Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 728–732 | Cite as

The influence of consumers’ preferences and perceptions of oral solid dosage forms on their treatment

  • Inas Rifaat IbrahimEmail author
  • Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim
  • Mahmoud Sa’di Al-Haddad
Research Article

Abstract

Background Beyond the direct pharmacological effect of medicines, preferences and perceptions toward a particular oral solid dosage form (OSDF) play a crucial role in recovery and may reduce adherence to the prescribed treatment. Objectives This study conducted to investigate the most preferred OSDF and the degree to which swallowing solid medication is an issue, to assess perceptions of the therapeutic benefits of the OSDF, and to find predictors of the most preferred OSDF. Method A cross-sectional study, through convenience sample method, was conducted to survey consumers visiting community pharmacies in Baghdad, Iraq. Data was collected by selfadministered and pre-piloted questionnaires, and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science. Multiple logistic regression analysis and Chi-square tests were used at alpha level = 0.05. Results A total of 1,000 questionnaire were included in the analysis. Of all respondents, 52.9 % preferred capsule among other OSDF and this preference varied significantly with a number of socio-demographic factors. Ease of swallowing solid medication was the main issue which resulted in preferences for a particular form. A negative perception of the therapeutic benefits of the OSDF was found among 89.1 % of the consumers. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that gender, ease of swallowing, and perceptions of the therapeutic benefits of the OSDF were significant predictors of capsule preferences. Conclusions Given the fact that consumers are the end users of medicines and their preferences may influence response to the treatment, efforts are worthwhile by the prescribers and medicines’ manufactures to understand consumers’ preferences of a particular dosage form in order to achieve successful therapy outcomes.

Keywords

Capsule Perceptions Preferences Swallowing Tablet 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the pharmacists who allowed the researchers to interview consumers at their own pharmacies in Baghdad. Further, we would like to thank all the participants for their time to complete the questionnaires.

Funding

None

Conflicts of interest

The authors of this study have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Buckalew L, Sallis R. Patient compliance and medication perception. J Clin Psychol. 1986;42:49–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buckalew L, Ross S. Medication property effects on expectations of action. Drug Dev Res. 1991;23:101–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reisenwitz T, Wimbish G. Over the counter pharmaceuticals: exploratory research of consumers preferences toward solid oral dosage forms. Health Mark Q. 1996;13:47–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Al-Shammari A, Khoja T, Al-Yamani J. Compliance with short-term antibiotic therapy among patients attending primary health centres in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J R Soc Health. 1995;115:231–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hey H, Jorgenson F, Sorensen K, Wamberg T. Oesophageal transit of six commonly used tablet and capsules. Br Med J. 1982;285:1717–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brotherman D, Bayraktaroglu T, Garofalo R. Comparison of ease of swallowing of dietary supplements products for age- related eye diseases. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2004;44:587–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones W, Francis J. Soft gels: consumers perceptions and market impact relative to other oral dosage forms. Adv Ther. 2000;17:213–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brieger W, Salami K, Pshiname F. Perception of drug color among drug sellers and consumers in rural south western Nigeria. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2007;3:303–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhosle M, Benner J, DeKoven M, Shelton J. Difficult to swallow: patient preferences for alternative valproate pharmaceutical formulations. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009;3:161–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carnaby-Mann G, Crary M. Pill swallowing by adults with dysphagia. Arch Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg. 1970;131:970–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Overgaard A, Hojsted J, Hansen R. Moller- Sonnergaard J, Christrup L. Patients’ evaluation of shape, size, and color of solid dosage forms. Pharm World Sci. 2001;23:185–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Daher A, Amin F. Assessing the perceptions of a biostatistics and epidemiology module: view of year 2 medical students from a Malaysian university. A cross-sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buckalew L, Coffield K. An investigation of drug expectancy as a function of capsule color and size and preparation form. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1982;2:245–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inas Rifaat Ibrahim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim
    • 2
  • Mahmoud Sa’di Al-Haddad
    • 3
  1. 1.Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia
  2. 2.Research and Graduate Studies Affairs, College of PharmacyQatar UniversityDohaQatar
  3. 3.College of PharmacyTaif UniversityTaifKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations