Exploring pharmacist–customer communication: the established blood pressure measurement episode
- 109 Downloads
Objective To characterize the communication ritual in the pharmacist–customer dyad during a blood pressure measurement and counselling episode. Setting A Portuguese urban community pharmacy. Method An exploratory, cross-sectional design was used. Participants were purposively selected and data collected via audio recording, as well as demographics and clinical information via questionnaire. Encounters’ verbal content was transcribed verbatim, utterances identified, time stamped, and classified according to a coding scheme of fifteen categories. All data was statistically analyzed using SPSSv17. Main outcome measures Four dialogue structures: speaker turn, interactivity, turn density and turn duration measurements. Results From a total of 51 participants, 72.5% were female with a median age of 66 years. The average systolic blood pressure was 140 mmHg, while the diastolic was 78 mmHg. The blood pressure measurement episode lasted for 5:35 min, with an average of 81 utterances. From all utterances registered, 55.3% were produced by the customer. Visits averaged 38 speaker turns, with an interactivity rate of approximately 7 turns per episode minute. For pharmacists, turn duration averaged 7.0 s and turn density 2.1 utterances. The customers’ turns comprised a mean of 8.0 s, with 2.4 utterances. Longer episodes were related to more speaker turns and greater customer turn density and duration, but lower dialogue interactivity. The interactivity rate was also lower when the customers’ utterances increased. Pharmacists asked more questions (essentially closed ones), while the customers gave more information. No significant associations were observed between elderly/non-elderly and gender in relation to all communication variables. However, an increased number of speaker turns and closed-questions were associated to a higher systolic pressure. Conclusion It seems that pharmacists tend to control the content of the dialogue, while customers have more influence on the visit duration and interactivity. Specific hypertensive episodes induce a higher information search. Since the closed questioning format was prevalent, it seems that open information exchange was limited, mainly serving confirmation purposes rather than having a true exploratory nature. Although talk dominance is balanced, further analysis is required to better inform these results, which would confirm the low interactivity and the reduced information-seeking behaviour showed in the counselling episodes.
KeywordsBlood pressure measurement Community pharmacy Pharmacist–customer communication Portugal
The authors would like to thank the community pharmacy ‘Tovar Chaves’ for the collaboration with this study.
No external sources of funding for this work were obtained.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
- 3.West R, Turner L. Introducing communication theory: analysis and application. 2nd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2004. ISBN 0-7674-3034-4.Google Scholar
- 8.Roter DL. The Roter Method of Interaction Process Analysis. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health [Online]. 2006 [cited 2009 Apr 10]. Available from: URL: http://www.rias.org/manual.
- 11.[The changes in Community Pharmacy]. ROF—The Portuguese Pharmaceutical Society Magazine. 2007;80:6–10.Google Scholar
- 14.World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Pharmacy-based hypertension management model: protocol and guidelines. Copenhagen: WHO; 2005.Google Scholar
- 15.Sleath B. Pharmacist question-asking in New Mexico community pharmacies. Am J Pharm Educ. 1995;59:374–9.Google Scholar
- 16.Sleath B. Pharmacist-patient relationships: authoritarian, participatory, or default? Patient Educ Couns. 1996;28:253–63.Google Scholar
- 17.Fritsch MA, Lamp KC. Low counseling rates in the Kansas City, Missouri, metropolitan area. Ann Pharmacother. 1997;31:985–91.Google Scholar
- 21.Tully MP, Temple B. The demographics of pharmacy’s clientele—a descriptive study of the British general public. Int J Pharm Pract. 1999;7:172–81.Google Scholar
- 22.Bennett EV, Jones IF. Investigating health information requests in six community pharmacies. Pharm J. 2000;265:R45.Google Scholar
- 23.Beers MH, Fletcher AJ, Jones TV, Porter R, Berkwits M, Kaplan JL, editors. The Merck manual of medical information—second home edition. 2nd ed. Whitehouse Station (NJ): Merck Research Laboratories; 2003. ISBN 0-911910-35-2.Google Scholar
- 24.Widmaier EP, Raff H, Strang K. Vander, Sherman & Luciano’s human physiology—the mechanisms of body function. 9th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2004. p. 394–5. ISBN 0-07-288074-0.Google Scholar
- 25.Schommer JC. Patients’ expectations and knowledge of patient counseling services that are available from pharmacists. Am J Pharm Educ. 1997;61:402–6.Google Scholar