Advertisement

Pharmacy World & Science

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 79–85 | Cite as

Reasons for the use of mild analgesics among English students

  • David P. FrenchEmail author
  • Delyth H. James
Research Article

Abstract

Objective Mild analgesics such as paracetamol and ibuprofen are amongst the most commonly used over-the-counter (OTC) drugs. However, little is known about what beliefs people hold about them. The present paper examines: (a) the patterns of mild analgesic usage in a sample of university students, (b) their beliefs about the associated risks and the necessity of taking mild analgesics, and (c) the association between beliefs about analgesics and self-reports of their use. Setting A convenience sample of 333 students studying at a large English University were approached on the University campus. Of these, 291 agreed to participate, yielding an 87% response rate. Method This study employed a cross-sectional design, with all participants completing the same questionnaire concerning their use of mild painkillers, such as paracetamol and ibuprofen, and beliefs about their use. Main outcome measure Four questions asked about their patterns of mild analgesic use in the past month, specifically (a) have they taken analgesics, (b) how often did they take analgesics when they had symptoms, (c) did they take more than a single dose of 1–2 tablets at one time, and (d) did they exceed the maximum dose. Results Almost all of the 291 participants reported symptoms in the past month, with over two thirds treating with mild analgesics, and one sixth exceeding the maximum dose. Only 17% indicated that there were short-term risks of using mild analgesics, although half indicated that there were long-term risks. The risks that were identified generally did not conform with current medical thinking. Perceptions of risks were not generally associated with self-reports of analgesic usage. Rather, respondents who thought analgesics were more necessary were more likely to report taking analgesics, report taking more analgesics, and report exceeding the maximum dose. Conclusion These results indicate the need for caution in current moves to encourage self-medication. If people are unaware of the risks of drugs such as paracetamol or ibuprofen, then they may only contact health professionals after they experience adverse effects

Keywords

Analgesic England Health beliefs NSAIDs OTC Over the counter Paracetamol Risk perception United Kingdom 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The data were collected by Caroline Evans and Léonnie Molloy for their dissertations submitted as part requirement for Bachelor of Science degrees.

Funding

Internal funding by the School of Sport and Exercise Sciences at the University of Birmingham made this study possible.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Blenkinsopp A, Bond C. Over-the-counter medication. London: British Medical Association;2005. ISBN 0-954 8965-2-1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Proprietary Association of Great Britain. Self care: realising the vision (PAGB annual review 2005). London: Proprietary Association of Great Britain; 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hawton K, Simkin S, Deeks J, Cooper J, Johnston A, Waters K, et al. UK legislation on analgesic packs: before and after study of long term effects on poisonings. BMJ 2004;329:1076–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morgan O, Griffiths C, Majeed A. Impact of paracetamol pack size restrictions on poisoning from paracetamol in England and Wales: an observational study. J Public Health 2005;27:19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sheen CL, Dillon JF, Bateman DN, Simpson KJ, MacDonald TM. Paracetamol toxicity: epidemiology, prevention and costs to the health-care system. QJM 2002;95:609–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abbott FV, Fraser MI. Use and abuse of over-the-counter analgesic agents. J Psychiatry Neurosci 1998;23:13–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steiner TJ, Fontebasso M. Headache. BMJ 2002;325:881–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Porteous T, Bond C, Hannaford P, Sinclair H. How and why are non-prescription analgesics used in Scotland? Fam Pract 2005;22:78–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bissell P, Ward PR, Noyce PR. The dependent consumer: reflections of accounts of the risks of non-prescription medicines. Health 2001;5:5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roumie CL, Griffin MR. Over-the-counter analgesics in older adults. Drugs Aging 2004;21:485–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Floyd DL, Prentice-Dunn S, Rogers RW. A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol 2000;30:407–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Milne S, Sheeran P, Orbell S. Prediction and intervention in health-related behavior: a meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol 2000;30:106–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Horne R, Weinman J. Self-regulation and self-management in asthma: exploring the role of illness perceptions and treatment beliefs in explaining non-adherence to preventer medication. Psychol Health 2002;17:17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horne R, Weinman J, Hankins M. The beliefs about medications questionnaire: the development and evaluation of a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of medication. Psychol Health 1999;14:1–24.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Petrie KJ, Weinman J. More focus needed on symptom appraisal. J Psychosom Res 2003;54:401–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Petrie KJ, Wessely S. Modern worries, new technology and medicine—new technologies mean new health complaints. BMJ 2002;324:690–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Horne R, Weinman J. Patients’ beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness. J Psychosom Res 1999;47:555–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Department of Health. The NHS plan: a plan for investment. A plan for reform. London: Department of Health; 2000. ISBN 0101 481829.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Research Centre in Health and Lifestyle Interventions, Faculty of Health and Life SciencesCoventry UniversityCoventryUK
  2. 2.Primary Care/Community PharmacyWelsh School of PharmacyCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations