Care of the stroke patient—communication between the community pharmacist and prescribers in the Republic of Ireland
- 258 Downloads
Objective This study sought to examine the perceptions that community pharmacists have of communication with prescribers in both primary and secondary care in Ireland, with respect to care of stroke patients. Setting Community pharmacies across Ireland, stratified into the four representative administrative regions. Method Survey using a structured postal questionnaire. Main outcome measure Perceptions of communication with prescribers based in primary and secondary care; pharmacy and pharmacy premises demographics. Results A response rate of 52% (n = 314) was achieved. Community pharmacists’ perceptions of information provision from secondary care were low, the majority (83%) never received any information from the hospital, although they would welcome it. Communication with hospital based prescribers was considered by most (93%) to be poor. The majority (greater than 75%) of respondents expressed a desire for greater information provision concerning a stroke patient’s medication and diagnostic information. Pharmacists’ perceptions of interaction with general practitioners were generally regarded as good (63%) although information provision in both directions between pharmacist and general practitioner could be improved. Conclusion The findings of this study indicated that community pharmacists perceive that there is room for improvement in the communication between themselves and prescribers in the primary and secondary care settings, concerning the care of the stroke patient. This highlights the need for the development of formal communication channels between community pharmacists and other members of the healthcare team involved in the care of the stroke patient. However, the challenges of communicating patient information across healthcare sectors are recognized.
KeywordsCerebrovascular accident Communication Community pharmacy Ireland Medication reconciliation Medication safety Stroke
We acknowledge the input of Coman Hennelly, Fionnuala Coleman, Kathleen Morgan and Lorna Conlan in administering the questionnaires and inputting data; the support of Prof. Hannah McGee, Dr Anne Hickey and Dr Frances Horgan for their comments and review through out the entire project. We also acknowledge the support of Dr James Barlow in reviewing drafts of the manuscript.
Conflict of interests statement
- 1.Mackay J, Mensah GA. The atlas of heart disease and stroke. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.Google Scholar
- 2.Horgan F, Hickey A, McGee H, O’Neill D. Irish National Audit of Stroke Care. Dublin: Irish Heart Foundation; 2008. http://www.irishheart.ie/iopen24/pub/strokereports/stroke_report.pdf.
- 3.Council on Stroke of the Irish Heart Foundation. Towards excellence in stroke care in Ireland. Dublin: Irish Heart Foundation; 2000.Google Scholar
- 4.Health Services Executive. National shared services primary care reimbursement services. Statistical analysis of claims and payments. Dublin. 2007. http://www.hse.ie/eng/PCRS/PCRS_Publications/2007_Report.pdf).
- 7.Cook RI, Render M, Woods DD. Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety. BMJ. 2000;18;320(7237):791–4.Google Scholar
- 8.Duggan C, Feldman R, Hough J, Bates I. Reducing adverse prescribing discrepancies following hospital discharge. Int J Pharm Pract. 1998;6:77–82.Google Scholar
- 11.Minister for Health and Children. Regulation of retail pharmacy businesses regulations, Statutory Instrument (S. I). no. 488 of 2008. ISBN 978-1-4064-4366-0. http://www.attorneygeneral.ie/esi/2008/B26511.pdf).
- 12.Royal College of Physicians. National sentinel stroke audit phase I (organisational audit) 2006 phase II (clinical audit) 2006. London; 2007.Google Scholar
- 13.Smith F. Health services research methods in pharmacy: survey research. Part 1. Design, samples and response. Int J Pharm Pract. 1997;5:152–66.Google Scholar
- 14.Crawford VLS, Dinsmore JG, Stout RW, Donnellan C, O’Neill D, McGee H. Stroke presentation and hospital management. Comparison of neighbouring healthcare systems with differing health policies. Stroke. 2009;40 (published online before print 16 Apr 2009). doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.545376.
- 16.Grimes T. The quality of medication information imparted at acute hospital discharge. Crossing the quality chasm from hospital to home. Medication Safety Seminar, 2007; Dublin. Clinical Indemnity Scheme, 2007.Google Scholar
- 17.Grimes T, Delaney T, Kelly JG, Graham IM. Medicines management immediately post hospital discharge. Implications for communication and safety. Ir Pharm J. 2008;86(2):8–14.Google Scholar
- 20.Health Services Executive. Code of practice for integrated discharge planning, Dublin. 2008. http://www.hse.ie/eng/Publications/Hospitals/Code_of_practice_for_integrated_discharge_planning.pdf).
- 21.Madden D. Building a culture of patient safety. Report of the commission on patient safety and quality assurance. Dublin: Department of Health and Children; 2008. ISBN 978-1-4064-2183-5.Google Scholar
- 24.Martin B, Yip B, Hearty M, Marletta S, Hill R. Outcome, functional recovery and unmet needs following acute stroke. Experience of patient follow-up at 6 to 9 months in a newly established stroke service. Scott Med J. 2002;6:136–7.Google Scholar
- 30.Department of Health and Children. Primary care—a new direction. Dublin: Government Publishing Office; 2001. ISBN 0-7557-1179-3. http://www.dohc.ie/publications/primary_care_a_new_direction.html).
- 32.Government HM. Pharmacy in England. Building on strength—delivering the future. Norwich: Crown copyright; 2008.Google Scholar
- 33.Maddux MS, Dong BJ, Miller WA, Nelson KM, Raebel MA, Raehl CL, et al. A vision of pharmacy’s future roles, responsibilities, and manpower needs in the United States. Pharmacotherapy. 2000;20(8 I):991–1020.Google Scholar
- 34.Edmunds J, Calnan MW. The reprofessionalisation of community pharmacy? An exploration of attitudes to extended roles for community pharmacists amongst pharmacists and general practitioners in the United Kingdom. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(7):943–55. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00393-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar