Exploring patients’ motivation to participate in Australia’s Home Medicines Review program
- 358 Downloads
Background Patients at risk of experiencing medicine-related problems do not always appear willing to participate in collaborative medication management services. Little is known about the psycho-social factors which motivate patients to participate in these services. The theory of motivated information management (TMIM) suggests that patients’ willingness to participate may be motivated by their uncertainty and worry about their medicines. Objective The objective of this study was to investigate factors which may motivate patients to participate in a collaborative medication management program. Setting Fourteen semi-structured focus group interviews held throughout Australia provided the data for the study. Eighty participants were recruited by community pharmacists. Participants were recruited into the study if they had experienced Australia’s Home Medicines Review (HMR) program or would be eligible to participate in the program because they were at risk of experiencing medicine-related problems. Methods An interview guide was developed which was informed by TMIM. Focus group data were audio-recorded, transcribed and where necessary, translated into English. Main outcome measure Qualitative data were thematically analysed to identify participants’ expectations about the outcomes of HMR and the factors which may influence these expectations. Results Participants’ most salient outcome expectancies of HMR were that it was a medication-information source which would assist them to manage their medicines. Recipients of the program held overall positive outcome expectancies, whereas nonrecipients’ expectancies varied widely. Consistent with theory, participants who expressed some worry about their medicines, generally held positive outcome expectancies and were willing to participate in HMR. Compared with younger participants, older participants (those aged >74 years) tended to engage less in their thoughts about being at risk, and consequently did not experience worry. Conclusion Worry about medicines is a key factor in motivating participants to engage in medicines information-seeking. Older persons who rely heavily on heuristics appeared less likely to worry about their medicines and willing to participate in medication management services. Age-related reduction in the motivation to participate may have important implications for medication safety. Further examination of this effect is warranted because older persons are at greatest risk of medicine related problems.
KeywordsAustralia Heuristics Home Medication Review Medication Review Medicine information Medicine-related problems Motivation Uncertainty
We would like to thank all participants for their time and contribution to this study, as well as the community pharmacists who assisted with recruitment. We are grateful to Christiane Klinner who coordinated the project, and to Simone Goppert who assisted with the preparation of the manuscript.
This project was funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, as part of the Fourth Community Pharmacy Agreement Research & Development Program managed by the Pharmacy Guild of Australia.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest in authorship of this article.
- 2.Junius-Walker U, Voigt I, Wrede J, Hummers-Pradier E, Lazic D, Dierks M-L. Health and treatment priorities in patients with multimorbidity: report on a workshop from the European General Practice Network meeting ‘Research on multimorbidity in general practice’. Eur J Gen Pract. 2010;16(1):51–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Australian Government Medicare. Home Medicines Reviews. 2011; Available from: Available online at: www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/provider/pbs/fifth-agreement/home-medicines-review.jsp. Accessed: 24th Jan 2011.
- 19.Chen T, Larkin CA. Consumer attitudes toward and experiences of domiciliary visits by community pharmacists. Aust Pharm. 2002;21(9):682–8.Google Scholar
- 21.Kyle G, Nissen L. A community nurse referral system for HMRs—can it work? Aust Pharm. 2006;25(4):326–32.Google Scholar
- 22.Carter S, Chen T, White L. Home Medicines Reviews: a quantitative study of the views of recipients and eligible non-recipients. Int J Pharm Pract. 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2011.00180.x.
- 24.Latif A, Pollock K, Boardman H. Why do patients accept or decline the invitation for a Medicines Use Review? Int J Pharm Pract. 2010;18:21.Google Scholar
- 26.Raynor DK, Blenkinsopp A, Knapp P, Grime J, Nicolson DJ, Pollock K, et al. A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research on the role and effectiveness of written information available to patients about individual medicines. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(5):1–160.Google Scholar
- 29.Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census of population and housing. 2006. Available online at: www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/d3310114.nsf/Home/census. Accessed: 26th March 2011.
- 33.Carey M. The group effect in focus groups: planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group research. In: Morse J, editor. Critical issues in qualitative research methods. London: Sage; 1994. p. 225–41.Google Scholar
- 35.Montgomery AT, Kälvemark Sporrong S, Manap N, Tully MP, Lindblad ÅK. Receiving a pharmaceutical care service compared to receiving standard pharmacy service in Sweden-How do patients differ with regard to perceptions of medicine use and the pharmacy encounter? Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2010;6(3):185–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar