Retrospective analysis of medication incidents reported using an on-line reporting system
- 203 Downloads
To examine the types of prescribing, administration and dispensing incidents reported to an on-line incident-reporting scheme and determine the types of healthcare professionals responsible for reporting such incidents.
Retrospective analysis of medication-related incidents reported to an on-line incident-reporting scheme in a large (1000-bed) teaching hospital in the UK.
Main outcome measures
Frequency and type of incidents, the discipline of the health care professional who reported the incident and the stage in the medication use process (prescribing, dispensing, or administration) at which the incident occurred.
Over a 26-month study period, there were 495 medication-related incidents reported, of which 38.6% (191) were classified to be a “near miss”. Medication-related incidents were reported most often at the stages of administration (230, 46.5%) and prescribing (192, 38.8%), whilst incidents involving dispensing or supply of medication were reported less often (73, 14.7%). Of all the incidents, pharmacists reported 51.9% (257), nursing staff reported 37.6% (186), and doctors reported 9.1% (45). Cardiovascular (149, 30.1%), central nervous system (106, 21.4%), and antibiotic/anti-infective medication (71, 14.3%) were the most common therapeutic categories associated with reports of medication-related incidents.
An on-line reporting scheme can be used to monitor medication-related incidents at key stages in the medication-use process in secondary care. The types of incidents reported by health care professionals differ markedly, with fewer medication-related incidents being reported by doctors. Future research should explore the prevailing safety culture amongst the different health care disciplines, and examine the impact that information technology has on the willingness of health care professionals to report adverse incidents.
KeywordsHospital Medication incidents Medication errors Medication use Reporting United Kingdom
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Department of Health. An organisation with a memory: a report from an expert working group on learning from adverse events in the NHS. London: Department of Health; 2000.Google Scholar
- 3.Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err is Human. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1999.Google Scholar
- 4.Department of Health. Building a safer NHS for Patients: improving medication safety. London: Department of Health; 2004.Google Scholar
- 5.Department of Health. Building a safer NHS for Patients: Implementing and Organization with a Memory. London: Department of Health; 2001.Google Scholar
- 6.Department of Health. Doing less harm. Improving the safety and quality of care through reporting, analysing and learning from adverse incidents involving NHS patients—Key requirements for health care providers. London: Department of Health; 2001.Google Scholar
- 10.British National Formulary 48 (September 2004). London: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain; 2004.Google Scholar
- 15.The Audit Commission. A spoonful of sugar: medicines management in NHS hospitals. Wetherby: Audit Commision Publications; 2001.Google Scholar