, 2010. Accessed 28 Nov 2011.
  4. 4.
    Bayerische Landesapothekerkammer. Berufsordnung für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker. July 1, 2006. Accessed 28 Nov 2011.
  5. 5.
    Community pharmacy Scotland. NHS Care Services. Public Health Service. Accessed 4 Jan 2012.
  6. 6.
    Hersberger KE, Botomino A, Mancini M, Bruppacher R. Sequential screening for diabetes—evaluation of a campaign in Swiss community pharmacies. Pharm World Sci. 2006;28(3):171–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bearden DT, Holt T. Statewide impact of pharmacist-delivered adult influenza vaccinations. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29(5):450–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    World Health Organization. Life expectancy at birth. World Health Statistics 2011. Accessed 28 Nov 2011.
  9. 9.
    World Health Organization. Action plan for the implementation of the European Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2012–2016. September, 2011. Accessed 27 Nov 2011.
  10. 10.
    World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. April, 2011. Accessed 18 Jan 2011.
  11. 11.
    United Nations. Draft Political Declaration of the High-Level Meeting on the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases. 2011. Accessed 18 Jan 2011.
  12. 12.
    Choo L, Norton J. Bowel cancer screening. Aust Pharm. 2008;29(8):655–8. Accessed 18 Jan 2012.
  13. 13.
    World Health Organization. NCD Country Profiles, Germany. 2011. Accessed 13 Jan 2012.
  14. 14.
    Böhmer MM, Walter D, Krause G, Müters S, Gösswald A, Wichmann O. Determinants of tetanus and seasonal influenza vaccine uptake in adults living in Germany. Hum Vaccin. 2011;7(12):1317–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Köster I, Huppertz E, Hauner H, Schubert I. Direct costs of diabetes mellitus in Germany—CoDiM 2000–2007. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2011;119(6):377–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Apothekerverbände. Zahlen Daten Fakten 2011. Apothekendichte im europäischen Vergleich. Accessed 23 July 2012.
  17. 17.
    Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Apothekerverbände. Zahlen Daten Fakten 2011. Image der Apotheke. Accessed 23 July 2012.
  18. 18.
    Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Apothekerverbände. Zahlen Daten Fakten 2011. Leistungen der Apotheken. Accessed 23 July 2012.
  19. 19.
    Fuchs J. Impfberatung in der Apotheke—ein Beispiel. Deutsche Apotheker Zeitung. 2005;145(11):57–60.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fuchs J. Die große Impfberatung in Thüringens Apotheken. Pharmazeutische Zeitung. 2008;153(35):58–63.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Botomino A, Bruppacher R, Krähenbühl S, Hersberger KE. Change of body weight and lifestyle of persons at risk for diabetes after screening and counselling in pharmacies. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30(3):222–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Robert Koch-Institut. Beiträge zur Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Daten und Fakten. Ergebnisse der Studie Gesundheit in Deutschland aktuell 2009. 2011. Accessed 28 Nov 2011.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karin Schmiedel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Helmut Schlager
    • 1
  • Frank Dörje
    • 2
  1. 1.Wissenschaftliches Institut für Prävention im Gesundheitswesen (WIPIG), Bayerische LandesapothekerkammerScientific Institute for Prevention in Health CareMunichGermany
  2. 2.Pharmacy DepartmentErlangen University HospitalErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations