Advertisement

Pharmacy World & Science

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 230–237 | Cite as

National implementation of standards of practice for non-prescription medicines in Australia

  • Shalom I. BenrimojEmail author
  • Andrew L. Gilbert
  • Abilio C. de Almeida Neto
  • Fiona Kelly
Research Article

Abstract

In Australia, there are two categories of non-prescription medicines: pharmacy medicines and pharmacist only medicines. Standards were developed to define and describe the professional activities required for the provision of these medicines at a consistent and measurable level of practice. Objective Our objective was to implement nationally a quality improvement package in relation to the Standards of Practice for the Provision of Non-Prescription Medicines. Methods Approximately 50% of Australian pharmacies (n = 2,706) were randomly selected by local registering authorities. Trained pharmacy educators audited each community pharmacy in the study three times, 7 weeks apart on Standards of Practice for the Provision of Non-Prescription Medicines, Visit 1 involved the educator explaining the project and conducting an assessment of the pharmacy’s level of compliance. Behaviour of community pharmacists and their staff in relation to these standards was measured by conducting pseudo-patron visits. Pseudopatron visits were conducted at Visit 2, with the educator providing immediate feedback and coaching and a compliance assessment. Visit 3 involved a compliance assessment, and a second pseudo-patron visit for those pharmacies that had performed poorly at the first visit. Results At Visit 1, the lowest levels of compliance were to the standards relating to the documentation process (44%) and customer care and advice (46%). By Visit 2, more than 80% of pharmacies had met most criteria. At Visit 3, compliance had significantly improved compared to Visits 1 and 2 (P < 0.001). The lowest levels of compliance were to criteria which required written operating procedures for specific tasks, but these also improved significantly over time (P < 0.001). Conclusions Professional practice in relation to the handling of pharmacist only and pharmacy medicines improved considerably as measured by the auditing process, and the results indicate that Australian pharmacies are well-equipped to provide high quality service to consumers of these medicines. The acceptability of national implementation of these standards of practice in Australia indicates that such an approach could be taken internationally.

Keywords

Australia Community pharmacist Implementation Non-prescription OTC Quality improvement Standards of practice Training 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Pharmacy Boards and pharmacy staff in participating in the project.

Conflicts of interest

We declare that Professor Benrimoj, Dr de Almeida Neto, and Dr Kelly have been involved with professional pharmacy organisations in Australia, which may have an interest in the development and implementation of standards of practice for the provision of non-prescription medicines.

Funding

Funding for this project was from the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing through the 3rd Community Pharmacy Agreement Research and Development Program.

References

  1. 1.
    Benrimoj SI. A cost-benefit analysis of pharmacist only (S3) and pharmacy medicines (S2) and risk-based evaluation of the standards. 2005. http://beta.guild.org.au/uploadedfiles/Research_and_Development_Grants_Program/Projects/2001-502_fr.pdf. Accessed Nov 2007.
  2. 2.
    The Industry Commission. Industry Commission Report No. 51. The pharmaceutical industry. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra. 1996. http://www.pc.gov.au/ic/inquiry/51drugs. Accessed Jan 2008. ISBN: 06 4436 257 X.
  3. 3.
    Galbally R. Final report of the review of drugs, poisons, and controlled substances legislation. Secretariat, review of drugs, poisons, and controlled substances legislation, Department of Health and Ageing: Woden ACT. 2001. http://www.tga.gov.au/docs/html/rdpdfr.htm. Accessed Nov 2007. ISBN: 0 642 70511 9.
  4. 4.
    Galbally R. The options paper. Review of drugs, poisons and controlled substances legislation, Department of Health and Ageing: Woden ACT. 2001. http://www.tga.gov.au/docs/pdf/rdpfinb.pdf. Accessed Nov 2007.
  5. 5.
    de Almeida Neto AC, Benrimoj SI, Kavanagh DJ, Boakes RA. Novel educational training program for community pharmacists. Am J Pharm Educ. 2000;64:302–7.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gilbert A, Hocking P, Angley M, Edgecombe S, March G, Quintrell N. Community pharmacy model practices project report. Department of Health and Family Services: Canberra. 1997. http://www.aro.gov.au/aro/researchEntryView.do;jsessionid=IOHNHDHLHANP?id=1536&type=keyword. Accessed Oct 2007.
  7. 7.
    Anon. Can you rely on your pharmacist? Choice. 1993 (March).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benrimoj SI, Gilbert A, Quintrell N, de Almeida Neto AC. Non-prescription medicines: a process for standards development and testing in community pharmacy. Pharm World Sci. 2007;29:386–94. doi: 10.1007/s11096-007-9086-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    International Pharmaceutical Federation. Standards for quality of pharmacy services: good pharmacy practice. 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Association of Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities. Supplemental standards of practice for schedule I, II and III drugs. 2005.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Almeida Neto AC, Kelly FS, Benrimoj SI. Shaping practice behaviour: a novel training methodology. Int J Pharm Pract. 2001;9(3):203–10.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Almeida Neto AC, Benrimoj SI, Kavanagh DJ, Boakes RA. A pharmacy-based protocol and training program for non-prescription analgesics. J Soc Adm Pharm. 2000;17(3):183–92.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    de Almeida Neto AC. Changing pharmacy practice: the Australian experience. Pharm J. 2003;270:235–6.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sigrist T, Benrimoj SI, Hersberger K, Langford L. Changing pharmacists’ and pharmacy assistants’ practice in dealing with direct requests for non-prescription analgesics. Int J Pharm Pract. 2002;10:23–9.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berger K, Eickhoff C, Schulz M. Counselling quality in community pharmacies: implementation of the pseudo customer methodology in Germany. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2005;30:45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2004.00611.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kelly FS. Non-prescription medication: an international perspective of service provision, in Faculty of Pharmacy. Sydney: The University of Sydney; 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shalom I. Benrimoj
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrew L. Gilbert
    • 2
  • Abilio C. de Almeida Neto
    • 1
  • Fiona Kelly
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of PharmacyThe University of Sydney SydneyAustralia
  2. 2.College of PharmacyThe University of South AustraliaAdelaide Australia

Personalised recommendations