Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 599–602 | Cite as

Quality of drug information database research for clinical decision support

  • Dorie W. HoodyEmail author
  • Cynthia F. Beckett
  • Christopher Zielenski
  • Gina D. Moore
Commentary

Abstract

This commentary identifies studies that have compared commercially available DI databases, and discusses improvements in study methodology that might better guide clinicians in selecting resources for their practice setting. We also provide suggestions for future direction of research in this area with an eye towards clinical decision support systems (CDSS). The body of comparative research of commercially available DI databases is small, and provides little value to the average clinician when making purchasing decisions. Transparency of study methodology would allow readers to choose a database that best fits their practice needs. Future research must consider how DI resources are imbedded within CDSS, such that the alerts generated by the CDSS are consistent with the primary DI workhorse of the practice site. Cohesion between CDSS and DI resources needs to be a consideration in future DI resource comparative research.

Keywords

Clinical decision support systems Drug information Drug information databases Pharmacy 

Notes

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Galt KA, Rule AM, Houghton B, Young DO, Remington G. Personal digital assistant-based drug information sources: potential to improve medication safety. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005;93(2):229–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Revere D, Turner AM, Madhavan A, Rambo N, Bugni PF, Kimball A, et al. Understanding the information needs of public health practitioners: a literature review to inform design of an interactive digital knowledge management system. J Biomed Inform. 2007;40(4):410–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kupferberg N, Hartel LJ. Evaluation of five full-text drug databases by pharmacy students, faculty, and librarians: do the groups agree? J Med Libr Assoc. 2004;92(1):66–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clauson KA, Marsh WA, Polen HH, Seamon MJ, Ortiz BI. Clinical decision support tools: analysis of online drug information databases. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007;7:7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Polen HH, Zapantis A, Clauson KA, Jebrock J, Paris M. Ability of online drug databases to assist in clinical decision-making with infectious disease therapies. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8:153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sweidan M, Reeve JF, Brien JE, Jayasuriya P, Martin JH, Vernon GM. Quality of drug interaction alerts in prescribing and dispensing software. MJA. 2009;190:251–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mollon B, Chong J Jr, Holbrook AM, Sung M, Thabane L, Foster G. Features predicting the success of computerized decision support for prescribing: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009;9:11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorie W. Hoody
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cynthia F. Beckett
    • 1
  • Christopher Zielenski
    • 1
  • Gina D. Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PharmacyUniversity of ColoradoAuroraUSA

Personalised recommendations