Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 175–181 | Cite as

Actual and Perceived Provision of Pharmaceutical Care in Danish Community Pharmacies: The Pharmacists’ Opinions

  • Charlotte Rossing
  • Ebba Holme Hansen
  • Janine Morgall Traulsen
  • Ines Krass
Article

Abstract

Objective: The study explores characteristics of community pharmacies with respect to implementing pharmaceutical care activities. The article addresses the provision of pharmaceutical care at reality level, perceived level and policy level. Method: A cross-sectional questionnaire was sent to all Danish community pharmacies to investigate the provision of pharmaceutical care (n=288). The respondents were pharmacists. Pharmaceutical care activities were operationalised by detecting and identifying medicine-related problems, setting goals to solve medicine-related problems, and documenting efforts to solve them. A non-respondent analysis was also performed. Main outcome measure: The identification of medicine-related problems (from self-report) was used as a proxy measure of pharmaceutical care activities and compared to pharmacies’ self-reported provision of pharmaceutical care. Results: The survey response rate was 75.7. The characteristics of pharmacies that detected medicine-related problems differed from those of pharmacies with only a perceived provision of pharmaceutical care. Pharmacies that actually detected medicine-related problems focused on external cooperation regarding their pharmacy activities. Conclusion: The profiles of the perceived providers of pharmaceutical care and the respondents that detected medicine- related problems were distinct, thus indicating two separate groups of pharmacies. Pharmaceutical care has only been implemented in Denmark to a limited extent. This may be explained in part by the top-down implementation strategy conceived by the proprietor organisation.

Keywords

Community pharmacy Denmark Implementation Medicine-related problems Pharmaceutical care Pharmacy profession Provider characteristics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hepler, CD, Strand, LM. 1990Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical careAm J Hosp Pharm4753343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Mil, JWF. 1999Pharmaceutical care – the future of pharmacyRijksuniversiteit GroningenGroningenISBN 90 9013367 4Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herborg, H, Soendergaard, B, Froekjaer, B, Fonnesbaek, L, Jorgensen, T, Hepler, CD,  et al. 2001Improving drug therapy for patients with asthma – part 1: Patients outcomesJ Am Pharm Ass4153950Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Herborg, H, Soendergaard, B, Jorgensen, T, Fonnesbaek, L, Hepler, CD, Holst, H,  et al. 2001Improving drug therapy for patients with asthma – part 2: Use of antiasthma MedicationJ Am Pharm Ass415519Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Danish Pharmaceutical Association, Proposal for minimum requirements within the major areas of the quality assurance document, Pharmacy Quality Assurance, 1998 [in Danish].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rossing, C, Hansen, EH, Krass, I. 2003The provision of pharmaceutical care in Denmark: a cross-sectional surveyJ Clin Pharm Ther283118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bell, HM, McElnay, JC, Hughes, CM, Woods, A. 1998A qualitative investigation of the attitudes and opinions of community pharmacists to pharmaceutical careJ Soc Adm Pharm1528494Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bell, HM, McElnay, JC, Hughes, CM, Woods, A. 1998Provision of pharmaceutical care by community pharmacists in Northern IrelandAm J Health Syst Pharm55200913PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Odedina, FT, Segal, R, Hepler, CD, Lipowski, E, Kimberlin, C. 1996Changing pharmacists’ practice patterns: pharmacists’ implementation of pharmaceutical care factorsJ Soc Adm Pharm137488Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Odedina, FT, Segal, R. 1996Behavioural pharmaceutical care scale for measuring pharmacists’ activitiesAm J Health Syst Pharm5385565PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Airaksinen, M, Vainio, K, Koistinen, J, Ahonen, R, Wallenius, S, Enlund, H. 1994Do the public and pharmacists share opinions about drug informationInt Pharm J816871Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Westerlund, T, Almarsdottir, AB, Melander, A. 1999Drug-related problems and pharmacy interventions in community practiceInt J Pharm Prac74050Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Westerlund, T, Almarsdottir, AB, Melander, A. 1999Factors influencing the detection rate of drug-related problems in community pharmacyPharm World Sci2124550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Westerlund, T, Marklund, BRG, Handl, WHA, Thunberg, ME, Allebeck, P. 2001Non-prescription drug-related problems and pharmacy interventionsAnn Pharmacother3513439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Engelsborg H, Fonnesbaek L, Herborg H, Soendergaard B. Pharmaceutical care in practice; The Danish College of Pharmacy Practice; 1999 [in Danish].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nielsen, T, Kreiner, S. 1999SPSS Introduction to data-management and statistical analysisJurist og Økonomforbundets ForlagDenmark[in Danish] ISBN 87 574 0645 6Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dalgaard, P. 2001Introduction to the statistical environment R for health science researchSpringer-VerlagNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Altman, DG. 1999Practical statistics for medical research1CRC Press, LLCFlorida1991. reprinted ISBN 0-412-27630-5Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bowling, A. 1997Research methods in healthRedwood BooksBuckingham UKISBN 0 335 19885 6Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    StatSoft, Inc. Electronic Statistics Textbook. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft, (2001). http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stathome.html. accessed 21 November 2002.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kielgast P. Opening speech at FIP Nice 2002. http://www. fip.org/pdf/2002KielgastOpeningSpeech.pdf accessed 2003-07–18.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Penna RP., Pharmacy: 1987A profession in transition or transitory profession?Am J Hosp Pharm4420539PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ivey, MF. 1993Shifting pharmacy paradigmAm J Hosp Pharm50186974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Almarsdottir, AB, Morgall, JM. 1991Technicians or patients’ advocates? – still a valid question (results of focus group discussions with pharmacists)Pharm World Sci2112731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Almarsdottir, AB, Morgall, JM, Grimsson, A. 2001Professional responsibility for patient care Is it possible to legislate pharmaceutical care?J Soc Adm Pharm184550Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    FIP statement of professional standards – pharmaceutical care. http://www.fip.org/pdf/pharmcare.pdf accessed 2003-07–18.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Larsen, JB. 2004Dynamics of pharmacy regulation in DenmarkPharm Hist219321994Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bernsten, C, Björkman, I, Caramona, M, Crealey, G, Froekjaer, B, Grundberger, E,  et al. 2001Improving the well-being of elderly patients via community pharmacy-based provision of pharmaceutical careDrugs Aging186377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zellmer, WA. 2001Role of pharmacy organisations in transforming the profession: the case of pharmaceutical careAm J Health Syst Pharm5820419Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charlotte Rossing
    • 1
  • Ebba Holme Hansen
    • 2
  • Janine Morgall Traulsen
    • 2
  • Ines Krass
    • 3
  1. 1.PharmakonHillerødDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Social Pharmacy and FKL: Research Centre for Quality in Medicine UseThe Danish University of Pharmaceutical SciencesCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Faculty of Pharmacy, Pharmacy BuildingUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations