Advertisement

Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 96–103 | Cite as

Psychometric assessment and application of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with information on cancer treatment

  • Andrea Liekweg
  • Meike Eckhardt
  • Suzanne C. Malfair Taylor
  • Edgar Erdfelder
  • Ulrich JaehdeEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Objective: Pharmaceutical care follows a needs-based approach. Cancer patients form a group with particular needs. Information about cancer treatment plays an important role in terms of coping strategies, initiation of self-care behaviour, and quality of life. In order to develop pharmaceutical care strategies for cancer patients, it is important to assess patients’ information needs. This survey aims at providing a suitable instrument to measure patient satisfaction with information on cancer treatment and to reveal the present situation in Germany.

Methods: Since there was no suitable German measure available, the Canadian ‘Patient Satisfaction with Cancer Treatment Education (PS-CaTE) questionnaire’ was translated into German and its test quality criteria were examined. Selected socio-demographic variables were added to the original version of the questionnaire to facilitate subgroup analysis. A pre-test was performed to assess the reliability of the adapted instrument.The questionnaire was distributed among patients of cooperating hospitals, oncology practices, and self-aid groups over Germany.

Results: The pre-test established a good reliability of the instrument. In the main survey, overall satisfaction, on a 5- point Likert scale, showed a median score of 3.5, where 5 represented the highest degree of satisfaction. A subscale analysis revealed that satisfaction with information provided on adverse events and complementary treatment options was lower compared to the information provided on cancer treatment. A stepwise multiple-regression analysis identified three significant predictors of satisfaction: a) diagnosis of a mammary carcinoma; b) recent diagnosis; and c) treatment by a primary-care oncologist. Patients with a mammary carcinoma and patients treated by a primary-care oncologist were less satisfied, and patients with a recent diagnosis were more satisfied compared to other patients. In comparison to other information sources, pharmacists still seem to play a minor role as a source of information for patients.

Conclusions: The version of the questionnaire with a total of 14 items seems to be suitable for measuring patient satisfaction with information. Additional research is needed to further verify the validity of the instrument. The questionnaire may help pharmaceutical-care providers to develop needs-based information strategies. The assessment of patient satisfaction can contribute to the outcome evaluation of pharmaceutical care. The fact that pharmacists are not yet being recognised by most patients as a source of information should support an intensified and more active offer of care by the pharmacist.

Keywords

Cancer care Competent patient Germany Information needs Information sources Patient satisfaction Pharmaceutical care Questionnaire Reliability Validation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hepler, CD, Strand, LM. 1990Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical careAm J Hosp Pharm4753343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. International Conference on Health Promotion. World Health Organization, 1986. www. who.dk/aboutwho/policy/20010827_2Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cassileth, BR, Zupkis, RV, Sutton-Smith, K, March, V. 1980Information and participation preferences among cancer patientsAnn Intern Med928326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Molen, B. 1999Relating information needs to the cancer experience:1Information as a key coping strategyEur J Cancer Care823844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dodd, MJ. 1983Self-care for side effects in cancer chemotherapy: an assessment of nursing interventions-Part IICancer Nurs6637PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Annunziata, MA, Foladore, S, Magri, MD, Crivellari, D, Feltrin, A, Bidoli, E.,  et al. 1998Does the information level of cancer patients correlate with quality of life? A prospective studyTumori84619623PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pohar, KJ, Taylor, SCM. 2000Ambulatory Patient Satisfaction with Cancer Treatment EducationJ Oncol Pharm Pract631Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aaronson, NK, Ahmedzai, S, Bergman, B, Bullinger, M, Cull, A, Duez, NJ.,  et al. 1993The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncologyJ Natl Cancer Inst8536576PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Streiner, DL, Norman, GR. 2000Health measurement scales- a practical guide to their development and useOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crocker, L, Algina, J. 1986Introduction to classical and modern test theoryHolt, Rinehart and WinstonNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lord, FM, Novick, MP.MA 1968Statistical theories of mental test scores.Addison-WesleyReadingGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Devellis, RF. 1991Scale developmentTheory and applications. Sage PublicationsNewbury Park CAGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pimentel, FL, Ferreira, JS, Vila, RM, Mesquita, NF, Maia-Goncalves, JP. 1999Quantity and quality of information desired by Portuguese cancer patientsSupport Care Cancer740712CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bonnet, V, Couvreur, C, Demachy, P, Kimmel, F, Milan, H, Noel, D,  et al. 2000Evaluating radiotherapy patients’ need for information: a study using a patient information bookletCancer Radiother4294307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hope, S, Williams, AS, Lunn, D. 2000Information provision to cancer patients: a practical example of identifying the need for changes in practice from the Dorset Cancer CentreEur J Cancer Care923842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luker, KA, Beaver, K, Leinster, SJ, Owens, RG. 1996Information needs and sources of information for women with breast cancer: a follow- up studyJ Adv Nurs2348795CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gustafson, DH, Taylor, JO, Thompson, S, Chesney, P. 1993Assessing the needs of breast cancer patients and their familiesQual Manag Health Care2617PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ried, LD, Wang, F, Young, H, Awiphan, R. 1999Patients’ satisfaction and their perception of the pharmacistJ Am Pharm Assoc3983542Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Janel G, Sing D, Grochocka A, Pfaff AB. Probleme im Versorgungsprozess aus der Sicht von Brustkrebspatientinnen und Ärzten. [in German] Forum 2000; 15(4): 24–7.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Häggmark, C, Bohman, L, Ilmoni-Brandt, K, Näslund, I, Sjödèn, PO, Nilsson, B. 2001Effects of information supply on satisfaction with information and quality of life on cancer patients receiving curative radiation therapyPatient Educ Couns451739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Liekweg
    • 1
  • Meike Eckhardt
    • 1
  • Suzanne C. Malfair Taylor
    • 2
  • Edgar Erdfelder
    • 3
  • Ulrich Jaehde
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical PharmacyRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.BC Cancer AgencyVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Department of Psychology IIIUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations