Pharmacy World & Science

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 202–208

Comparison of two types of TPN prescription methods in preterm neonates

  • Maria Skouroliakou
  • Katerina Koutri
  • Maria Stathopoulou
  • Ekaterini Vourvouhaki
  • Ifigenia Giannopoulou
  • Antonios Gounaris
Research Article

Abstract

Objective Total parenteral nutrition is commonly used in neonates’ intensive care units for nutritional support of preterm neonates. Adequacy and safety of parenteral nutrition support are amongst the major concerns of neonates’ therapy. Parenteral nutrition prescription in Greek hospitals is not based on standardized protocols, thus resulting in wide diversity of formulations. In this study, the results of utilization of standardized computerized parenteral nutrition protocols and regimens for neonates are compared to the results of protocols and regimens prescribed by individual neonatologists on neonates’ outcome (weight changes, adequacy of parenteral nutrition, days of hospitalization, clinical outcome). Setting The study took place at “Mitera” Maternity Hospital of Greece. Method Two groups of 30 preterm infants (28–36 weeks) with respiratory failure were recruited for the study. They were admitted in a Greek maternity hospital and they all received total parenteral nutrition support in neonates’ intensive care unit. Standardized, computer based protocols were applied for the prescription of parenteral nutrition formulations in the first group, while on the other, regimens prescribed by neonatologists were used. Main outcome measures: Macro- and micronutrients provided by the different total parenteral nutrition protocols were recorded. Body weight was measured, blood count and biochemical profile were performed at the beginning and at the end of parenteral nutrition support. The number of days of total parenteral nutrition support as well as the total number of days of hospitalization was recorded. Results Standardized protocols provided more energy (P-value: 0.05), protein (P-value: 0.023) and micronutrients than the non-standardised. Neonates that receive standardized total parenteral nutrition gained weight (+44 ± 114 g) and had better blood count and biochemical values during total parenteral nutrition support compared to the other group, that lost weight during total parenteral nutrition support (−53 ± 156 g). These differences were also statistically significant (P value < 0.05). Regarding the total days of hospitalization, no differences were found between the two groups. Conclusion The use of standardized protocols in preterm neonates resulted in more adequate provision of nutrients, weight gain and better blood count profile compared with protocols prescribed by individual physicians.

Keywords

Computer based calculations Greece Preterm neonates Standardized TPN Total parenteral nutrition 

References

  1. 1.
    Puntis JW. Nutritional support in the premature newborn. Post Med J. 2006;82:192–8. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.038109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Valentine CJ, Puthoff TD. Enhancing parenteral nutrition therapy for neonates. Nutr Clin Pract. 2007;22:183–93. doi:10.1177/0115426507022002183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu V. Extrauterine growth restriction in preterm infants: importance of optimizing nutrition in neonatal intensive care units. Croat Med J. 2005;46:737–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evans RA, Thureen P. Early feeding strategies in preterm and critically ill neonates. Neonatal Netw. 2001;20:7–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thureen PJ, Hay WW Jr. Early aggressive nutrition in preterm infants. Semin Neonatol. 2001;6:403–15. doi:10.1053/siny.2001.0061.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Griffiths RD. Too much of a good thing: the curse of overfeeding. Crit Care. 2007;11:176. doi:10.1186/cc6165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors. Nutrition support for low birth weight infants. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.. 1993;17:33SA–8SA.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    National Advisory Group on Standards and Practice Guidelines for Parenteral Nutrition. Safe Practices for parenteral nutrition formulations. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997;22:49–66. doi:10.1177/014860719802200249.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skouroliakou M, Konstantinou D, Papasarantopoulos P, Matthaiou C. Computer assisted total parenteral nutrition for pre-term and sick term neonates. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27:305–10. doi:10.1007/s11096-005-2462-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Street JL, Montgomery D, Alder SC, Lambert DK, Gerstmann DR, Christensen RD. Implementing feeding guidelines for NICU patients <2000 g results in less variability in nutrition outcomes. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30:515–8. doi:10.1177/0148607106030006515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lenclen R, Crauste-Manciet S, Narcy P, Boukhouna S, Geffray A, Guerrault MN, et al. Assessment of implementation of a standardized parenetral formulation for early nutritional support of very preterm infants. Eur J Pediatr. 2006;165:512–8. doi:10.1007/s00431-006-0124-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Whitfield JM, Hendrikson H. Prevention of protein deprivation in the extremely low birth weight infant: a nutritional emergency. Proc Bayl Univ Med Cent. 2006;19:229–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yeung MY. Postnatal growth, neurodevelopment and altered adiposity after preterm birth-from a clinical nutrition perspective. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95:909–17. doi:10.1080/08035250600724507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McLeod G, Sherriff J. Preventing postnatal growth failure-the significance of feeding when the preterm infant is clinically stable. Early Hum Dev. 2007;83:659–65. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.07.010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pallotto EK, Kilbride HW. Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49:257–69. doi:10.1097/00003081-200606000-00008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hack M. Young adult outcome of very-low-birth-weight children. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;11:127–37. doi:10.1016/j.siny.2005.11.007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Orzalesi M. Vitamins and the premature. Biol Neonate. 1987;52(suppl 1):97–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mactier H, Weaver LT. Vitamin A and preterm infants: what we know, what we don’t know, and what we need to know. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:103–8. doi:10.1136/adc.2004.057547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Debier C. Vitamin E during pre- and postnatal periods. Vitam Horm. 2007;76:357–73. doi:10.1016/S0083-6729(07)76013-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Atkinson SA. Special nutritional needs of infants for prevention of and recovery from bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Nutr. 2001;131:942S–6S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tyson JE, Wright LL, Oh W, Kennedy KA, Mele L, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Vitamin A supplementation for extremely-low-birth-weight infants. National institute of child health and human development neonatal research network. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1962–8. doi:10.1056/NEJM199906243402505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Darlow BA, Graham PJ. Vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and mortality in very low birthweight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:CD000501.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Petrich C, Voss HV, Lietke K, Gobel U. Vitamin E concentrations in term and preterm newborns and their clinical course. Eur J Pediatr. 1976;122:275–9. doi:10.1007/BF00481507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yeung MY. Influence of early postnatal nutritional management on oxidative stress and antioxidant defence in extreme prematurity. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95:153–63. doi:10.1080/08035250500301133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Salsbury DC. Anemia of prematurity. Neonatal Netw. 2001;20:13–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Donovan R, Puppala B, Angst D, Coyle BW. Outcomes of early nutrition support in extremely low-birth-weight infants. Nutr Clin Pract. 2006;21:395–400. doi:10.1177/0115426506021004395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Skouroliakou
    • 1
  • Katerina Koutri
    • 2
  • Maria Stathopoulou
    • 1
  • Ekaterini Vourvouhaki
    • 1
  • Ifigenia Giannopoulou
    • 1
  • Antonios Gounaris
    • 3
  1. 1.Harokopio University of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.“Mitera” Maternity HospitalAthensGreece
  3. 3.General Hospital of Piraeus “Ag. Panteleimon”PiraeusGreece

Personalised recommendations