International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 573–581 | Cite as

A multi-method evaluation of the Pharmacy First Minor Ailments scheme

  • Somying Pumtong
  • Helen F. Boardman
  • Claire W. Anderson
Research Article

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate whether the Pharmacy First Minor Ailments scheme achieved its objectives in terms of improving access to medicines and reducing doctor workload for minor ailments by enhancing the role of community pharmacists in the management of minor ailments. Setting Nottingham, the United Kingdom. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted, including semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, a patient survey, and an analysis of the Nottingham City Primary Care Trust data. Main outcome measures Stakeholders’ acceptability of the scheme and scheme users’ satisfaction with the scheme. Results Most health care professionals were positive about the implementation of the scheme, although they reported some problems, such as the restricted formulary. The majority of stakeholders perceived benefits of the scheme for both patients and health care professionals. The level of patient satisfaction with the scheme was high, particularly in terms of ease of access and convenience. The current structure of the scheme appears to be an acceptable way to run the scheme. Since its commencement the scheme has enabled the transfer of a substantial number of minor ailments consultations from general practices to community pharmacies. Conclusion It appears that the Nottingham City Primary Care Trust is successful using community pharmacies to improve access to medicines and provide a greater choice in primary care for patients with minor ailments. Thus, the Primary Care Trust should continue the scheme, although there are some important issues (e.g. the restricted formulary, the lack of privacy in some pharmacies) that need to be addressed to improve and develop the service further. The Nottingham City Primary Care Trust should build on this success to further utilise the pharmacy in their primary care service development.

Keywords

Access to medicine Community pharmacy Minor ailments 

References

  1. 1.
    Schfheutle E, Cantrill J, Nicolson M, Noyce P. Insights into the choice between self-medication and a doctor’s prescription: a study of hay fever sufffers. Int J Pharm Pract. 1996;4(3):156–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hassell K, Noyce PR. Community pharmacy as a primary health and self care resource: a framework for understanding pharmacy utilisation. Health Soc Care Community. 2000;8(1):40–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Evans D. Do increasing levels of income deprivation have an effect on the prescribing of OTC medication. Int J Pharm Pract. 2001;9(Suppl):R69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Department of Health. Self care—a real choice, self care support—a practical option [Internet] London: Department of Health; 2005 Jan [updated 2005 Jan 12; cited 2011 Jan 08]. Available from http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4101702.pdf.
  5. 5.
    Blenkinsopp A, Noyce PR. Minor illness management in primary care: a review of community pharmacy NHS scheme. Keele: Department of Medicines Management, University of Keele; 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The National Pharmaceutical Association. Implementing a community pharmacy minor ailment scheme. A practical toolkit for primary care organisations and health professionals [Internet] Herts: The National Pharmaceutical Association; 2003 Dec [updated 2003 Dec; cited 2011 Jan 08]. Available from http://www.npa.co.uk/Documents/Docstore/PCO_LPCs/implementing_a_community_pharmacy_minor_ailment_scheme.pdf.
  7. 7.
    NHS information Centre. General pharmaceutical services in England and Wales, 2000–01 to 2009–10. London: NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2010. [updated 2010 Nov 25; cited 2011 Jan 08]. Available from http://www.ic.nhs.uk/webfiles/publications/007_Primary_Care/pharmserv0010/General_Pharmaceutical_Services_England_2000-01_2009-10_report.pdf.
  8. 8.
    Whittngton Z, Cantrill J, Hassell K, Bates F, Noyce PR. Community pharmacy management of minor conditions—the “Care at the chemist” scheme. Pharm J. 2001;266(7141):425–8.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vohra S. A community pharmacy minor ailment scheme—effective, rapid and convenient. Pharm J. 2006;276(7406):754–6.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parmentier H, Golding S, Ashworth M, Rowlands G. Community pharmacy treatment of minor ailments in refugees. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2004;29(5):465–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parkinson J. Minor ailments schemes can improve patients’ access to treatment and advice. Pharm Pract. 2005;15(5):215–7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kemper N. Minor ailments scheme now involves over a third of Sheffield’s pharmacists. Prescr Med Manag. 2004;272(Mar 20):PM2.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baqir W, Todd A, Learoyd T, Sim A, Morton L. Cost effectiveness of community pharmacy minor ailment scheme. Int J Pharm Pract. 2010;2(Suppl):3.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paudyal V, Hansford D, Scott Cunningham IT, Stewart D. Cross-sectional survey of community pharmacists’ view of the electronic minor ailment service in Scotland. Int J Pharm Pract. 2010;18(4):194–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wagner A, Noyce PR, Ashcroft DM. Changing patient consultation patterns in primary care: an investigation of uptake of the minor ailments service in Scotland. Health Policy. 2011;99(1):44–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flint L, River P. Evaluation of the Pharmacy First Service. Research and Evaluation Services, 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Whittngton Z, Hassell K, Cantrill J, Noyce PR. Care at the chemist: A question of Access - A feasibility study comparing community pharmacist and general practice management of minor ailments. University of Manchester, 2001.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schfheutle E, Noyce P, Sheehy C. Direct supply of medicines in Scotland: evaluation of a pilot scheme [Internet]. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research; 2003 [updated 2006 May 22; cited 2011 Jan 08]. Available from http://scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/47034/0029655.pdf.
  19. 19.
    Sheehy C, Jones L. Direct supply of medicines in Scotland: extended monitoring of a pilot scheme [Internet]. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research; 2003 [updated 2006 May 22; cited 2011 Jan 08]. Available from http://www.culturalcommission.co.uk/Resource/Doc/47034/0029654.pdf.
  20. 20.
    Islington Primary Care Trust. Islington minor ailments pilot scheme evaluation report (final copy)—October 2004; 2004.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pumtong S, Boardman H, Anderson C. Pharmacists’ perspectives on the pharmacy first minor ailments scheme. Int J Pharm Pract. 2008;16(2):73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yamane T. Statistics: an introductory analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Harper&Row; 1967.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ware J, Hays RD, Davies AR. The patient satisfaction questionnaire [Internet]. California (CA): RAND Corporation; 1994 [updated 2009 Oct 26; cited 2010 Nov 03]. Available from http://www.rand.org/health/surveys/PSQIII.html, http://www.rand.org/health/surveys_tools/psq/psq3_survey.pdf.
  24. 24.
    Ware J. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Prog Plan. 1983;6(3–4):247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Watson M, Walker A, Bond C. Views about the treatment of vaginal symptoms in community pharmacies. Pharm J. 2000;265(7114):R43.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Philips Z, Whynes D, Parnham S, Slack R, Earwicker S. The role of community pharmacists in prescribing medication for the treatment of head lice. J Public Health Med. 2001;23(2):114–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Anonymous. NPA wants more consultations areas. Pharm J. 2002;268(7200):715.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Buisson J. How to make space for a consultation room in your community pharmacy. Pharm J. 2005;275(7378):689–91.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anderson C, Blenkinsopp A. Community pharmacy supply of emergency hormonal contraception: a structured literature review of international evidence. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(1):272–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Somying Pumtong
    • 1
  • Helen F. Boardman
    • 2
  • Claire W. Anderson
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of PharmacySrinakharinwirot UniversityNakhonnayokThailand
  2. 2.Division of Social Research in Medicines and Health, School of PharmacyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations