Clinical pharmacist’s contribution to medication reconciliation on admission to hospital in Ireland
- 1.4k Downloads
Background Medication reconciliation has been mandated by the Irish government at transfer of care. Research is needed to determine the contribution of clinical pharmacists to the process. Objective To describe the contribution of emergency department based clinical pharmacists to admission medication reconciliation in Ireland. Main Outcome Measure Frequency of clinical pharmacist’s activities. Setting Two public university teaching hospitals. Methodology Adults admitted via the accident and emergency department, from a non-acute setting, reporting the use of at least three regular prescription medications, were eligible for inclusion. Medication reconciliation was provided by clinical pharmacists to randomly-selected patients within 24-hours of admission. This process includes collecting a gold-standard pre-admission medication list, checking this against the admission prescription and communicating any changes. A discrepancy was defined as any difference between the gold-standard pre-admission medication list and the admission prescription. Discrepancies were communicated to the clinician in the patient’s healthcare record. Potentially harmful discrepancies were also communicated verbally. Pharmacist activities and unintentional discrepancies, both resolved and unresolved at 48-hours were measured. Unresolved discrepancies were confirmed verbally by the team as intentional or unintentional. A reliable and validated tool was used to assess clinical significance by medical consultants, clinical pharmacists, community pharmacists and general practitioners. Results In total, 134 patients, involving 1,556 medications, were included in the survey. Over 97 % of patients (involving 59 % of medications) experienced a medication change on admission. Over 90 % of patients (involving 29 % of medications) warranted clinical pharmacy input to determine whether such changes were intentional or unintentional. There were 447 interventions by the clinical pharmacist regarding apparently unintentional discrepancies, a mean of 3.3 per patient. In total, 227 (50 %) interventions were accepted and discrepancies resolved. At 48-hours under half (46 %) of patients remained affected by an unintentional unresolved discrepancy (60 % related to omissions). Verbally communicated discrepancies were more likely to be resolved than those not communicated verbally (Chi-square (1) = 30.029 p < 0.05). Under half of unintentional unresolved discrepancies (46 %) had the potential to cause minor harm compared to 70 % of the resolved unintentional discrepancies. None had the potential to result in severe harm. Conclusion Clinical pharmacists contribute positively to admission medication reconciliation and should be engaged to deliver this service in Ireland.
KeywordsClinical pharmacy Hospital pharmacy Ireland Medication reconciliation Medication safety Patient safety Patient admission
The work of all the healthcare professionals who undertook the clinical significance testing is greatly appreciated.
- 4.Rees S, Thomas P, Shetty A, Makinde K. Drug history errors in the acute medical assessment unit quantified by use of the NPSA classification. Pharm J. 2007;279:469–71.Google Scholar
- 9.Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Accuracy at every step: the challenge of medication reconciliation. Cambridge: Institute of Healthcare Improvement; 2006.Google Scholar
- 10.Madden D. Building a culture of patient safety. Report of the commission on patient safety and quality assurance (IE). Department of Health, Ireland; 2008.Google Scholar
- 11.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence/National Patient Safety Agency. Technical patient safety solutions for medicines reconciliation on admission of adults to hospitals. PSG001; 2007.Google Scholar
- 12.National Prescribing Centre (UK). Medicines reconciliation: a guide to implementation. Good practice guide, 5 min guides; 2008.Google Scholar
- 13.Campbell F, Karnon J, Czoski C, Jones R. A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions aimed at preventing medication errors (medicines reconciliation) at hospital admission. The University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research. (ScHARR); 2007.Google Scholar
- 21.Royal College of Physicians of Ireland/Irish Association of Directors of Nursing and Midwifery/Therapy Professions Committee/Quality and Clinical Care Directorate, Health Service Executive. Report of the National Acute Medicine Programme 2010 (internet) accessed 5th October 2011 http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/Publications/services/Hospitals/AMP.pdf.
- 23.Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2002.Google Scholar