Pharmacy World & Science

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 67–72 | Cite as

The quality of self-care counselling by pharmacy practitioners, supported by IT-based clinical guidelines

  • Tommy Westerlund
  • Inga-Lisa Andersson
  • Bertil Marklund
Original Paper

Abstract

Objective

The primary objective of the study was to assess the quality of self-care counselling from pharmacy practitioners, supported by national clinical guidelines. The research questions addressed (1) the distribution of symptoms among customers in need of self-care counselling, (2) the quality of the self-care advice provided by pharmacy practitioners, (3) the degree of customer compliance with appropriate pharmacy advice versus the extent of symptom relief, (4) and versus a subsequent medical care visit, and (5) which resource the customers would have turned to in the first place for their ailments, had the pharmacy practitioner not been available.

Setting

Three large community pharmacies with non-prescription self-selection departments in central Sweden.

Methods

Ten pharmacy practitioners counselled all customers ≥18 years old, with whom a dialogue was initiated on advice or products for self-care. The counselling was based on national clinical guidelines for self-care advice in the form of a software decision support program. The data collection consisted of documentation of background customer information, independent assessments of the quality of the advice provided and of telephone follow-ups.

Results

Of all documented symptoms (n = 250), the most common were allergy (26.4%), musculoskeletal symptoms (8.4%) and dyspepsia (7.2%). Independent assessments of the documentation by a physician and a pharmacist found that self-care advice was appropriate to give 97.6% of the customers and that the advice provided was correct in 88.4% of the cases. In total, 217 cases (86.8%) were fully approved by both the physician and the pharmacist. Among the 182 customers who claimed that they complied completely with appropriate advice provided, 135 (74.2%) experienced a great improvement in symptoms. Among the 21 who had only partly followed the advice, six (28.6%) reported the same level of improvement (p < 0.001). If the pharmacy practitioner had not been available, 56.8% of the customers would have turned to medical care in the first instance.

Conclusions

The study demonstrates the high quality of pharmacy practitioners’ self-care counselling supported by IT-based national clinical guidelines, including a favourable impact on customers’ ailments. Furthermore, it reveals that pharmacy practitioners greatly relieve the pressure on the health-care system, resulting in reduced costs to society.

Keywords

Clinical guidelines Counselling Non-prescription drugs Outcomes Pharmacy practitioner Quality Self-care Sweden 

References

  1. 1.
    Blenkinsopp A, Bradley C. Patients, society, and the increase in self medication. Br Med J 1996; 312:629–32Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Soller RW. Evolution of self-care with over-the-counter medications. Clin Ther 1998; 20 Suppl C:C134–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prospecting for Profits in the OTC market. Proceedings of two educational sessions presented at APhA 2000, the American Pharmaceutical Association’s 147th Annual Meeting and Exposition, March 13, 2000, Washington DC. APhA Highlights Newsl 2000; 3(4):1–6Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Isacson D, Bingefors C. On Rx switches and access to over-the-counter drugs in Sweden. J Soc Adm Pharm 1999; 16:13–25Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carlsten A, Wennberg M, Bergendal L. The influence of Rx-to-OTC changes on drug sales. Experiences in Sweden 1980–1994. J Clin Pharm Ther 1996; 21:423–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vingilis E, Brown U, Hennen B. Common colds. Reported patterns of self-care and health care use. Can Fam Phys 1999; 45:2644–6, 2649–52Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bissell P, Ward PR, Noyce PR. Mapping the contours of risk: consumer perceptions of non-prescription medicines. J Soc Adm Pharm 2000; 17:136–42Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Westerlund LOT, Marklund BRG, Handl WHA, Thunberg ME, Allebeck P. Nonprescription drug-related problems and pharmacy interventions. Ann Pharmacother 2002; 35:1343–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Communications from the European Commission concerning health promotion, information, education and training within the framework for community action in the field of public health. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission; 1994Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marklund B. Symptom advice intervention in pharmacies (Swedish). Stockholm: Apoteket AB; 2002Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marklund B. Symptom advice intervention in pharmacies (IT-version, Swedish). Stockholm: Apoteket AB; 2004Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marklund B, Westerlund T, Brånstad J-O, Sjöblom M. Referrals of dyspeptic self-care patients from pharmacies to physicians, supported by clinical guidelines. Pharm World Sci 2003; 25(4):168–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Westerlund T, Allebeck P, Marklund B, Andersson I-L, Brånstad J-O, Sjöblom M. Evaluation of a model for counseling patients with dyspepsia in Swedish community pharmacies. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2003; 60:1336–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sihvo S. Utilization and appropriateness of self-medication in Finland. Academic Dissertation, University of Helsinki, Medical Faculty, Department of Public Health and National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Health and Social Sciences; 2000Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Erickson AK. Rx-to-OTC switches offer golden counselling opportunities. Pharm Today 2002; 8(6):1, 5, 35Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zellmer WA. Role of pharmacy organizations in transforming the profession: The case of pharmaceutical care. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2001; 58:2041–9Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Executive Summary for the Community Pharmacy Research Consortium. The Public’s Use of Community Pharmacies as a Primary Health Care Resource. UK: The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain; 1999Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Young D. Many consumers misuse non-prescription medicines. ASHP 25 January 2002. Available at: http://www.ashp.com/public/news/breaking (accessed 28 January 2002)
  19. 19.
    Hong SH, Spadaro D, West D, Tak SH. Patient valuation of pharmacist services for self care with OTC medications. J Clin Pharm Ther 2005; 30(3):193–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tully MP, Hassell K, Noyce PR. Advice-giving in community pharmacies in the UK. J Health Serv Res Policy 1997; 2(1):38–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bissell P, Ward PR, Noyce PR. Appropriateness measurement: application to advice-giving in community pharmacies. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51(3):343–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krishnan HS, Schaefer M. Evaluation of the impact of pharmacist’s advice giving on the outcomes of self-medication in patients suffering from dyspepsia. Pharm World Sci 2000; 22:102–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Herborg H, Frokjaer B, Sondergaard B, et al. Improved self-medication and self care. A development- and pilot-project for a controlled study (in Danish). Hillerod, Denmark: Danish College of Pharmacy Practice; 2001Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tommy Westerlund
    • 1
    • 2
  • Inga-Lisa Andersson
    • 3
  • Bertil Marklund
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Research and DevelopmentApoteket ABHelsingborg and StockholmSweden
  2. 2.Social Medicine, Department of Public Health and Community MedicineGöteborg UniversityGöteborgSweden
  3. 3.Apoteket ABStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Research and DevelopmentHalland County CouncilFalkenbergSweden
  5. 5.Primary Health Care, Department of Public Health and Community MedicineGöteborg UniversityGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations