Risks and concerns about supplementary prescribing: survey of primary and secondary care pharmacists
- 158 Downloads
Objective (of the study)
To provide data on the views of chief pharmacists (CPs) and primary care trust pharmacists (PCTPs) on the risks and concerns surrounding supplementary prescribing.
Secondary and primary care within England.
Postal questionnaire surveys of chief pharmacists and primary care trust pharmacists.
Main Outcome Measure
Significance of the association between the extracted factors.
The response rate was 68% for both the primary care (183/271) and secondary care surveys (97/143). The survey tool was subjected to factor analysis and reliability testing. For both sectors, the three factors that were extracted described concerns over the training model for supplementary prescribing, concerns about the professional competency/responsibility of the supplementary prescribers once trained, and positivity about the implementation of supplementary prescribing. For both sectors, as trusts have more experience of supplementary prescribing by nurses, the respondents had less concerns about the supplementary prescribing training model. For secondary care, as the total number of pharmacists employed within the trust increases, the respondents had less concerns over the limitations of the supplementary prescribing training model.
Although both sectors have concerns over the training model for supplementary prescribing and also professional competence and responsibility once trainees qualify, there is overall a positive attitude towards supplementary prescribing and there is a belief that pharmacists wish to take this role on.
KeywordsSupplementary Prescribing Pharmacist Factor Analysis Questionnaire Nursing Risk United Kingdom Opinions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors would like to thank all of the pharmacists who took the time to complete the questionnaire survey, Dr Jenny Scott, lecturer in clinical pharmacy and pharmacy practice and Dr Marjorie Weiss, senior lecturer in pharmacy practice, for advice on the presentation and content of the paper, and Dr Gordon Taylor, medical statistician, for advice on statistical analysis.
This study was financially supported by the University of Bath.
- 2.Nurse and pharmacist prescribing powers extended. DoH: London 2005. (WWW)http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/PressReleases/PressReleasesNotices/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4122999&chk=Mjc1MS (November 11th 2005)
- 4.Farrell J, North-Lewis P, Cross M. Pharmacist prescribing in the United States. Pharm J 1997; 259:187–190Google Scholar
- 6.Proposals for supplementary prescribing by nurses and pharmacists and proposed amendments to the prescription only medicines (human use) order 1997. London: MCA; 2002. p. 1–19Google Scholar
- 7.Outcome of the consultation exercise on proposals for supplementary prescribing by nurses and pharmacists. London: DoH; 2002Google Scholar
- 8.Lord S. The interface – steps towards seamless care. Hosp Pharm 1999; 6:83–84Google Scholar
- 9.Hebron B, Jay C. Pharmaceutical care for patients undergoing elective ENT surgery. Pharm J 1998; 260:65–66Google Scholar
- 11.Booth CD. Pharmacist-managed anticoagulant clinics: a review. Pharm J 1998; 261:623–625Google Scholar
- 12.Cattell R, Conroy C, Sheikh A. Pharmacist intergration into the discharge process: a qualitative and quantitative impact assessment. Int J Pharm Pract 2001; 9:59–64Google Scholar
- 13.Taheny K, Tyrell A, Cairns C, Bunn R. Influence of patient focused care on managing medicines for discharge. Pharm J␣1999; 262:368–371Google Scholar
- 14.Leech D. Patient directed pharmacy services – do they benefit their patients? Hosp Pharm 2000; 7:263–264Google Scholar
- 15.Jacklin A, Patel K, Almossawi O. A discharge pharmacist service improves the timeliness, quality and cost of discharge. Pharm in Pract 2001; 11:100–102Google Scholar
- 16.Ketley D, Qualie MJ, Godfrey BD. The near patient clinical pharmacist 1. From design to pilot. Pharm J 1998; 261:247–249Google Scholar
- 17.Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper and Row; 2000. 0321189000Google Scholar
- 18.NHS executive information policy unit. Information for health: an information strategy for the modern NHS 1998–2005, a national strategy for local implementation. London: DOH; 1998Google Scholar
- 22.Dawoud D, Goodye LI, Lovejoy A, Greene RJ. Perceptions and perceived competencies of pharmacists on supplementary prescribing training courses in London and the South East. Int J Pharm Pract 2004; 12:R40Google Scholar
- 23.Antoniou S, Webb DG, Davies JG, Bates I, McRobbie D, Wright J, et al. General level competency framework improves the clinical practice of hospital pharmacists: final results of the south of England trial. Int J Pharm Pract 2004; 12:R22–R23Google Scholar
- 25.No obstacle to pharmacists prescribing. Pharm J 2002; 269:450Google Scholar