Advertisement

Pharmacy World & Science

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 109–115 | Cite as

Prevalence of inappropriate prescribing in primary care

  • Lisbeth BregnhøjEmail author
  • Steffen Thirstrup
  • Mogens Brandt Kristensen
  • Lars Bjerrum
  • Jesper Sonne
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

To describe the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing in primary care in Copenhagen County, according to the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) and to identify the therapeutic areas most commonly involved.

Setting

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 212 elderly ( >65 years) polypharmacy patients (five or more different medications) listed to 41 general practitioners (GPs) in the County of Copenhagen.

Method

Patients exposed to polypharmacy were identified via the database recording the drug subsidy system of Danish pharmacies. For each patient, data were collected on subsidised medications prescribed over 3 months by the patients’ own GPs. The GPs were asked to provide baseline information regarding the patients’ medical history and detailed information regarding the subsidised and non-subsidised medications prescribed to the patients. A MAI was scored for medication prescribed to the patients. Topical, dermatological medications and medications not used regularly were excluded.

Results

212 patients were prescribed 1621 medications by their GPs at baseline. In all, 640 (39.5%) of the medications had one or more inappropriate ratings in the 10 criteria making up the MAI. The main part of the patients (94.3%) had one or more inappropriate ratings among their medications.

A total of 12.3% of the medications were rated as ‘not indicated’, 6% were rated as ‘ineffective’, 6.7% were given in an incorrect dose, 0.7% were prescribed with incorrect directions, 1.3% had impractical directions, 0.7% of the drugs had clinically significant drug–drug interactions, 8.6% had clinically significant drug–disease/condition interactions, 3.1% were unnecessary duplications, 16.5% were given in an unacceptable duration and 27.1% of the medications were not the least expensive alternative.

The therapeutic groups most commonly involved in inappropriate prescribing were medications for treatment of peptic ulcer, cardiovascular medications, anti-inflammatory medications, antidepressants, hypnotics and anti-asthmatics.

Conclusion

The overall prescribing quality in primary care in Copenhagen County, Denmark is good. However, the majority of patients used one or more medications with inappropriate ratings. The inappropriate prescribing relates to specific therapeutic groups and criteria, which should be targeted in future interventions.

Keywords

Denmark Elderly General practice Medication Appropriateness Index Polypharmacy Prescribing quality Prevalence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Hørslev Foundation, The Danish Research Foundation for General Practice, The Health Insurance Foundation, and the Copenhagen County Health Administration.

References

  1. 1.
    Buetow SA, Sibbald B, Cantrill JA and Halliwell S (1996). Prevalence of potentially inappropriate long term prescribing in general practice in the United Kingdom, 1980–95: systematic literature review. BMJ 313(7069): 1371–1374 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beers MH, Ouslander JG, Rollingher I, Reuben DB, Brooks J and Beck JC (1991). Explicit criteria for determining inappropriate medication use in nursing home residents. UCLA Division of Geriatric Medicine. Arch Intern Med 151(9): 1825–1832 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beers MH (1997). Explicit criteria for determining potentially inappropriate medication use by the elderly. An Update. Arch Intern Med 157(14): 1531–1536 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu GG and Christensen DB (2002). The continuing challenge of inappropriate prescribing in the elderly: an update of the evidence. J Am Pharm Assoc(Wash.) 42(6): 847–857 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ruths S, Straand J and Nygaard HA (2003). Multidisciplinary medication review in nursing home residents: what are the most significant drug-related problems? The Bergen District Nursing Home (BEDNURS) Study. Qual Saf Health Care 12(3): 176–180 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanlon JT, Artz MB, Pieper CF, Lindblad CI, Sloane RJ, Ruby CM and Schmader KE (2004). Inappropriate medication use among frail elderly inpatients. Ann Pharmacother 38(1): 9–14 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fialová D, Topinková E, Gambassi G, Finné-Soveri H, Jónsson P, Carpenter I, Schroll M, Onder G, Sørbye LW, Wagner C, Reissigová J and Bernabei R (2005). Potentially inappropriate medication use among elderly home care patients in Europe. JAMA 293(11): 1348–1358 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aparasu RR and Mort JR (2004). Prevalence, correlates and associated outcomes of potentially inappropriate psychotropic use in the community-dwelling elderly. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2: 102–111 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Curtis LH, Ostby T, Sendersky V, Hutchison S, Dans PE and Wright A (2004). Inappropriate prescribing for elderly Americans in a large outpatient population. Arch Intern Med 164: 1621–1625 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hanlon JT, Fillenbaum GG, Schmader KE, Kuchibhatla M and Horner RD (2000). Inappropriate drug use among community-dwelling elderly. Pharmacotherapy 20: 575–582 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hanlon JT, Schmader KE, Boult C, Artz MB, Gross CR and Fillenbaum GG (2002). Use of inappropriate prescription drugs by older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 50: 26–34 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Piecoro LT, Browning SR, Prince TS, Ranz TT and Scutchfield FD (2000). A database analysis of potentially inappropriate drug use in an elderly medicaid population. Pharmecotherapy 20: 221–228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hallas J, Gram LF, Grodum E, Damsbo N, Brosen K, Haghfelt T, Harvald B, Beck-Nielsen J, Worm J and Jensen KB (1992). Drug related admissions to medical wards: a population based survey. Br J Clin Pharmacol 33(1): 61–68 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bergman U and Wiholm BE (1981). Drug-related problems causing admission to a medical clinic. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 20(3): 193–200 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Colt HG and Shapiro AP (1989). Drug-induced illness as a cause for admission to a community hospital. J Am Geriatr Soc 37(4): 323–326 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Small SD, Servi D, Laffel G, Sweitzer BJ, Shea BF and Hallisey R (1995). Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA 274(1): 29–34 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Avorn J, McCormick D, Jain S, Eckler M, Benser M, Edmondson AC and Bates DW (2000). Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in nursing homes. Am J Med 109(2): 87–94 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Harrold LR, Rothschild J, Debellis K, Seger AC, Cadoret C, Fish LS, Garber L, Kelleher M and Bates DW (2003). Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA 289(9): 1107–1116 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fitzgerald LS, Hanlon JT, Shelton PS, Landsman PB, Schmader KE, Pulliam CC and Williams ME (1997). Reliability of a modified medication appropriateness index in ambulatory older persons. Ann Pharmacother 31(5): 543–548 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hanlon JT, Schmader KE, Samsa GP, Weinberger M, Uttech KM, Lewis IK, Cohen HJ and Feussner JR (1992). A method for assessing drug therapy appropriateness. J Clin Epidemiol 45(10): 1045–1051 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hansten PD, Horn JR (2004) The Top 100 drug interactions—a guide to patient managementGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmader K, Hanlon JT, Weinberger M, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Lewis I, Uttech K, Cohen HJ and Feussner JR (1994). Appropriateness of medication prescribing in ambulatory elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 42(12): 1241–1247 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmader K, Hanlon JT, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Lewis IK and Weinberger M (1997). Inappropriate prescribing and health outcomes in elderly veteran outpatients. Ann Pharmacother 31(5): 529–533 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Onder G, Landi F, Liperoti R, Fialova D, Gambassi G, Bernabei R. Impact of inappropriate drug use among hospitalized older adults. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 24 (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klarin I, Wimo A and Fastbom J (2005). The association of inappropriate drug use with hospitalisation and mortality: a population-based study of the very old. Drugs Aging 22(1): 69–82 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fitzgerald LS, Hanlon JT, Shelton PS, Landsman PB, Schmader KE, Pulliam CC and Williams ME (1997). Reliability of a Modified Medication Appropriateness Index in ambulatory older persons. Ann Pharmacother 31(5): 543–548 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hanlon JT, Schmader KE, Samsa GP, Weinberger M, Uttech KM, Lewis IK, Cohen HJ and Feussner JR (1992). A method for assessing drug therapy appropriateness. J Clin Epidemiol 45(10): 1045–1051 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisbeth Bregnhøj
    • 1
    Email author
  • Steffen Thirstrup
    • 2
  • Mogens Brandt Kristensen
    • 2
  • Lars Bjerrum
    • 3
  • Jesper Sonne
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Gentofte University HospitalHellerupDenmark
  2. 2.The Danish Medicines AgencyCopenhagen SDenmark
  3. 3.Research Unit of General PracticeUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense CDenmark

Personalised recommendations