Advertisement

Pharmacy World & Science

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 199–207 | Cite as

Roles of medicines counter assistants in advice giving in community pharmacies: a Discourse Analysis

  • Virpi Ylänne
  • Dai N. JohnEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Objective Research in interaction and communication in community pharmacies has been reported in a number of countries but to date, talk at the micro-level in the community pharmacy context in the UK has received virtually no study. The objective of this exploratory study was to identify what light a Discourse Analytic approach could shed to describe the role(s) of Medicines Counter Assistants (MCAs) when dealing with clients relating to health, illness or medicines. Methods Discourse Analysis is a growing field of study which has its roots in linguistics, but also in critical theory, philosophy, sociology, psychology and more. It is used in various ways by social scientists studying spoken and written language in use. Following research ethics approval and informed consent from participants, audio-recordings of staff–client interactions in three community pharmacies in Wales, UK were transcribed and analysed from a Discourse Analytic perspective, focussing on the emerging role of the MCA in the negotiation of advice. Main outcome measure Transcripts of interactions in community pharmacies analysed using Discourse Analysis. Results Ten hours of recordings were made. Of the 41 recorded interactions obtained, 29 involved an MCA regarding health and/or medicines. Example extracts represent different ways in which MCAs are involved in the interactions, ranging from dealing solely with the client, to the MCA dealing with the client but checking advice with the pharmacist, the MCA acting as a gatekeeper, the pharmacist intervening in the MCA–client interaction, the MCA keeping the client ‘on hold’ until the pharmacist is ready to interact with them and the MCA acting as an active intermediary. With the differing involvement, slightly different institutional and participant roles emerge for the MCAs through talk and interaction. Conclusion This exploratory study succeeded in producing transcripts of interactions between MCAs, and clients and indicated that Discourse Analysis is helpful in assisting our understanding of the involvement of MCAs in UK community pharmacy encounters. With regards the negotiation of advice, we have shown how the physical and legal contexts, in addition to the discursive/interactional context, play a part in information delivery, as does the different staff’s access to knowledge.

Keywords

Patient advice Communication Community pharmacy Discourse Analysis Health information Pharmacy counter assistants Roles United Kingdom 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the valuable help of Tish Aoki in data gathering and transcription and the Medicines Counter Assistants, community pharmacists and pharmacy clients who agreed to participate.

Financial support of the study The study was funded by Cardiff University.

References

  1. 1.
    Ward PR, Bissell P, Noyce PR. Medicines counter assistants: roles and responsibilities in the sale of deregulated medicines. Int J Pharm Pract 1998;6:207–15.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    John DN, Evans SW. South-east Wales community pharmacists’ views on the new medicines sales protocols. Pharmaceut J 1996;256:626–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heritage J, Sefi S. Dilemmas of advice: aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first time mothers. In: Drew P, Heritage J, editors. Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992, p. 359–417. ISBN: 05-213-7633-5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Silverman D. Discourses of counselling: HIV counselling as social interaction. London: Sage; 1997. ISBN: 08-039-7662-3.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pilnick A. “Patient counselling” by pharmacists: advice, information, or instruction? Sociol Quart 1999;40:613–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeCapua A, Dunham JF. Strategies in the discourse of advice. J Pragmatics 1993;20:519–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bissell P, Ward PR, Noyce PR. Variation within community pharmacy. Responding to requests for over-the-counter medicines. J Soc Admin Pharm 1997;14:1–15.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bissell P, Ward PR, Noyce PR. Variation within community pharmacy. Responding to the presentation of symptoms. J Soc Admin Pharm 1997;14:105–15.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bissell P, Ward PR, Noyce PR. Variation within community pharmacy. Referring customers to other health professionals. J Soc Admin Pharm 1997;14:116–23.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seston EM, Nicolson M, Hassell K, Noyce PR. “Not just someone stood behind the counter”: the views and experiences of medicines counter assistants. J Soc Admin Pharm 2001;18:122–8.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Banks J, Shaw A, Weiss MC. Walking the line between health care and sales: the role of the medicines counter assistant. Pharm J 2005;274:586–9.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mukerjee D, Blane DB. Pharmaceutical service delivery by community pharmacies in areas of contrasting medical provision. Soc Sci Med 1990;31:1277–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pilnick A. “Patient counselling” by pharmacists: four approaches to the delivery of counselling sequences and their interactional reception. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:835–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    John DN, Housley W. Talk-in-interaction in the community pharmacy setting – a conversation analytic approach. Int J Pharm Pract 2001;9:R45.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pilnick A. Advice giving in community pharmacies: a response concerning methods for future research. J Health Serv Res Policy 1998;3:97–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Evans SW, John DN. A preliminary investigation of the interactions between UK and US community pharmacists and their prescription clients. Int J Pharm Pract 1995;3:157–62.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Atkinson JM, Heritage J. Jefferson’s transcript notation. In: Jaworski A, Coupland N, editors. The discourse reader. London: Routledge; 1999. p. 158–166. ISBN: 04-151-9734-1.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jaworski A, Coupland N, editors. The discourse reader, 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2006. p. 3. ISBN: 04-153-4632-0.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goffman E. Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell; 1981. ISBN: 06-311-2788-7.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arber A, Sawyer L. The role of the receptionist in general practice: a ‘dragon behind the desk?’ Social Soc Sci Med 1985;20:911–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thornborrow J. Power talk. Language and interaction in institutional discourse. London: Pearson; 2002. ISBN 05-823-6879-0.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    RPSGB. Medicines, ethics and practice. A guide for pharmacists. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain; 2006. ISBN: 08-536-9680-2.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pronk MCM, Blom LThG, Jonkers R, Bakker A. Effects of a management technician on structured working in Dutch community pharmacies. Pharm World Sci 2004;26:221–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Mil JWF. Pharmaceutical care in community pharmacy: practice and research in the Netherlands. Ann Pharmacother 2005;39:1720–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Traulsen JM, Noerreslet M. The new consumer of medicine – the pharmacy technicians’ perspective. Pharm World Sci 2004;26:203–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jörgensen TM, Andersson KA, Mårdby A-CM. Beliefs about medicines among Swedish pharmacy employees. Pharm World Sci 2006;28:233–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alte D, Weitschies W, Ritter CA. Evaluation of consultation community pharmacies with mystery shoppers. Ann Pharmacother 2007;41:1023–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Norris PT. Purchasing restricted medicines in New Zealand pharmacies: results from a “mystery shopper” study. Pharm World Sci 2002;24:149–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stromme HK, Haugli A. Communication and interaction between customers and pharmacy personnel in two Norwegian pharmacies – an observational study. Int J Pharm Pract 1996;4:209–13.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sigrist T, Benrimoj SI, Hersberger K, Langford J. Changing pharmacists’ and pharmacist assistants’ practice in dealing with direct requests for non-prescription analgesics. Int J Pharm Pract 2002;10:23–9.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jones EJM, MacKinnon NJ, Tsuyuki RT. Pharmaceutical care in community pharmacies: practice and research in Canada. Ann Pharmacother 2005;39:1527–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Christensen DB, Farris KB. Pharmaceutical care in community pharmacies: practice and research in the US. Ann Pharmacother 2006;40:1400–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Guignard W, Bugnon O. Pharmaceutical care in community pharmacies: practice and research in Switzerland. Ann Pharmacother 2006;40:512–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook. London: Sage; 2002. ISBN 0761919783.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Language and Communication Research, School of English, Communication and PhilosophyCardiff UniversityCardiffWales, UK
  2. 2.Welsh School of PharmacyCardiff UniversityCardiffWales, UK

Personalised recommendations