Advertisement

Pharmacy World & Science

, 31:609 | Cite as

A qualitative glimpse at pharmaceutical care practice

  • Niurka María Varela Dupotey
  • Djenane Ramalho de OliveiraEmail author
Commentary

Abstract

This manuscript presents an argument for a broader use of qualitative methodologies to investigate the practice and the surroundings of pharmaceutical care. Albeit the use of qualitative research methods is growing in the health care field, it is still insufficient in the area of pharmaceutical care. Pharmaceutical care, as a patient-centered practice, calls for a more comprehensive and humanistic approach to research. It is our contention that the attempt to understand pharmaceutical care practice from the perspective of patients, pharmacists and other health care professionals, by means of using qualitative methods, would notably contribute to a better assessment of the value of pharmaceutical care programs in the health care system. Moreover, because a deeper understanding of the nuances of this practice can be achieved with the use of qualitative methods, this approach might also assist us in making the necessary changes to create more effective pharmaceutical care practices.

Keywords

Pharmaceutical care Pharmacy practice Qualitative research Qualitative methodology 

Notes

Conflicts of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Sarfatti M. The rise of professionalism: a sociological analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1977. ISBN 0520029380.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hepler C. Pharmacy as a clinical profession. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985;42:1298–306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hepler C, Strand L. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical are. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990;47:533–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faus MJ. Pharmaceutical care as a response to a social need. Ars Pharmaceutica. 2000;41:137–43.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bernsten C, Bjorkman I, Caramona M, Crealey G, Frokjaer B, Grundberger E, et al. Improving the well-being of elderly via community pharmacy-based provision of pharmaceutical care: a multicentre study in seven European countries. Drugs Aging. 2001;18:63–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Isetts BJ. Evaluating effectiveness of the Minnesota medication therapy management care program: final report. University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy; 2007. http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/groups/business_partners/documents/pub/dhs16_140283.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2009.
  7. 7.
    Isetts B, Schondelmeyer S, Artz M, Lenarz L, Heaton A, Wadd W, et al. Clinical and economic outcomes of medication therapy management services: the Minnesota experience. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2008;48:203–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strand L, Cipolle R, Morley P, Frakes M. The impact of pharmaceutical care practice on the practitioner and the patient in the ambulatory practice setting: twenty-five years of experience. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10:3987–4001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Acción Internacional para la Salud (AIS) [International Action for Health]. ¿Social Pharmacy? The chronic ill. Bulletin AIS-LAC No. 7; (updated 2003, October; cited 2009 Feb 3) Available from: http://www.aislac.org . Accessed 03 Feb 2009.
  10. 10.
    Calderón C. Criterios de calidad en la investigacion cualitativa en salud, notas para un comentario necesario [Quality criteria in qualitative research in health, notes for a necessary commentary]. Rev Esp Salud Pública. 2002;76:473–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pérez C. Sobre la metodologia cualitativa [On qualitative methodology]. Rev Esp Salud Pública. 2002;76:373–80.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mobach MP. Pharmaceutical care research: hard of soft? Part II. Pharm World Sci. 2002;24:1–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kairuz T, Crump K, O’Brien A. Perspectives on qualitative research. Part I: an overview of qualitative research. Pharm J. 2007;277:312–4.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Curry LA, Nembhard IM, Bradley EL. Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation. 2009;119:1442–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tulip SC, Cheung P, Campbell D, Walters P. Pharmaceutical care: cultural, practice and professional perspectives. Int J Pharm Pract. 2002;10(suppl):R93.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramalho de Oliveira D. Pharmaceutical care uncovered: an ethnographic study of pharmaceutical care practice (PhD thesis). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota; 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramalho de Oliveira D, Shoemaker S. Achieving patient centeredness in pharmacy practice: openness and the pharmacist’s natural attitude. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2006;46:56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pereira M, Ramalho de Oliveira D. Entendendo a implementação de um Serviço de Atenção Farmacêutica [Understanding the implementation of a pharmaceutical care practice]. Proceedings of the first international seminar for the implementation of pharmaceutical care in SUS; 2006 May 24–26; Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shoemaker S, Ramalho de Oliveira D. Understanding the meaning of medications for patients: the medication experience. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30:86–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gastelurrutia M, Benrimoj S, Castrillon C, de Amezua M, Fernandez-Llimos F, Faus M. Facilitators for practice change in Spanish community pharmacy. Pharm World Sci. 2009;31:32–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niurka María Varela Dupotey
    • 1
  • Djenane Ramalho de Oliveira
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of PharmacyUniversidad de OrienteSantiago de CubaCuba
  2. 2.College of Pharmacy, Department of Social PharmacyUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  3. 3.Medication Therapy Management ProgramFairview Pharmacy ServicesMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations