Understanding Biorelevant Drug Release from a Novel Thermoplastic Capsule by Considering Microstructural Formulation Changes During Hydration
To study the biorelevant drug release from novel starch-based polyvinyl alcohol capsules (S-PVA-C). The effect of the shell material is studied by considering microstructural formulation changes during hydration.
Two different self-emulsifying systems containing either fenofibrate or probucol were filled in S-PVA-C, as well as capsules of gelatin (SGC) and starch (VegaGels®). Release analysis employed a BioDis® apparatus, while disintegration was studied by texture analysis. For microstructural analysis we used small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS).
S-PVA-C opened only partially in biorelevant media compared to completely opened SGC and VegaGels®. In case of the fenofibrate formulation, this opening mechanism caused only a short lag time, while the probucol formulation in S-PVA-C resulted in a sustained release. The latter formulation demonstrated much higher viscosity upon hydration compared to the fenofibrate system. Such a rheological effect on drug release was barely noted for SGC or VegaGels® and SAXS revealed differences in the hydrated microstructure.
Even though S-PVA-C are highly attractive for encapsulation of rather hydrophilic formulations, some care is needed regarding an immediate release form. The type of formulation hydration must be considered for adequate selection of the capsule material.
KEY WORDSbiorelevant release controlled hydration disintegration lipid-based formulation thermoplastic capsule
- 1.Reich G. Formulation and physical properties of soft capsules. In: Podczeck F, Jones BE, editors. Pharmaceutical capsules. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2004. p. 201–12.Google Scholar
- 4.Dressman J, Schamp K, Beltz K, Alsenz J. Characterizing release from lipid-based formulations. In: Hauss DJ, editor. Oral lipid-based formulations: enhancing the bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs. New York: Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.; 2007. p. 241–56.Google Scholar
- 5.Borst I, Ugwu S, Beckett AH. New and extended applications for USP drug release apparatus 3. Dissolution Technol. 1997;4(1):11–18.Google Scholar
- 10.Lopez-Montilla JC, Herrera-Morales PE, Pandey S, Shah DO. Spontaneous emulsification: mechanisms, physicochemical aspects, modeling and applications. J Dispersion Sci Techn. 2002;23(1–3):219–68.Google Scholar
- 11.Wakerly MG, Pouton CW, Meakin BJ. Evaluation of the self-emulsifying performance of a non-ionic surfactant-vegetable oil mixture. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1987;39:6P.Google Scholar
- 15.Biradar SV, Dhumal RS, Paradkar A. Rheological investigation of self-emulsification process: effect of co-surfactant. J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci. 2009;12(2):164–74.Google Scholar
- 20.Klein S. Dissolution test methods for modified release dosage forms, Doctoral thesis. Frankfurt am Main: Shaker-Verlag; 2005.Google Scholar
- 23.Groves MJ. Rheological characterization of self-emulsifying oil/surfactant systems. Acta Pharm Suecica. 1976;13:353–60.Google Scholar
- 26.The United States Pharmacopeia & The National Formulary. The Official Compendia of Standards, USP 35-NF30 2012. Pharmacopoeial Convention Inc., 2012.Google Scholar