Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 72–78 | Cite as

What do hospital staff in the UK think are the causes of penicillin medication errors?

  • Michael WilcockEmail author
  • Geoff Harding
  • Lorraine Moore
  • Ian Nicholls
  • Neil Powell
  • Jon Stratton
Research Article

Abstract

Background Medication errors are a potential major threat to patient’s health, and allergic reactions occurring in patients with known allergies are an important preventable form of adverse drug event. The use of penicillin antibiotics in patients who are allergic to penicillin, in particular, is a major concern. Aim To survey staff attitudes and beliefs to incidents involving penicillin allergic patients who are prescribed and administered penicillin antibiotics. Setting A 650 bed teaching hospital in England. Method Using individual and (focus) group interview proceedings with a purposive sample of doctors, nurses and pharmacists, an electronic questionnaire was administered hospital wide to all clinical staff. No reminders were issued. Main outcome measures: Clinical staff’s views on the causes of penicillin medication errors. Results The electronic survey was completed by 235 members of the clinical staff. Half the respondents definitely considered themselves knowledgeable about which antibiotics contain penicillin medicines, though approximately 90 % of respondents considered that misinformation or lack of knowledge on which antibiotics contain penicillin medicines was an issue for some or most colleagues. Various organisational issues such as the use of red wrist bands, the wearing of red tabards by the nurse during the medicines round, and a busy work environment were recurrently highlighted as systems factors that could be improved upon. Conclusion Our study elucidated concerns amongst clinical staff relating to the scenario of a penicillin allergic patient receiving a penicillin antibiotic. The resulting local learning and feedback about staff beliefs pertaining to this one specific type of error will be used to consider the nature and type of local action to be taken to help improve patient safety.

Keywords

Allergy Education England Hospital Medicines administration Penicillin Pharmacist 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank those hospital staff who participated in the various aspects of this study.

Funding

Pfizer, through an educational grant, helped facilitate some aspects of the qualitative work described.

Conflicts of interest

No conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Cousins DH, Gerrett D, Warner B. A review of medication incidents reported to the National Reporting and Learning System in England and Wales over six years (2005–2010). Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;74(4):597–604.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barber ND, Dean BS. The incidence of medication errors and ways to reduce them. Clin Risk. 1998;4:103–6.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reason J. Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990. ISBN: 0521314194.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reason JT. Managing the risks of organisational accidents. Aldershot: Ashgate; 1997. ISBN: 1840141050.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahajan RP. Medication errors: can we prevent them? Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(1):3–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nichols P, Copeland T-S, Craib IA, Hopkins P, Bruce DG. Learning from error: identifying contributory causes of medication errors in an Australian hospital. Med J Aust. 2008;188(5):276–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dean B, Schachter M, Vincent C, Barber N. Causes of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a prospective study. Lancet. 2002;359:1373–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Beuzekom M, Boer F, Akerboom S, Hudson P. Patient safety: latent risk factors. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(1):52–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leistikow IP, Kalkman CJ, de Bruijn H. Why patient safety is such a tough nut to crack. BMJ. 2011;342:d3447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Safety in Doses: medication safety incidents in the NHS. Fourth report from the patient safety observatory, National Patient Safety Agency; 2007. ISBN: 0955634024.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Solensky R. Hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotic. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2003;24:201–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borch JE, Andersen KE, Bindslev-Jensen C. The prevalence of suspected and challenge verified penicillin allergy in a university hospital population. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;98:357–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman and Burgess, editor. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994, p. 173–94. ISBN: 041506063X.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moore L, Nicholls I, Powell N, Wilcock M. Hospital staff knowledge of use of antibiotics in penicillin allergy—is there room for improvement? Pharm J. 2012;288:49.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vincent C, Taylor-Adams S, Stanhope N. Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. BMJ. 1998;316:1154–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Klein JG. Five pitfalls in decisions about diagnosis and prescribing. BMJ. 2005;330:781–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dornan T, Ashcroft D, Heathfield H, Lewis P, Miles J, Taylor D, Tully M, Wass V. An in‐depth investigation into causes of prescribing errors by foundation trainees in relation to their medical education: EQUIP study. Final report to the General Medical Council. University of Manchester: School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences and School of Medicine. 2009 Available from: http://www.pharmacy.manchester.ac.uk/cip/CIPPublications/commissionedreports/prescribing_errors_prevalence_incidence.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2012.
  18. 18.
    Reason J, Hobbs, A. Managing maintenance error: a practical guide. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company; 2003. ISBN: 075461591X.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ismail ZF, Ismail TF, Wilson AJ. Improving safety for patients with allergies: an intervention for improving allergy documentation. Clin Gov Int J. 2008;13(2):86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Calkin S. Tabards reworded after outcry. Nursing Times. 2011;107(35):5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scott J, Ingram J, Mackenzie F. The effectiveness of drug round tabards in reducing incidence of medication errors. Nursing Times. 2010;106(34):13–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Taylor AI, Orton J, Nickless G. Investigating the opinions and perceptions of nurses and other healthcare professionals on the red tabard system. Clin Pharm. 2011;3:S40–1.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Department of Health. Expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS. An organisation with a memory. London: Department of Health; 2000. ISBN: 0113224419.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hesselgreaves H, Watson A, Crawford A, Lough M, Bowie P. Medication safety: using incident data analysis and clinical focus groups to inform educational needs. J Eval Clin Pract. Online early view. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01763.x.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Wilcock
    • 1
    Email author
  • Geoff Harding
    • 2
  • Lorraine Moore
    • 1
  • Ian Nicholls
    • 1
  • Neil Powell
    • 1
  • Jon Stratton
    • 3
  1. 1.Pharmacy DepartmentRoyal Cornwall Hospitals NHS TrustTruroUK
  2. 2.Primary CarePeninsula College of Medicine and DentistryExeterUK
  3. 3.Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS TrustTruroUK

Personalised recommendations