Advertisement

Pharmacy World & Science

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 136–143 | Cite as

Scottish pharmacists’ views and attitudes towards continuing professional development

  • Ailsa PowerEmail author
  • B. Julienne Johnson
  • H. Lesley Diack
  • Susan McKellar
  • Derek Stewart
  • Steve A. Hudson
Research Article

Abstract

Objectives To summarise Scottish pharmacists’ views and attitudes towards Continuing Professional Development (CPD). Setting Random sample of RPSGB registered Scottish pharmacists. Method A postal questionnaire of pharmacists’ CPD activity, views and attitudes was developed, piloted and sent to 2420 pharmacists. Questions were collated to produce total scores and to rate pharmacists’ motivation and attitudes to CPD separately. The number of CPD hours reported by sector and gender were compared (‘t’ test) and differences identified between hospital, community and primary care in relation to mean motivational attitudinal scores (Mann-Whitney test). Results Five hundred and forty three pharmacists completed the questionnaire (22.4% response rate). In this study 9.8% of the pharmacists reported spending no time on CPD. Comparisons of hours showed primary care pharmacists and hospital pharmacists reported similar times spent on CPD and significantly more time than community pharmacists (68 h and 66 h vs 45 h; P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences between genders were revealed. Internal reliability on motivation and attitude scores ranged from 0.74–0.83 (Cronbach’s alpha). Although scores were similar across sectors of practice in terms of motivation and attitudinal questions, statistical differences were consistent; showing higher scores for separate motivation and attitude among pharmacists in primary care than in hospital or community practice sectors (Mann Whitney test; P < 0.001). Community pharmacists had a statistically significantly lower attitude score than pharmacists in hospital or primary care sectors (Mann Whitney test; P < 0.001). Conclusion There is a section of pharmacists still not participating in CPD. Primary care pharmacists reported most motivation and scored highest in attitude score. Community pharmacists appear to be the sector requiring most support to increase not only their motivation to CPD but also their confidence and ability in participation.

Keywords

Community pharmacists Continuing professional development Hospital pharmacists Pharmacist’s attitude Pharmacist’s views Primary care Scotland 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of final year pharmacy students from The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen and the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow-Thomas Davidson, Dearbhla Kearney, Louise Twitchett, Una Gethins, Damien Mc Donnell, Jennifer Gray, Leanne Hunter, Catriona Mc Garry, Joanna Ming, Eleanor O’Callaghan and Colette O’ Neill, for their assistance in data collection in this collaborative project.

References

  1. 1.
    Achieving excellence in pharmacy through clinical governance. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain’s policy on clinical governance. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. Sept 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Continuing Professional Development: Quality in the new NHS. Department of Health. July 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Learning from Bristol: the report of the public enquiry into children’s heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995. The Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. Summary. July 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A first class service: Quality in the new NHS. Department of Health.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Continuing Professional Development. Quality in the new NHS. Department of Health.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pharmacy in the Future: Implementing the NHS Plan. Department of Health.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kolb, DA. Experiential Learning, New Jersey: 1984. Prentice Hall (0 13 295261 0).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bell HM, Maguire TA, Adair CG, McGartland LF. Perceptions of CPD within the pharmacy profession. IJPP 2001;9(suppl):R55.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mottram DR, Rowe P, Gangani N Al-Khamis Y. Pharmacists’ engagement in continuing education and attitudes towards continuing professional development. Pharm J 2002;268:618–22.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Attewell J, Blenkinsopp A, Black P. Community pharmacists and continuing professional development-a qualitative study of perceptions and current involvement. Pharm J 2005;274:519–23.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Swainson D, Silcock J. Continuing professional development for employee pharmacists: a survey to compare practice in the hospital and community sectors. Pharm J 2004;272:290–3.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hull H, Hunt A, Rutter P. Community pharmacists’ attitudes and approaches to the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain continuing professional development initiatives. IJPP 2003;11:R50.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bollington L. Development of a CPD peer support strategy for hospital pharmacists. Hospital Pharma 2003;10(11):491–4.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tracey J, Arroll B, Barham P, Richmond D. The validity of general practitioners’ self-assessment of knowledge: cross section study. BMJ 1997;315:1426–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Furze G, Pearcey P. Continuing education in nursing: a review of the literature. J adv nursing 1999;29(2):355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Swallow V, Clarke C, Iles S, Harden J. Work based, lifelong learning through professional portfolios: Challenge or reward? Pharm Edu 2006;6:77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Royal Pharmaceutical Society consultation document. Mandatory CPD. Available at www.rpsgb.org.uk.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Attewell JM, Blenkinsopp A, Black P. Community pharmacists and continuing professional development: a study of perceptions and current involvement. IJPP 2002;10(suppl):R9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rouse MJ. Continuing Professional Development in Pharmacy. JAPhA 2004;44:517–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dean B, Jacklin A, Mounsey A, Newton S. CPD implementation in a large NHS trust. Hospital Pharmacist 2001;8:105–8.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    RPSGB database 2006. Accessed 27.11.06.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hassell K, Seston L. Workforce update-joiners, leavers and practising and non-practising pharmacists on the 2006 Register. Pharma J 2006;277:576–8.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hassell K. Full-time workers make up less than half the register. Pharma J 2004;273:625–6.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smith F. Research Methods in Pharmacy Practice, London: 2002. Pharmaceutical Press: 25. (0 85369 481 8)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ailsa Power
    • 1
    Email author
  • B. Julienne Johnson
    • 2
  • H. Lesley Diack
    • 3
  • Susan McKellar
    • 2
  • Derek Stewart
    • 3
  • Steve A. Hudson
    • 2
  1. 1.NHS Education for ScotlandGlasgowScotland
  2. 2.University of Strathclyde GlasgowScotland
  3. 3.The Robert Gordon UniversityAberdeenScotland

Personalised recommendations