Advertisement

Pharmaceutical Research

, 35:166 | Cite as

Chemotherapeutic Delivery from a Self-Assembling Peptide Nanofiber Hydrogel for the Management of Glioblastoma

  • Christina Karavasili
  • Emmanuel Panteris
  • Ioannis S. Vizirianakis
  • Sotirios Koutsopoulos
  • Dimitrios G. Fatouros
Research Paper
  • 212 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Localized chemotherapy has gained significant impetus for the management of malignant brain tumors. In the present study, we appraised the versatility of an in-situ gel forming self-assembling peptide, ac-(RADA)4-CONH2, as a biocompatible delivery depot of the chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin (DOX) and the anticancer agent curcumin (CUR), respectively.

Methods

The morphology and mechanical properties of ac-(RADA)4-CONH2 were assessed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and rheological studies. The in vitro drug release from ac-(RADA)4-CONH2 was monitored in phosphate-buffered saline pH 7.4. Distribution of the fluorescent actives within the peptide matrix was visualized with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The in vitro biological performance of the ac-(RADA)4-CONH2-DOX and ac-(RADA)4-CONH2-CUR was evaluated on the human glioblastoma U-87 MG cell line.

Results

SEM studies revealed that the ac-(RADA)4-CONH2 hydrogel contains an entangled nanofiber network. Rheology studies showed that the more hydrophobic CUR resulted in a stiffer hydrogel compared with ac-(RADA)4-CONH2 and ac-(RADA)4-CONH2-DOX, due to the interaction of CUR with the hydrophobic domains of the peptide nanofibers as confirmed by CLSM. In vitro release studies showed a complete DOX release from ac-(RADA)4-CONH2 within 4 days and a prolonged release for ac-(RADA)4-CONH2-CUR over 20 days. An increased cellular uptake and a higher cytotoxic effect were observed for ac-(RADA)4-CONH2-DOX, compared with DOX solution. Higher levels of early apoptosis were observed for the cells treated with the ac-(RADA)4-CONH2-CUR, compared to CUR solution.

Conclusions

The current findings highlight the potential utility of the in-situ depot forming ac-(RADA)4-CONH2 hydrogel for the local delivery of both water soluble and insoluble chemotherapeutic drugs.

Key words

cancer treatment curcumin doxorubicin drug delivery self-assembly 

Abbreviations

BBB

Blood brain barrier

CLSM

Confocal laser scanning microscopy

CUR

Curcumin

DOX

Doxorubicin

GBM

Glioblastoma multiforme

IC50

Half-maximal inhibitory concentration

PBS

Phosphate-buffered saline

SEM

Scanning electron microscopy

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DISCLOSURES

C.K. is supported by the Onassis Foundation with a PhD scholarship. We thank Orestis L. Katsamenis from μ-VIS X-ray Imaging Centre, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton for the SEM studies. We would like to thank Dr. A. Lazaridou from Department of Food Science and Technology, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece for her assistance in the rheology measurements. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author’s Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Bastiancich C, Danhier P, Préat V, Danhier F. Anticancer drug-loaded hydrogels as drug delivery systems for the local treatment of glioblastoma. J Control Release. 2016;243:29–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stupp R, Brada M, van den Bent MJ, Tonn JC, Pentheroudakis G. High-grade glioma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patel DM, Agarwal N, Tomei KL, Hansberry DR, Goldstein IM. Optimal timing of whole-brain radiation therapy following craniotomy for cerebral malignancies. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(2):412–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hervey-Jumper SL, Berger MS. Maximizing safe resection of low- and high-grade glioma. J Neuro-Oncol. 2016;130(2):269–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holland EC. Glioblastoma multiforme: the terminator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(12):6242–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jelsma R, Bucy PC. The treatment of glioblastoma multiforme of the brain. J Neurosurg. 1967;27(5):388–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reardon DA, Wucherpfennig KW, Freeman G, Chiocca EA, Wen PY, Curry WT Jr, et al. An update of vaccine therapy and other immunotherapeutic approaches for glioblastoma. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2014;12(6):597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karim R, Palazzo C, Evrard B, Piel G. Nanocarriers for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme: current state-of-the-art. J Control Release. 2016;227:23–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolinsky JB, Colson YL. Local drug delivery strategies for cancer treatment: gels, nanoparticles, polymeric films, rods and wafers. J Control Release. 2012;159(1):14–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chakroun RW, Zhang P, Lin R, Schiapparelli P, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Cui H. Nanotherapeutic systems for local treatment of brain tumors. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2017;10(1):e1479.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tian R, Chen J, Niu R. The development of low-molecular weight hydrogels for applications in cancer therapy. Nano. 2014;6(7):3474–82.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu L, Ding J. Injectable hydrogels as unique biomedical materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37(8):1473–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fourniols T, Randolph LD, Staub A, Vanvarenberg K, Leprince JG, Préat V, et al. Temozolomide-loaded photopolymerizable PEG-DMA-based hydrogel for the treatment of glioblastoma. J Control Release. 2015;210:95–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bastiancich C, Vanvarenberg K, Ucakar B, Pitorre M, Bastiat G, Lagarce F, et al. Lauroyl-gemcitabine-loaded lipid nanocapsule hydrogel for the treatment of glioblastoma. J Control Release. 2016;225:283–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tauro JR, Gemeinhart RA. Matrix metalloproteinase triggered delivery of cancer chemotherapy from hydrogel matrixes. Bioconjug Chem. 2005;16(5):1133–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meenach SA, Shapiro JM, Hilt JZ, Anderson KW. Characterization of PEG-iron oxide hydrogel nanocomposites for dual hyperthermia and paclitaxel delivery. J Biomater Sci Polym. 2013;24(9):1112–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsao CT, Kievit FM, Ravanpay A, Erickson AE, Jensen MC, Ellenbogen RG, et al. Thermoreversible poly(ethylene glycol)-g-chitosan hydrogel as a therapeutic T lymphocyte depot for localized glioblastoma immunotherapy. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15(7):2656–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jain A, Betancur M, Patel GD, Valmikinathan CM, Mukhatyar VJ, Vakharia A, et al. Guiding intracortical brain tumour cells to an extracortical cytotoxic hydrogel using aligned polymeric nanofibres. Nat Mater. 2014;13(3):308–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koutsopoulos S, Unsworth LD, Nagai Y, Zhang SG. Controlled release of functional proteins through designer self-assembling peptide nanofiber hydrogel scaffold. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(12):4623–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nagai Y, Unsworth LD, Koutsopoulos S, Zhang S. Slow release of molecules in self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffold. J Control Release. 2006;115(1):18–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thota CK, Yadav N, Chauhan VS. A novel highly stable and injectable hydrogel based on a conformationally restricted ultrashort peptide. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31167.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li X, Fu M, Wu J, Zhang CY, Deng X, Dhinakar A, et al. pH-sensitive peptide hydrogel for glucose-responsive insulin delivery. Acta Biomater. 2017;51:294–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kopesky PW, Byun S, Vanderploeg EJ, Kisiday JD, Frisbie DD, Grodzinsky AJ. Sustained delivery of bioactive TGF-beta 1 from self-assembling peptide hydrogels induces chondrogenesis of encapsulated bone marrow stromal cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(5):1275–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liebesny PH, Byun S, Hung HH, Pancoast JR, Mroszczyk KA, Young WT, et al. Growth factor-mediated migration of bone marrow progenitor cells for accelerated scaffold recruitment. Tissue Eng A. 2016;22(13–14):917–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koutsopoulos S. Self-assembling peptide nanofiber hydrogels in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: progress, design guidelines, and applications. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104(4):1002–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Acar H, Srivastava S, Chung EJ, Schnorenberg MR, Barrett JC, LaBelle JL, et al. Self-assembling peptide-based building blocks in medical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;110-111:65–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cormier AR, Pang X, immerman MI, Zhou HX, Paravastu AK. Molecular structure of RADA16-I designer self-assembling peptide nanofibers. ACS Nano. 2013;7:7562–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Momparler RL, Karon M, Siegel SE, Avila F. Effect of adriamycin on DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis in cell-free systems and intact cells. Cancer Res. 1976;36:2891–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sordillo LA, Sordillo PP, Helson L. Curcumin for the treatment of glioblastoma. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(8):6373–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cajot S, Van Butsele K, Paillard A, Passirani C, Garcion E, Benoit JP, et al. Smart nanocarriers for pH-triggered targeting and release of hydrophobic drugs. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(12):4215–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Manchun S, Dass CR, Sriamornsak P. Targeted therapy for cancer using pH-responsive nanocarrier systems. Life Sci. 2012;90(11–12):381–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ritger PL, Peppas NA. A simple equation for description of solute release ii. Fickian and anomalous release from swellable devices. J Control Release. 1987;5(1):37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang Y, Huo M, Zhou J, Zou A, Li W, Yao C, et al. DDSolver: an add-in program for modeling and comparison of drug dissolution profiles. AAPS J. 2010;12(3):263–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Altunbas A, Lee SJ, Rajasekaran SA, Schneider JP, Pochan DJ. Encapsulation of curcumin in self-assembling peptide hydrogels as injectable drug delivery vehicles. Biomaterials. 2011;32(25):5906–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liu J, Zhang L, Yang Z, Zhao X. Controlled release of paclitaxel from a self-assembling peptide hydrogel formed in situ and antitumor study in vitro. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:2143–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li I-C, Moore AN, Hartgerink JD. “Missing tooth” multidomain peptide nanofibers for delivery of small molecule drugs. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17:2087–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu J, Liu J, Xu H, Zhang Y, Chu L, Liu Q, et al. Novel tumor-targeting, self-assembling peptide nanofiber as a carrier for effective curcumin delivery. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:197–207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Koutsopoulos S, Zhang S. Long-term three-dimensional neural tissue cultures in functionalized self-assembling peptide hydrogels, Matrigel and Collagen I. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(2):5162–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cheng TY, Chen MH, Chang WH, Huang MY, Wang TW. Neural stem cells encapsulated in a functionalized self-assembling peptide hydrogel for brain tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2013;34(8):2005–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang X, Wang J, Guo L, Wang X, Chen H, Wang X, et al. Self-assembling peptide hydrogel scaffolds support stem cell-based hair follicle regeneration. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2016;12(7):2115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Koutsopoulos S, Zhang S. Two-layered injectable self-assembling peptide scaffold hydrogels for long-term sustained release of human antibodies. J Control Release. 2012;160(3):451–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhou A, Chen S, He B, Zhao W, Chen X. Controlled release of TGF-beta 1 from RADA self-assembling peptide hydrogel scaffolds. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016;10:3043–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Karavasili C, Komnenou A, Katsamenis OL, Charalampidou G, Kofidou E, Andreadis D, et al. Self-assembling peptide nanofiber hydrogels for controlled ocular delivery of timolol maleate. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017;3(12):3386–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brosseau N, Andreev E, Ramotar D. Complementation of the yeast model system reveals that caenorhabditis elegans OCT-1 is a functional transporter of anthracyclines. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133182.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kunwar A, Barik A, Mishra B, Rathinasamy K, Pandey R, Priyadarsini KI. Quantitative cellular uptake, localization and cytotoxicity of curcumin in normal and tumor cells. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2008;1780(4):673–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sun J, Bi C, Chan HM, Sun S, Zhang Q, Zheng Y. Curcumin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles have prolonged in vitro antitumour activity, cellular uptake and improved in vivo bioavailability. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;111:367–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina Karavasili
    • 1
  • Emmanuel Panteris
    • 2
  • Ioannis S. Vizirianakis
    • 3
  • Sotirios Koutsopoulos
    • 4
  • Dimitrios G. Fatouros
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical TechnologyAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Department of Botany, School of BiologyAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  3. 3.School of Pharmacy, Laboratory of PharmacologyAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  4. 4.Center for Biomedical EngineeringMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations