Pharmacist proactive medication recommendations using electronic documentation in a UK general critical care unit
- 612 Downloads
Background Specific data on the actual clinical practice of United Kingdom pharmacists in Critical Care are limited. Within the general critical care units of Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, clinical pharmacists have the facility to electronically document, communicate and follow-up proactive recommendations using a Pharmacy Review Form via the Clinical Information System, MetaVision®. Objective The objective of the service evaluation was to describe the acceptance rate by medical staff of pharmacist proactive medication recommendations; including data on the types of recommendations and reasons thereof, for general intensive care patients of a UK teaching hospital trust. Setting Sheffield Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust with 20 intensive care beds located on two hospital sites admitting Level 3 and 2 mixed general medical, surgical, trauma, burns and haematology/ oncology patients. Method Retrospective analysis of pharmacist proactive recommendations recorded electronically from January 2009 to July 2011 in general intensive care unit patients. Main outcome 5,623 electronic medication recommendations were documented, providing an average of 2.2 proactive recommendations per patient admitted to intensive care from January 2009 to July 2011. 5,101 (90.7%) of the recommendations were accepted and acted upon by medical staff. Results The most common recommendations were Add Drug 1,862 (28.2%); Dose Review 1,707 (25.8%); Discontinue Drug 1,185 (17.9%); Alternative Drug 903 (13.7%); Alternative Route 770 (11.7%). The most common reasons for the proactive medication recommendations were related to changes in gastrointestinal absorption 951 (15.6%); compliance with medication guidelines 857 (14.1%); sedation/delirium/agitation management 764 (12.6%); dose adjustment for renal dysfunction or continuous renal replacement therapies 756 (12.4%); and medication reconciliation 612 (10.1%). The majority of medication recommendations involved drugs in Gastrointestinal, Central Nervous System, Cardiovascular, Infection, Nutrition and Blood classes (British National Formulary). Conclusion There was a high acceptance rate for proactive medication-related recommendations made by critical care pharmacists via the electronic review form. The majority of pharmacist recommendations were related to adding or refining currently prescribed medication. Ten percent of recommendations related to medication reconciliation of patients’ pre-admission medication.
KeywordsClinical pharmacist Critical care Drug therapy Medicines reconciliation United Kingdom
We are grateful to Dr Mike Heap for his continued support with the customisation of the pharmacy review form and ongoing report generation. We are indebted to the pharmacist and medical staff for their support and use of the form in their clinical practice.
No special funding obtained.
Conflicts of interest
The authors claim no conflicts of interest.
- 12.Churchwell MD, Mueller BA. The clinical application of CRRT—current status: drug dosing during continuous renal replacement therapy. In: Seminars in dialysis. Wiley Online Library; 2009. p. 185–188.Google Scholar
- 13.Technical patient safety solutions for medicines reconciliation on admission of adults to hospital: Guidance: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and National Patient Safety Agency, 2007. Available from the world-wide-web: www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/PSG001Guidance.pdf.
- 14.Dodds LJ. Unintended discrepancies between pre-admission and admission prescriptions identified by pharmacy-led medicines reconciliation: results of a collaborative service evaluation across East and SE England. Int J Phar Pract. 2010;18(Suppl 2):9–10.Google Scholar
- 15.Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Available from the world-wide-web. www.survivingsepsis.org/Bundles/Individual_Changes/Pages/improve_antibiotic_time.aspx.
- 17.Staples A, Dade J, Acomb C. Intravenous fluid therapy—what pharmacists need to monitor. Hospital Pharmacist. 2008;15:277.Google Scholar
- 18.Broyles JE, Brown RO, Vehe KL, Nolly RJ, Luther RW. Pharmacist interventions improve fluid balance in fluid-restricted patients requiring parenteral nutrition. Drug Intell Clin Phar. 1991;25:119–22.Google Scholar
- 19.Critical care syllabus: Foundation and excellence level: United Kingdom Clinical Pharmacy Association Critical Care Group, 2009. Available from the world-wide-web. www.ukcpa.org/docs/Critical%20Care%20Syllabus%202009.pdf.
- 25.Choo CL. Service evaluation of the use of a clinical information system to document and communicate pharmacist-initiated medication recommendations in general intensive care units of Sheffield Teaching Hospitals. MSc. Leeds: University of Leeds; 2009.Google Scholar