Current and Future Drug Targets in Weight Management
- 2.5k Downloads
Obesity will continue to be one of the leading causes of chronic disease unless the ongoing rise in the prevalence of this condition is reversed. Accumulating morbidity figures and a shortage of effective drugs have generated substantial research activity with several molecular targets being investigated. However, pharmacological modulation of body weight is extremely complex, since it is essentially a battle against one of the strongest human instincts and highly efficient mechanisms of energy uptake and storage. This review provides an overview of the different molecular strategies intended to lower body weight or adipose tissue mass. Weight-loss drugs in development include molecules intended to reduce the absorption of lipids from the GI tract, various ways to limit food intake, and compounds that increase energy expenditure or reduce adipose tissue size. A number of new preparations, including combinations of the existing drugs topiramate plus phentermine, bupropion plus naltrexone, and the selective 5-HT2C agonist lorcaserin have recently been filed for approval. Behind these leading candidates are several other potentially promising compounds and combinations currently undergoing phase II and III testing. Some interesting targets further on the horizon are also discussed.
KEY WORDSenergy metabolism food-intake obesity complications satiety hormones weight management
11-β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1
brown adipose tissue
body mass index
cannabinoid receptor type 1
central nervous system
dipeptidyl peptidase IV
glucagon-like peptide 1
microsomal triglyceride transfer protein
- PPAR γ
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ
(low affinity) sodium-dependent glucose co-transporter
- TRPV type 1
transient receptor potential cation channel V type 1
INTRODUCTION—HEALTH RISKS OF BODY FAT
Obesity has become a serious and worldwide public health problem with important consequences for healthcare costs (1, 2, 3). The common way to classify obesity is by body mass index (BMI), which is calculated as weight in kg/height in meters squared. Persons with a BMI over 25 are called overweight, whereas a BMI of over 30 represents obesity. Both classifications are major risk factors for a cluster of health complications often referred to as the metabolic syndrome (1,4,5). These include (pre-)diabetes type 2, hypertension and other cardiovascular complications. In addition, obesity leads to an elevated risk for developing other diseases, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, osteoarthritis, sleep apnea, cognitive decline and certain forms of cancer (6). Although BMI remains a useful general indicator for health risk, particularly at a population level, it has become clear that health complications are largely dependent on the localization and activity of the different fat depots. For any given amount of total body fat, those individuals with a predominant excess of intra-abdominal or visceral adipose tissue are at substantially higher risk of becoming insulin resistant or getting any of the other features of the metabolic syndrome (4,7,8). Therefore, waist circumference or waist/hip ratio is often a better indicator than BMI (9,10). Furthermore, there remains a risk of under diagnosis, since persons who look “thin outside” but have relatively much fat “hidden” within organs, such as muscles, heart and liver (“fat inside”), bear considerable health risks (11,12). Within fat tissue, the adipocyte phenotypes and infiltration of immune cells are considered pivotal determinants for the development of metabolic complications (13,14). It has been shown that adipose tissue can initiate and maintain a low-grade inflammatory process, which in turn activates inflammatory responses in liver and other organs. Another important risk factor is the presence of high levels of free fatty acids in plasma (15,16).
General Pharmacological Strategies to Combat Overweight or Complications of Adiposity
• Reducing energy absorption from the GI tract or peripheral tissues
• Decreasing food consumption by increasing satiety or satiation, reducing appetite, increasing feelings of reward, etc.
• Reducing body fat by stimulating energy expenditure or inhibiting energy supply of adipose tissue
• Reducing inflammatory activity of adipose tissues
• Modulating body fat distribution, energy fluxes or mimicking physical exercise
Basically, the first three categories primarily target body weight, which is the focus of this review. However, there is not always a sharp division between reduction of weight or reduction of complications as primary goal, while combining these objectives also offers advantages. Specifically modulating metabolic or immunological processes associated with adiposity is considered potentially effective to reduce health complications. An interesting example is the approach to reduce the pro-inflammatory state in overweight and obese persons using anti-inflammatory compounds such as salsalate (17, 18, 19). In addition, strategies aiming to modulate body fat distribution and not primarily total body fat are being investigated. This is based on the observation that persons with a predominant android (“apple”) body shape are at higher risk for cardiovascular disease than persons having a more gynaeoid (“pear”) body shape. Obviously, genetic and hormonal factors play a role (20,21). Furthermore, fat cell size may be of importance (22). Finally, the discovery that regular physical exercise significantly reduces health risks even in the absence of direct weight reduction (1,23, 24, 25) has stimulated the research on an “exercise pill” (24,26, 27, 28).
WEIGHT MANAGEMENT DRUGS—ISSUES AND NEEDS
While keeping in mind that health risks are not simply determined by body weight or even total body fat mass, losing weight is still commonly regarded as effective in overweight people who are developing symptoms of the (pre-)metabolic syndrome. Ideally, weight management should be based on lifestyle modification, including the reduction of caloric intake, increased activity, and physical exercise. Unfortunately, long-term effects of diet or exercise on weight are often disappointing. The desire to eat is one of the strongest instincts, and humans have developed powerful mechanisms to guard against starvation during periods of food scarcity. Our brains do not only generate sensations of hunger as a result of direct metabolic stimulation. Instead, human eating behavior is a combination of liking (hedonic impact), wanting (incentive motivation), and learning (associations and predictions) (29, 30, 31). Non-homeostatic overeating is regulated by central dopaminergic, serotonergic, opioid and cannabinoid systems that show many interconnections and overlaps with other important regulatory pathways (32,33). As a result, the development of effective drugs with acceptable side-effects can be very cumbersome. With respect to durable weight reduction, bariatric surgery is the most effective long-term treatment for severe obesity with the greatest chances for amelioration and even resolution of obesity-associated complications, including diabetes (34,35). However, depending on the technique used, it is not without surgical risks or metabolic complications (35) and involves high costs. Pharmacological options are to be considered as an adjunct to dietary measures and physical exercise, and long-term weight management by drug treatment alone does not seem realistic at present. However, there will be situations where the use of drugs or possibly even vaccines to reduce weight is medically rational and justified. Criteria for FDA approval of anti-obesity drugs prescribe that 35% of treated persons must lose at least 5% of their body weight, and that group should include at least twice as many individuals as the number of patients who achieve a similar weight loss on placebo. Alternatively, the therapy must result in at least 5% placebo-corrected weight loss. On a population level, such figures will contribute to a lower incidence of complications. The history of development and application of weight loss drugs has shown to be troublesome and characterized by many failures and withdrawals. The most recent example of this occurred in January 2010, when subitramine was suspended from the European market by EMA (www.ema.europe.eu) because of potential cardiovascular risks in certain patients. The compound has remained available in the US, but the FDA issued a safety notification and requested a new contraindication stating that sibutramine should not be used in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease. Another recent case was the suspension of the cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) inverse agonist rimonabant from the EU market in October 2008. At that time, FDA had not given approval for the compound because of doubts regarding its CNS risk-benefit profile. While preparing this review (October 2010) the FDA raised serious concerns on the new applications for lorcaserin and the new phentermine/topiramate combination. In 1997, fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine, particularly popular with phentermine in fen-phen combinations, were withdrawn after reports of negative effects on heart valves and primary pulmonary hypertension (36). The historical list of failures and withdrawals further continues with thyroid preparations, ephedrine, dinitrophenol, etc. Despite many efforts to bring new compounds to the market, the intestinal lipase inhibitor orlistat has remained the only compound that is currently approved both in the US and in Europe. However, some new drugs appear to be close to approval, and it is obvious that the pharmacology of weight management remains a highly challenging area for industry and academia. It also represents a multi-billion-dollar market, and several research groups are heavily engaged in finding new targets and molecules. The history of discovery of anti-obesity drugs is also characterized by much serendipity. As described further, some of the most advanced preparations currently in the pipeline are based on compounds or drug targets that were originally found for other indications.
STRATEGIES TO REDUCE ENERGY (RE-)ABSORPTION
Reducing the uptake of energy-rich molecules from the GI tract, preferably by locally acting compounds, could be an attractive approach, since this would minimize the risks of systemic side-effects. Indeed, the lipase inhibitor orlistat belongs to the very few compounds having survived so far. This is also a suggested mechanism of action of many food supplements advertised for weight management. Several of these preparations claim to bind fat in the GI tract, including chitosan, glucomannan, psyllium seeds, etc. However, there seems to be little evidence for sustained efficacy in humans of these products (37). A new lipase inhibitor, cetilistat, is now in an advanced stage of development. In addition, a number of new targets are evolving, including inhibitors of Microsomal Triglyceride transfer Protein (MTP) and Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase (DGAT). A related but different category comprises the inhibitors of low-affinity sodium-dependent glucose co-transporters (SGLT2). Acting by blocking glucose re-absorption in the kidneys and originally developed for diabetes, some are now in trials for obesity. Farther on the horizon are strategies aiming to modulate GI metabolism.
Inhibitors of Pancreatic Lipase
Cetilistat (= ATL-962, Fig. 2) is a newly developed lipase inhibitor which has recently entered phase III clinical testing. It has been suggested that the compound is equally effective as orlistat while producing fewer GI side effects (40). However, more long-term studies on the side effects and efficacy of cetilistat are required in order to confirm this and to answer the question whether GI side effects, such as steatorrhoea, are inevitably connected to the mechanism of action of this class. Another lipase inhibitor, called GT 389-255, was under development by Peptimmune, under a license from Genzyme. It was designed as a combination of an (undisclosed) lipase inhibitor and a polymer aiming to bind undigested triglycerides. This should allow increased fat excretion without the side effects of conventional lipase inhibitors. However, the development seems to be stalled or stopped, as there were no further clinical studies reported since the phase I trials conducted in 2004.
Inhibitors of Intestinal Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein (MTP)
DGAT1 and MGAT Inhibitors
Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase (DGAT; EC 188.8.131.52) catalyzes the last step of triacylgycerol synthesis. See (43) and (44) for reviews. DGAT is expressed in different tissues, including liver and white adipose tissue. Two isozymes of DGAT, DGAT1 and DGAT2, have been described so far (http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot). Increased DGAT2 activity has a role in steatosis, while DGAT1 plays a role in VLDL assembly. Increased plasma VLDL concentrations may promote obesity; thus, DGAT1 is considered a potential therapeutic target for obesity control. Pfizer recently (2010) finalized a phase I trial (Clintrial.gov NCT01064492) with their DGAT1 inhibitor PF 04620110 that is initially being developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The company anticipates that the compound will have anti-diabetic effects through inhibition of intestinal triglyceride absorption and will potentially cause weight loss. AstraZeneca (www.astrazeneca.com) also report a DGAT1 inhibitor in development for diabetes/obesity in their July 2010 pipeline overview (45).
MGAT (MOGT 2; 2-acylglycerol O-acyltransferase 2; EC 184.108.40.206) catalyzes the formation of diacylglycerol from 2-monoacylglycerol and fatty acyl-CoA. It belongs to the diacylglycerol acyltransferase family (43,44). It is highly expressed in liver, small intestine, colon, stomach and kidney and plays a central role in absorption of dietary fat in the small intestine by catalyzing the re-synthesis of triacylglycerol in enterocytes. It is considered a potential target for weight loss, although concern has been raised because of the theoretical accumulation of fatty acids and monoacylglycerol in enterocytes. Probably due to this, MGAT gets less attention compared to SGAT, and its future as drug target seems uncertain.
Inhibitors of Low-Affinity Sodium-Dependent Glucose Co-transporters (SGLT2)
Compared to the previous categories discussed, this target represents a different potential approach for weight loss. The sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) is a low-affinity transport system that is specifically expressed in the kidney and plays an important role in renal glucose re-absorption in the proximal tubule. Competitive inhibition of SGLT2, leading to enhanced glucose and energy loss through the urine, was initially regarded a promising new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (see (46) for a recent review). However, some compounds are now also undergoing investigation for their potential effect on body weight. These include serglifozin (GSK-869682; clintrials.gov NCT00297180), canaglifozin (JNJ-28431754; clintrials.gov NCT00650806) and remogliflozin etabonate (GSK- 189075; clintrials.gov NCT00494767). Johnson and Johnson plan to file their canaglifozine before 2013 (47).
Intestinal Microbiota as Future Target for Weight Management?
A potential future strategy for weight loss that is currently receiving increasing attention is selective modulation of the intestinal micro flora. Some years ago, Gordon and co-workers (48,49) discovered that intestinal bacteria appear to have an important effect on body weight. In addition, certain antibiotics can increase body weight in rats and mice, and human data indicate that the combination of vancomycin plus gentamycin is accompanied by a significant weight gain (50). Several mechanisms have been suggested, including the phenomenon of “energy harvesting” by the micro flora, production of specific short-chain fatty acids interacting with certain receptors including GPR41 and GPR43 (51), and changes in the pro-/anti-inflammatory balance in the gut.
TARGETS FOR REDUCING APPETITE OR INDUCING SATIETY OR SATIATION
Pharmacological modulation of human eating behavior has proven to be extremely complex. People do not only eat to satisfy their hunger or appetite, but also for many other reasons, including sensory stimulation, sensory hedonics, in response to stress, for social interaction, against boredom, etc. (29, 30, 31,52,53). Several pathways are involved in regulating eating behavior with many redundant and compensation mechanisms in place. Before and during eating, sensory effects are generated through the taste, smell, temperature and texture of food. Cognitive effects play a role in the beliefs about the properties of the foods being eaten and their effects. Post-ingestive factors include the effects of gastric distension, rate of gastric emptying, release of intestinal hormones into the circulation and neural signaling via the Nervus vagus (see (54) for review). Signals and hormones originating from the GI tract are commonly called satiety signals and satiety hormones, respectively. They include the pancreatic hormone glucagon, cholecystokinin (CCK), GLP-1, PYY, etc. It should be noted that the term satiety hormones may be somewhat confusing, since most of them promote a process called satiation, which serves as trigger of meal termination. Meal termination is also stimulated by circulating levels of glucose, amino acids and lipids, which are directly sensed by the brain or through peripheral receptors (55). By contrast, the term satiety is typically used to describe processes that inhibit further eating during postprandial periods, determining meal frequency. Blood glucose concentration activates gluco-receptors in the hypothalamus, either acting to up-regulate hunger when blood glucose levels fall or up-regulate satiety when glucose concentrations rise. In the longer term, deposition of fat may lead to control of appetite by neuronal and hormonal signals via leptin. Within the central nervous system, systems involved in eating behavior share many mediators and pathways involved in, for example, the regulation of metabolism and mood state. This partly explains why several compounds with a relatively broad spectrum of activities have shown unacceptable side effects in the past. Vice versa, there are also several CNS drugs developed for other indications that show effects on eating behavior.
Modulation of nutrient sensing within the GI tract or through interference with signals transmitted to the brain or peripheral organs.
Modulation of signal processing within the CNS, for example by interfering with neurotransmitter concentrations or activity.
NUTRIENT SENSING WITHIN THE GI TRACT AND SIGNALLING TO THE BRAIN
Generation of Satiety Signals in the GI Tract
According to most of the present views, endocrine biochemical signals are not regarded as major drivers for meal onset. So far, the only exception seems to be ghrelin, which is an orexigenic (stimulating eating) peptide hormone, surging just before meals and suppressed by ingested nutrients (54,56). By contrast, satiation is a process that is delicately regulated by various signals originating from the stomach and gut. Along the GI tract, several receptor types are present that respond to nutrients and their immediate breakdown products, such as amino acids, small peptides, fatty acids or carbohydrates (51). Increasing evidence suggests that metabolites formed by bacteria or host cells within the GI tract are also involved in this sensing process (51). Receptors are located on so-called entero-endocrine cells (EECs) and on afferent nerve terminals (see also Fig. 1). By their shape and location, these entero-endocrine cells are well equipped to sense chemical structures in the lumen and to pass their information to small blood vessel and nerve terminals. Their apical side is in contact with the luminal contents, and their basolateral side is in contact with the vasculature of the lamina propria, neural cells, and with distant enterocytes. Remarkably, several entero-endocrine cell types throughout the gut also express taste receptors, including T1R2/3 sweet taste receptors, T2R-family bitter receptors, and the taste-specific G protein Gα-gustducin (57,58). An important finding has been that taste-like nutrient sensing is necessary for normal GLP-1 secretion. Expression of sweet taste receptors was also found to be decreased in diabetic subjects with elevated blood glucose concentration (58). In addition, endocannabinoids induce sweet taste (59). This suggests that intestinal “taste” signaling is under dynamic metabolic and luminal control. Nutrient signaling to the brain is a combination of endocrine and neural processes. Vagal afferent nerve fibers are forming the enteric nervous system, which communicates to the brain via the N. Vagus. Nerve terminals in the mucosa contain specific receptors that recognize satiation peptides and nutrient-derived mediators (60).
Upon stimulation, several satiation-inducing peptides are being released by entero-endocrine cells, including cholecystokinin (CCK), bombesin, glucagon, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), GLP-2, apolipoprotein A-IV, amylin, somatostatin, enterostatin, and peptide YY (PYY). Increasing evidence suggests that the development of satiation cannot be simply attributed to stimulation of specific receptors at defined locations. Instead, digestion, passage through the GI tract and satiation are acting in a cascade of events. Sensing and feedback occur via signals from multiple sites in the GI system, including the stomach, proximal small intestine, distal small intestine, colon, and pancreas (52,54).
Satiation signals also interact with adiposity signals, in which leptin plays an important role. The central integration and control occurs by the hypothalamus, which is continuously informed about the nutritional, energetic and environmental status of the body. This complexity in signaling and cross-talk has often limited the clinical result of a single target drug, i.e. a molecule specifically acting on one receptor.
Intestinal, Pancreatic and Peripheral Receptors and Local Feed-Back Mechanisms as Potential Targets for Satiation
Considering the abundance and diversity of nutrient-sensing receptors, it is understandable that they are receiving considerable interest as potential targets for satiety induction. This is also obvious from the high activity in the patent literature. Many GI receptors still have an orphan receptor status, but considerable progress is being made with their de-orphanization and characterization. The gut contains several types of receptors, for example G-protein gustducin and G-protein-coupled receptors (including GPR119, 93, 55,120 and 40), TRPV type 1, and various other types including melanocortin, opioid and PPAR (51,58,61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66). So far, intensive research for pharmacological ligands that possess significant effects on body weight has not led to important breakthroughs. An interesting exception to this seems to be the G-protein-coupled receptor GPR 119. Initially, GPR119 was considered a potential new endocannabinoid receptor because of structural similarity and overlapping ligand selectively.
The Endocannabinoid System: Not a Lost Target
Compounds Interfering with Signaling Pathways to the Brain
Some Examples of Pharmacological Interventions Via Gut Hormone Signaling
Nasal formulations, development discontinued for the time being
PP analogues/Y4 agonists
TM-30339, obinepitide (dual-analogue of PYY3-36 and PP)
Analogues (in combinations)
Amylin is a peptide of 37 amino acids which is co-released with insulin by the pancreas (56,87). Its primary sites of action are thought to be located in the brainstem. Amylin analogues were originally developed for therapeutic use in diabetes but were also shown to cause weight loss, for example in obese patients with type 2 diabetes (88). The use of the endogenous peptide might increase the risk for the formation of amyloid fibrils (56). However, the analogue pramlintide (Symlin®, Pubchem CID 16132446), developed by Amylin Pharmaceuticals, does not contain the sequence that is considered responsible for this effect. Pramlintide is already available in the US as an injectable antihyperglycemic drug for diabetic patients who also use insulin. An interesting preparation which is currently in development is the combination of pramlintide with metreleptin (89). Metreleptin is a synthetic analogue of leptin. Normally, sensitivity to leptin is reduced in obesity, which limits its therapeutic potential. However, pramlintide was found to inhibit this process. In a 20-week trial, the combination induced a weight loss of 12.7 ± 0.9% (11.5 ± 0.9 kg) in obese persons (89). Another second-generation amylin analogue in development was davalintide (30). However, recently, Amylin Pharmaceuticals and Takeda (Japan) announced they were giving priority to the pramlintide/metreleptin combination and discontinuing development of davalintide. Phase II studies demonstrated that the weight-loss efficacy and tolerability profile of davalintide was not better than that of pramlintide and was inferior to that of the pramlintide/metreleptin combination (90).
PYY (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36) is a 36-amino-acid polypeptide synthesized by entero-endocrine cells of the L-type, mainly in the distal gut. The main circulating form of the hormone is PYY(3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36), which is formed after partial cleavage of PYY(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36) by dipeptidyl peptidase IV (56). PYY is considered to be a principal mediator of the ‘ileal brake’ reflex, which is a feedback mechanism that slows gastric emptying and intestinal transit in response to nutrients (fat, protein, and carbohydrates) arriving in the distal small intestine. The effects of PYY3-36 are mediated via the Y2-receptor, which is found throughout the central nervous system, in the nodose ganglion, and on Vagal afferents. It has also been suggested that weight loss induced by PYY3-36 occurs in part by modulating energy expenditure and fuel partitioning (56). Following the discovery of Batterham et al. (91) that peripheral administration of PYY3-36 can cause a reduction of food intake in rodents and in obese and normal-weight humans, other studies confirmed the anorectic action of PYY3-36. However, in their review, Boggiano et al. (92) take a very skeptical position on the potential of PYY3-36-based therapies in practice. A phase II trial in 2008 with a PYY3-36 nasal spray showed encouraging results (56). Nevertheless, the development of that formulation was stopped, as the results did not meet the primary endpoints. At present, there appears to be little activity with PYY-based approaches (30).
Pancreatic Polypeptide Analogues
Pancreatic polypeptide (PP) is a 36-amino-acid peptide categorized in the same family as PYY. However, in contrast to PYY, it is mainly secreted by the pancreas and, to a lesser extent, by the colon (56). Plasma PP concentrations rise in a biphasic manner following nutrient ingestion. This increase is proportional to the caloric load of the meal with concentrations remaining elevated up to 6 h after a meal. This suggests that PP exerts its effects on feeding mainly by inducing satiety. PP has highest affinity for Y4-receptors in brainstem and hypothalamus, followed by Y1- and Y5- receptors. Several studies demonstrate that PP can reduce food intake. Danish 7TM Pharma has developed TM-30339, a synthetic analogue of PP and a selective Y4-receptor agonist. The compound demonstrated weight loss in diet-induced obese mice. According to the company, the compound showed good safety and tolerability data and is now in phase II. However, indications have apparently shifted to gastrointestinal disorders, including mucositis, malabsorphtion, ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease and short bowel syndrome (93). The same company has also developed the dual PP and PYY (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36) analogue obinepitide (http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P01298), with agonist activity both for the Y2 and Y4 receptor (94). According to 7TM Pharma, the compound had greater weight-loss-inducing effects in diet-induced obese mice than PYY3-36. The compound is now in phase I/II, and once-a-day subcutaneous administration in obese subjects inhibited food intake at a statistically significant level up to 9 h after dosing.
Among the gut hormones, GLP-1 is currently the most promising and advanced target for pharmacological weight management. Natural GLP-1 is synthesized by intestinal L-cells and subsequently cleaved to its active fragments GLP-17–37 and GLP-17–36 amide, the latter being the major circulating form. GLP-1 is rapidly inactivated by dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV), leading to an elimination half-life of only 1–2 min. The peptide acts on the GLP-1 receptor, which is widely expressed throughout the CNS and peripheral tissues (56). GLP-1 receptors in peripheral tissues, including the stomach, may also be important in meal termination and possibly satiety. Administration of GLP-1 causes a dose-dependent reduction of food intake in experimental animals and in both lean and obese humans. Two main strategies are being followed to combat the extremely short half-life of native GLP-1. The first is by producing more stable GLP-1 analogues; the second is by inhibiting DPP IV, which is catalyzing the GLP-1 breakdown. For weight management, stable GLP-1 has so far produced the best results. A first breakthrough was the discovery of the natural GLP-1 analogue exendin-4 in the venom of a lizard called Gila monster. Based on this molecule, Amylin Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly developed exenatide (Byetta®), which is already on the market as an adjunct to current diabetes therapies. The observation that the drug not only improved glycemic control, but also caused a reduction in body weight, stimulated further research in this direction. An unpleasant side effect of Exenatide is nausea, in particular during the initial phase of treatment. Furthermore, patients can develop antibodies to the drug, which sometimes leads to reduced efficacy. Exenatide needs to be administered twice daily by subcutaneous injection, which is also a disadvantage. To overcome this, a once-weekly injection preparation named exenatide LAR (Amylin/Lilly/Alkermes) is currently under development. Phase III trial results have demonstrated good blood sugar control and weight loss, especially in patients for whom metformin or sulphonylureas are not effective (95). As expected, exenatide LAR has a side-effect profile similar to Byetta®. A promising alternative is liraglutide (Novo Nordisk), a GLP-1 analogue with 97% similarity to human GLP-17–37 (96). Due to the addition of a side chain, liraglutide binds to albumin, leading to a half-life of about 13 hours. Liraglutide has already been approved for use in diabetes. Recently, the NN8022-1807 Study Group (96) reported the results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled 20-week trial, with open-label orlistat comparator in 19 sites across Europe. In total, 564 non-diabetic individuals with a BMI between 30 and 40 kg/m2 participated. Mean weight loss with the different doses of liraglutide was between 4.8 and 7.2 kg, compared to 2.8 kg with placebo and 4.1 kg with orlistat. More individuals (76%, n = 70) lost more than 5% weight with liraglutide 3.0 mg than with placebo (30%, n = 29) or orlistat (44%, n = 42). Liraglutide also showed beneficial effects on blood pressure and pre-diabetes symptoms. Although nausea and vomiting occurred at higher frequency in the liraglutide groups, these side effects were considered transient and rarely led to discontinuation of treatment. As liraglutide still needs to be administered by injection, Novo is developing a long-acting oral GLP-1 analog (NN9924) that utilizes sodium N-[8-(2-hydroxybenzoyl) amino] caprylate (SNAC) carrier technology (97). A phase I trial was started early 2010.
OXM consists of 37 amino acids of which 29 are in common with GLP-1. Levels peak at 30 min and in proportion to caloric intake, remaining elevated for several hours (56). Although OXM has a 50-fold lower affinity for binding at the GLP-1 receptor, it has an equal potency for inhibiting food intake. Studies have shown that OXM reduces food intake and causes reduced weight gain in rodents. Acute OXM administration reduced food intake in lean volunteers, and chronic OXM subcutaneous injections in obese individuals induced an average weight loss of 2.3 kg after 4 weeks, compared to 0.5 kg in the control group (56). Despite this, only a small number of development projects appear to be in an advanced stage. Thiakis Limited (London, UK) started in March 2008 investigating the potential of their OXM analogue, TKS1225. Following the take-over of Thiakis by Wyeth in December 2008, which was in turn acquired by Pfizer in 2010, the present status of this molecule is unknown.
Cholecystokinin-1 (CCK) Agonists
CCK is secreted by I-cells in the proximal part of the small intestine. The hormone is formed by post-translational cleavage of the pre-pro-CCK polypeptide, which undergoes further proteolysis to a cocktail of active peptides with varying numbers of amino acids (see (98) for review). Following nutrient ingestion, circulating CCK levels start to increase bi-phasically at 15 min, reaching a peak at around 25 min, and remain elevated for approximately 3 h (56). Presently, there are two G-protein-coupled CCK receptors known. CCK-1 receptors are mainly present in the gastrointestinal tract, myenteric plexus and Vagal afferents, while CCK-2 receptors are predominantly expressed in the brain. It is widely accepted that CCK-induced satiation is largely mediated by the CCK-1 receptors (56). Although administration of CCK has shown to cause a reduction of food intake, its value for anti-obesity therapy has proven to be limited so far. It appears that CCK is more important in satiation than satiety, which could lead to compensation through increasing meal frequency. GSK has stopped the development of their compound GI 181771 after phase II clinical trials failed to show any significant weight loss (99). A limitation of that study might have been that participants were allowed to eat ad libitum and might have compensated their energy intake by increasing meal frequency. At the end of 2008, Pfizer also discontinued development of a CCK agonist (CE-326597) after phase II.
Blocking Ghrelin Activity
In contrast to the previously described gut hormones, ghrelin stimulates eating. Ghrelin is a 28-amino-acid polypeptide released from the gastric oxyntic cells. Its plasma levels show a marked rise shortly before the start of a meal (100). The peptide increases food intake both in rodents and humans. Ghrelin has been shown to act on the growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1A (GHS-R1a), which is expressed in several brain areas (101). In order to bind, ghrelin needs to be bio-activated through acylation with a medium-chain fatty acid. The enzyme involved, gastric O-acyltransferase (GOAT), has also attracted interest as a potential target to modulate ghrelin activity (102). Some discussion is remaining on the potential role of non-acylated ghrelin (56). Recent studies suggest that ghrelin activates reward-seeking circuits and increases the incentive value of palatable foods in particular (101). To modulate ghrelin effects, blocking the receptor using small-molecule antagonists seems an interesting option. Indeed, several GHS-R1a blockers were synthesized and characterized (for example (103,104)). However, no molecules appear to have reached the clinical phase to date. Alternative strategies are targeting ghrelin itself by ghrelin RNA aptamers (so-called Spiegelmers, including NOX-B11) developed by Berlin-based company NOXXON Pharma AG (105) or by an anti-ghrelin vaccine (106). The aptamer strategy was licensed to Pfizer and has not yet reached clinical testing. Although ghrelin vaccination has shown promising results in animals (106), human tests have not given suitable results so far.
Leptin is not a gut hormone but secreted by adipose tissue. It has been shown to act as both a short- and long-term regulator of energy balance and to signal in the arcuate nucleus, where it inhibits NPY/AgRP signaling and stimulates POMC/CART signaling. After the discovery of leptin, expectations were high regarding its potential to reduce appetite. However, early clinical trials of leptin therapy for the treatment of obesity failed because the majority of obese patients exhibit leptin resistance. Recently, though, leptin has reemerged as a targeted antiobesity therapeutic in combination with the amylin analogue pramlintide (see section on amylin analogues).
DRUGS ACTING ON NEUROTRANSMISSION AND RECEPTORS IN THE CNS
Some Examples of Pharmacological Targets Within the CNS
Assumed (predominant-) target
Mechanism of action
Example(s)of compounds (late-stage development or approved)
Inhibition of uptake
Stimulation of release
Stimulation of GABA activityb
Topiramate (in combinations)b
Zonisamide (in combinations)b
Several compounds in early clinical phase
MCH-receptor type 1
Histamine (H3-) receptor
Preclinical and early clinical phase
NPY (Y5) receptor
Compounds Predominantly Modulating Local Availability of Dopamine, Norepinephrine and Serotonin in the Brains
Tesofensine (Fig. 7) is a dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitor developed by the Danish company Neurosearch. The compound has successfully passed phase II clinical testing (ClinicalTrial.gov NCT00394667), in which it showed dose-dependent weight loss (112), and has just entered phase III testing (30).
Combination Therapies Based on Existing Drugs
Interestingly, two older compounds of the previously described class of compound modulating levels of mono-amines, phentermine and bupropion, are currently undergoing their renaissance in combination preparations with other existing drugs. Two of these combinations, Contrave® (bupropion plus naltrexone) and Qnexa® (phentermine plus topiramate) have already passed phase III testing. With the third combination, Empatic® (bupropion plus zonisamide), phase III testing will probably start shortly. The matching compounds in these combinations were initially developed as anti-epileptic drugs (zonisamide and topiramate) or as opioid antagonist (naltrexone). Topiramate and zonisamine are known to interact with different pathways, including GABA-ergic transmission. However, whilst GABA plays an important role in the brain, GABA-related targets do not appear to have provided practical strategies for weight management so far. The same holds true for opioids. Although there is considerable evidence that μ-, κ- and δ-opioid receptors located in the reward-related brain areas are involved in control of food intake, this has not resulted in new molecules for weight management (30). One of the explanations might be that opioid antagonists as monotherapy have a rather complex effect on eating behavior, mainly affecting hedonic components and not satiety or satiation (30). Furthermore, the opioid system has many connections and functions within the CNS, which also increase the risk for side effects when single compounds would be used at pharmacologically active doses.
Phentermine Plus Topiramate (Qnexa®)
Bupropion plus Zonisamide (Empatic®)
Bupropion (Fig. 7) has been discussed in the previous section. The combination with the anti-epileptic compound zonisamide (Fig. 8) has been reported to have higher efficacy with fewer side effects. Like topiramate, zonisamide is an anti-convulsant compound that has been shown to induce weight loss (114). It is supposed to act via mechanisms that are partly different from those of topiramate, affecting GABA, serotonin, and dopamine-regulated processes (30). In a phase IIb trial lasting 24 weeks, involving 729 obese subjects, mean weight loss with Empatic-360 (bupropion 360 mg/zonisamide 360 mg) was 9.9% and 7.7% with Empatic-120 (bupropion 360 mg/zonisamide 120 mg), respectively. The placebo group lost 1.7% of their body weight (111). In addition, significantly more subjects in the groups receiving the combinations lost ≥5% of their baseline weight as compared with subjects in the placebo group. Adverse events were similar to those reported for each of the individual drugs. This combination is anticipated to move to phase III testing soon.
Bupropion Plus Naltrexone (ContraveR)
This third combination of existing drugs combines bupropion with the opioid antagonist naltrexone and is developed by the same company (Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.) as Empatic®. Like bupropion, naltrexone is also already on the market. Synergistic effects were found in preclinical testing and during phase II studies. It has been suggested that the μ- and κ-antagonist naltrexone inhibits a negative feedback loop that limits the α-MSH response of POMC neurons following stimulation by bupropion. The resulting α-MSH then acts as an anorexigenic signal via stimulation of the MCR4 receptor (see also next section). The company has submitted an NDA to the FDA following a series of successful phase III trials that were finished in 2009. In these trials, the combination met the FDA efficacy benchmark causing at least 5% loss of body weight in approximately 50% of patients treated with Contrave-32 (bupropion 360 mg SR+naltrexone 32 mg SR) as compared to 16–18% of placebo patients. This was accompanied with improvements of cardiometabolic risk factors. The company also announced that the combination shows beneficial properties in obese persons with diabetes and obese persons with major depression (115).
Serotonin (5-HT) Receptor Ligands
The inverse relation between an increased availability of serotonin in certain brain areas and food intake has already been recognized for a long time, for example from the effects of fenfluramine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors like fluoxetine. However, due to side effects, non-selective modulation of brain serotonin levels were generally not regarded as an attractive target for weight management. During further investigations to untie the different serotonin actions to achieve better selectivity, a number of 5-HT receptors were identified as potential candidates (see (116) for review). Of those, the 5-HT2C and 5-HT6 receptors have so far delivered the most promising candidates.
The compound is a selective 5-HT2C agonist with ~15-fold and 100-fold selectivity over that for 5-HT2A and 5-HT2B receptors, respectively (120). Its efficacy has been demonstrated in a number of studies. For example, during a two-week phase II trial with 469 obese persons (BMI 30–45 kg/m2), lorcaserin caused dose-dependent weight loss up to 3.3 kg (placebo adjusted) in the group receiving lorcaserin 10 mg two times daily. The percentages of patients completing the trial who lost ≥5% of their initial body weight were 2.3, 12.8, 19.5, and 31.2% with placebo, 10 mg per day, 15 mg per day and 10 mg two times daily, respectively (120). After completing a phase III clinical trial program, the company Arena Pharmaceuticals has submitted a New Drug Application to the FDA in December 2009, based on data from 18 clinical trials with, in total 8,576 patients, which were evaluated for periods up to two years (121). However, in September–October 2010, the FDA rejected the application because of safety issues that had been found in the preclinical data files. The applicants expressed their confidence in being able to alleviate these concerns, but at this stage it is unclear what the consequences for the further development of lorcaserin are.
Another serotonin-associated target that is increasingly receiving attention is the 5-HT6 receptor (see (116, 119) for reviews). The 5-HT6 receptor is almost exclusively distributed within the central nervous system, which is rather unusual for a member of the serotonin receptor family. This is considered an advantage, as this facilitates selective modulation. The 5-HT6 receptor has also become an attractive target for potential new antipsychotics and antidepressants. Many new 5-HT6 ligands have been synthesized with different structures (119). Among these, a number of compounds have shown effects on food intake or body weight in rodents, and some have entered clinical testing. The next few years will be decisive in demonstrating the potential of this target.
Compared to 5-HT receptors and despite the role of dopamine in regulating eating behavior, dopamine receptors do not appear to be considered as attractive targets at the moment. Preclinical studies suggest that D3 antagonists can be effective in reducing food intake (122). GlaxoSmithKline is currently investigating the D3 antagonist GSK598809 for use with compulsive overeating (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01039454).
MC4R (Melanocortin 4 Receptor) Agonists and MCH-R1 (Melanin-Concentrating Hormone Receptor 1) Antagonists
The melanocortin system plays an important role in the central regulation of energy balance (123). The POMC (pro-opiomelanocortin) gene encodes several anorexigenic peptides that can activate at least five melanocortin receptor subtypes. These peptides include α-,β-,γ-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH, β-MSH and γ-MSH) and adrenocorticotropin (ACTH). Of the different receptors, the melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) is receiving considerable interest as a potential target. Several small-molecule agonists have been synthesized. See for structures for example (124) and for a very extensive list also (125). The clinical usefulness of this group remains to be established. Results with the MC4R agonist MK-0493 from MSD in humans were disappointing (126).
H3 Receptor Antagonists
Another example is HPP404 from Transtech Pharma (http://www.ttpharma.com), which is also reported to be in phase I. Many other H3 antagonists are in clinical development for indications different from obesity (128,129). The H3 antagonist SCH-497079, which was acquired by Merck&Co, has undergone phase II testing for weight management, but its status is presently unknown. The compound betahistine (Histalean®, Fig. 11), which is on the market in Canada and Europe for vertigo, has also been claimed to decrease food intake via blockade of central H1 and H3 receptors. However, consistent evidence for efficacy in humans appears to be lacking(131).
Agouti-Related Protein (AgRP)- Inhibitors
Similar to NPY, AgRP is an endogenous orexigenic protein acting in the basal hypothalamus. Consequently, selective inhibitors might also have potential in inhibiting food intake. However, there do not seem to be many candidates in advanced stages of development. An exception is TTP435 from Transtech Pharma (http://www.ttpharma.com), which is reported to be a selective inhibitor of AgRP with oral activity and high brain penetration. Following successful animal studies, the compound is currently in phase II clinical trials.
Other CNS Compounds and Targets
A possible future target for weight management could become the bombesin receptor subtype 3 (BRS-3). This is a GPCR which is widely distributed in the brain but whose natural ligand is still unknown. Recently, a group of scientists from Merck reported the synthesis of a BRS-3 agonist that reduced food intake and increased metabolic rate in mice (132).
Inhibitors of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase (PTP1B)
The compound has been in development as MSI-1436 by Genaera, who ended phase I clinical studies in 2007. Since this company has ended its business, its current status and perspective are unclear, although the compound is used as experimental tool.
COMPOUNDS AIMING TO REDUCE FAT MASS
In addition to reducing energy intake, different pharmacological approaches are being evaluated to reach weight reduction or improve health by increasing energy expenditure or by reducing or redistributing adipose tissue. The latter may be useful to change “risky” (visceral) fat into less risk-bearing fat depots. In the food supplement area, there are many preparations claiming to help “burn” fat. Although some compounds, including caffeine, ephedrine and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), have been shown to possess some activity, sustained effects are generally disappointing (37). Nevertheless, targeting energy expenditure (cellular bioenergetics), in particular adaptive thermogenesis, is regarded as a valuable option (137). Adaptive thermogenesis is generated by mitochondria of skeletal muscle and by brown adipose tissue (BAT) in response to external stimuli. Until five years ago, it was generally assumed that adult humans possess negligible amounts of BAT, which did not make this tissue an interesting option for pharmacological intervention. However, recent findings have demonstrated that adults maintain active BAT (138, 139, 140). As a result, interest in BAT as a new target for human obesity has also returned (137,141,142).
Main Classes of Compounds Acting on Local or Total Body Fat
• Beta-3 adrenergic receptor agonists
• Selective thyroid hormone receptor subtype β-agonists
• Growth hormone analogues
• 11-β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) inhibitors
• Sirtuin 1 activators
• Inihibitors of angiogenisis
• TGR5 agonists
Beta-3 Receptor Agonists
The β3-adrenergic receptor is expressed in adipocytes and some other tissues. The discovery, during the early 80s, of last century, of its role as a regulator of lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation in rodents pushed many pharmaceutical companies to start developing β3AR agonists for human weight management (141). However, clinical studies in humans did not meet the high expectations.
Some other β3 agonists, for example SR58611A (Fig. 14) from Sanofi-Aventis, are now being investigated for use in anxiety and depression. The lack of efficacy of β3 agonists on human adipose tissue has been explained by the low numbers of β3-adrenoreceptors on human adipocytes as compared to mice or the weak effect of β3 activation on lipolysis in general. Furthermore, many compounds suffered from poor selectivity and unfavorable PK properties, such as a low oral bioavailability (141). However, the recent developments in the discovery of brown adipose tissue in humans expressing the β3AR have generated new optimism (137). There are indications that treatment with β3AR agonists may increase the amount and activity of this brown adipose tissue (141).
Selective Thyroid Hormone Mimetics
These molecules possess pharmacological profiles different from that of thyroid hormone (145, 146, 147). For example, KB-141 was shown to have anti-obesity, lipid-lowering and anti-diabetic effects in rodents, without causing tachycardia. This suggests that selective TRβ activation could provide a future strategy to attenuate features of the metabolic syndrome (145). However, more studies are needed to determine the therapeutic potential of this class, and there appear to be no compounds having progressed beyond phase I clinical trials at the moment (146).
Growth Hormone (GH) Analogues
The concept of using GH or its analogues to combat obesity dates back several years. It was based on different principles, including lower GH levels and a reduced responsiveness to GH in obese persons, which is generally restored after weight loss (111). However, when combined with a hypocaloric diet, GH was not shown to have additional benefits. In combination with an isoenergetic diet, GH induced only a modest reduction in weight as compared with placebo. Furthermore, several studies reported a worsening of insulin resistance in subjects treated with GH. A modified fragment of human GH, AOD9604, has been in development for weight management. It had been designed to mimic the lipolytic effects of GH without producing growth effects. However, its development was stopped in 2007 because of insufficient efficacy during a 24-week trial with 536 subjects. Taken together, there seems to be little enthusiasm left for GH as a target to reduce body weight.
Inhibition of 11-Β Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1
Although the development of the first selective 11β-HSD1 inhibitor BVT-3498 (AMG-331) was terminated during phase II testing, several other compounds have reached the clinical phase. One of the most advanced is INCB 13739 (structure not disclosed) from Incyte (156). The next few years will be pivotal in showing whether this target will be successful. The need for selectivity and the risk of activation of the HPA axis have been suggested as potential hurdles (154).
Sirtuin 1 as Potential Target in Obesity
Following the discovery of SIRT1 and its role in metabolism, several small-molecule SIRT1 activators (some examples given in Fig. 17) have been synthesized with structures different from that of resveratrol but with considerably higher potency (159,160). A number of these compounds were reported to improve metabolic function in animal models of diabetes and obesity, suggesting that they may have therapeutic potential. For example, SIRT 1720 (Fig. 17) was found to protect mice against diet-induced obesity by enhancing oxidative metabolism in skeletal muscle, liver and BAT (161).
In 2004, GlaxoSmithKline founded Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, a company focusing on the development of drugs targeting SIRT1. Sirtris reports a number of compounds in clinical development (162). However, recently Pacholec et al. (163) suggested that resveratrol and a number of the Sirtris compounds are not directly activating SIRT1. The authors also questioned the beneficial effects of SRT1720 in a rodent diabetes model and stated that the Sirtris compounds and resveratrol are highly promiscuous compounds having multiple targets. Similar to several other classes described in this review, the coming years will show whether the high expectations are justified.
Although some investigators suggest a beneficial effect of diazoxide in obesity in combination with caloric restriction and physical exercise (164), its usefulness as a target in obesity is questioned by others (165). A controlled release formulation of its choline salt is under development by Essential Therapeutics (http://essentialistherapeutics.com/pages/products.php).
Adipose tissue is highly vascularized, and expansion requires the formation of new capillaries. Therefore, the use of selective inhibitors of angiogenisis has been proposed as a possible approach to reduce fat tissue (149,166,167). An interesting proof-of-concept study in mice was described by Rupnick et al. (166), who showed that systemic anti-angiogenic agents caused dose-dependent, reversible weight reduction and adipose tissue loss. However, an important challenge is to target adipose tissue resulting in “magic bullets” that “melt fat” (168). This principle was shown by Kolonin et al. (169) using a phage-display method in mice. Molecular targets could include one or several of the angiogenic factors secreted by adipocytes including leptin, angiopoietins, HGF, GM-CSF, VEGF, FGF-2, and TGF-β (170). One of the companies active in this area is Korean AngioLab (http://angiolab.co.kr/), who reports to develop a herbal preparation named ALS-L1023 for this purpose.
TGR5 is a G-protein coupled receptor that is activated by bile acids, including lithocholic acid and deoxycholic acid (171). TGR5 is widely expressed in the body, in particular in metabolic tissues such as liver, muscle, intestine, and brown adipose tissue. Interest in TGR5 as potential target for obesity and diabetes has been raised, since receptor activation was shown to be connected with an increase in energy expenditure, a reduction of diet-induced obesity and an increase of GLP-1 release in vitro (172,173). A number of companies have started to synthesize and test selective TGR5 agonists, with bile acid-derived or non-bile acid structures (171,174). One of these is the semi-synthetic TGR5 agonist INT-777, which was found to increase energy expenditure and reduce weight gain in mice on a high-fat diet (173). Furthermore, insulin sensitivity in obese mice was improved with INT-777. The development of TGR5 agonists is still in its infancy, and although results so far look promising, it is too early to draw conclusions on the potential of this target. There are no drug candidates yet that have reached the clinical phase. As TGR5 seems to be involved in a rather broad range of processes (171), more insight in potential off-target effects will also be needed.
The rising obesity figures and associated health complications present unmet medical needs for safe and effective new drug therapies. As illustrated in this review, a remarkably wide diversity of targets and compounds is presently being investigated. Despite the failures of the past, for example with rimonabant and its analogues, industry is prepared to take considerable risks. Remarkably, combinations of existing CNS drugs (topiramate, zonisamide, phentermine and bupropion) are among the most advanced in development. In general and in spite of the risks for side effects, CNS targets, including 5-HT, H3 and Y-receptors, continue to be considered as promising. This is amongst others due to the fact that for the time being the largest effects are expected from central intervention. Compounds acting on peripheral targets might offer advantages in terms of side effects. Apart from the GLP-1 analogues liraglutide and exenatide and the combination of pramlintide with metraleptin, peptide drugs mimicking satiety hormones have not met the expectations so far. However, better oral, intranasal, and transdermal formulations could help to enhance the efficacy of such approaches. Among the targets within the gut, those that stimulate the release of GLP-1 seem to be the most promising at the moment. Of particular interest is the GPR119 receptor. As also described in this review, the endocannabinoid system as target may see a revival during the coming years. Being an alternative to what is currently the only worldwide approved lipase inhibitor drug orlistat, the development of new lipase inhibitor cetilistat seems to be one of the least risky. Other approaches, such as MTP inhibition, need further proof of principle. The value of other potential targets in the battle against obesity, including 11β-HSD1, SIRT 1, TGR 5 and the modulation of intestinal flora, will become clear during the coming few years. Combination therapies, possibly including drug-food combinations, not only offer the advantage of multi-target therapy with sometimes higher efficacy, but may also reduce side effects and risks. In particular, for the preparations acting within the CNS, the coming years will be crucial to see whether side effects remain acceptable. Looking at the history of weight loss drugs, it is understandable that authorities will be watchful. Obesity is not regarded as a life-threatening disease, and, if effective, anti-obesity drugs will be prescribed to a large and diverse group of people. Furthermore, considerable off-label use and distribution via the Internet and other channels is to be expected. Given the high activity in this field of research and notwithstanding the possible risks for failures, it seems obvious that the therapeutic arsenal of weight management drugs and other compounds used in obesity will change considerably in the coming five years.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- 10.Han TS, Sattar N, Lean M. Assessment of obesity and its clinical implications. Br Med J. 2006;333:695–8.Google Scholar
- 11.O’Donovan G, Thomas EL, McCarthy JP, et al. Fat distribution in men of different waist girth, fitness level and exercise habit. Int J Obes. 2009;33:1356–62.Google Scholar
- 17.Fleischman A, Shoelson SE, Bernier R, Goldfine AB. Salsalate improves glycemia and inflammatory parameters in obese young adults. Diab Care. 2008;31:289–94.Google Scholar
- 23.Janiszewski PM, Ross R. The utility of physical activity in the management of global cardiometabolic risk. Obesity. 2009;17.Google Scholar
- 29.Berridge KC, Ho CY, Richard JM, DiFeliceantonio AG. The tempted brain eats: Pleasure and desire circuits in obesity and eating disorders. Brain Res. 2010.Google Scholar
- 37.Witkamp RF. Biologically active compounds in food products and their effects on obesity and diabetes. Comprehensive natural products II. Oxford: Elsevier; 2010. p. 509–45.Google Scholar
- 39.FDA. Early communication about an ongoing safety review Orlistat (marketed as Alli and Xenical). 2009. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/DrugSafetyInformationforHeathcareProfessionals/ucm179166.
- 42.Van Gaal L, Vercruysse F, Wajs E, Xie J, Ways D, van Nueten L. JNJ-16269110, an enterically targetted microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor, lowers body weight in overweight/obese subjects. Obes Rev. 2010;11(supplement s1):42.Google Scholar
- 45.AstraZeneca. Pipepline summary 2010; http://www.astrazeneca.com/research/our-pipeline-summary/. Access date August 15, 2010.
- 46.Idris I, Donnelly R. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors: an emerging new class of oral antidiabetic drug. Diab Obes Metab. 2009;11:79–88.Google Scholar
- 47.Johnson & Johnson. Pharmaceutical pipeline - recent approvals/potential filings. Selective highlights as of 7/20/2010. http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/JNJ/990821560x0x387659/f0fa5052-2cba-4402-91ab-b40b1fbd5e76/Q22010pipeline.pdf.
- 68.Fyfe MCT, Overton HA, Procter MJ, Reynet C, White JR. Chapter 9: new nonpeptide-binding GPCRs as targets for diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Annu Rep Med Chem. 2007;129–45.Google Scholar
- 70.Jones RM, Leonard JN, John EM. Chapter 7 the emergence of GPR119 agonists as anti-diabetic agents. Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry: Academic Press; 2009:149–70.Google Scholar
- 73.Arena Pharmaceuticals. APD597 for type 2 diabetes. Accessed August 20, 2010. http://www.arenapharm.com/apd597.aspx?p=2.6.
- 74.Metabolex. Metabolex and Sanofi-Aventis enter into an agreement for novel type2 diabetes treatment. Accessed August 10, 2010. http://www.metabolex.com/news/jun252010.html.
- 77.Piazza PV, Lafontan M, Girard J. Integrated physiology and pathophysiology of CB1-mediated effects of the endocannabinoid system. Diabetes Metabol. 2007;33:97–107.Google Scholar
- 81.Sink K, Segovia K, Nunes E, et al. Intracerebroventricular administration of cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists AM251 and AM4113 fails to alter food-reinforced behavior in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009;206:223–32.Google Scholar
- 82.Son MH, Kim HD, Chae YN, et al. Peripherally acting CB1-receptor antagonist: the relative importance of central and peripheral CB1 receptors in adiposity control. Int J Obes. 2010;34:547–56.Google Scholar
- 86.Fridberg M, Little PB, Cooper M, Jensen NO, Elling CE. A single ascending dose study of TM38837-a novel second generation peripheral selective CB1 receptor antagonist in health male volunteers. Obes Rev. 2010;10(supplement 1):180.Google Scholar
- 89.Ravussin E. Enhanced weight loss with pramlintide/metreleptin: an integrated neurohormonal approach to obesity pharmacotherapy. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17:1736–43.Google Scholar
- 90.Takeda. Amylin and Takeda announce decision to advance development of Pramlintide/Metreleptin combination treatment for obesity. Accessed August 15 2010. http://www.takeda.com/press/article_35851.html.
- 93.7 TM Pharma. TM 30339 in gastrointestinal disorders. Accessed August 15, 2010 http://www.7tm.com/R-D/Gastrointestinal_Disorders.aspx.
- 94.7TM Pharma. Information on Obinepitide. Accessed August 15 2010. http://www.7tm.com/R-D/Metabolic_Disorders/Obinepitide.aspx.
- 97.Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk is developing an oral GLP-1 to increase the convenience of GLP-1 treatment of type 2 diabetes. Accessed August 20, 2010. http://www.novonordisk.com/press/rd_pipeline/rd_pipeline.asp?showid=19.
- 98.Chandra R, Liddle RA. Cholecystokinin. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diab Obes. 2007;14:63–7.Google Scholar
- 109.Valassi E, Scacchi M, Cavagnini F. Neuroendocrine control of food intake. NMCD. 2007;1-10.Google Scholar
- 113.Vivus Incorporated. VIVUS announces positive results from two phase 3 studies; Obese patients on Qnexa achieve average weight loss up to 14.7% and significant improvements in co-morbidities. Accessed August 10, 2010. http://ir.vivus.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=407933.
- 115.Orexigen. Orexigen therapeutics announces that contrave(R) reduced depression scores and body weight in overweight and obese patients with major depression. Accessed August 15, 2010. http://ir.orexigen.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=207034&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1441841&highlight=.
- 116.Garfield AS, Heisler LK. Pharmacological targeting of the serotonergic system for the treatment of obesity. J Physiol (Lond). 2009;587:49–60.Google Scholar
- 117.Vickers SP, Easton N, Webster LJ, et al. Oral administration of the 5-HT2C receptor agonist, mCPP, reduces body weight gain in rats over 28 days as a result of maintained hypophagia. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003;167:274–80.Google Scholar
- 120.Smith SR. Lorcaserin (APD356), a selective 5-HT2C agonist, reduces body weight in obese men and women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17:494–503.Google Scholar
- 121.Arena Pharmaceuticals. Arena pharmaceuticals submits new drug application to FDA for lorcaserin for weight management. December 2009. http://invest.arenapharm.com/releases.cfm?Year=&ReleasesType=&PageNum=2.
- 131.Barak N, Greenway FL, Fujioka K, Aronne LJ, Kushner RF. Effect of histaminergic manipulation on weight in obese adults: a randomized placebo controlled trial. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32:1559–65.Google Scholar
- 134.Lantz KA, Hart SGE, Planey SL, et al. Inhibition of PTP1B by trodusquemine (MSI-1436) causes fat-specific weight loss in diet-induced obese mice. Obesity. 2010.Google Scholar
- 135.Roitman MF, Wescott S, Cone JJ, McLane MP, Wolfe HR. MSI-1436 reduces acute food intake without affecting dopamine transporter activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010.Google Scholar
- 136.Tam S, Saiah E. Recent advances in the discovery and development of PTP-1B inhibitors. Drugs Future. 2008;33:175–85.Google Scholar
- 141.Arch JR. The discovery of drugs for obesity, the metabolic effects of leptin and variable receptor pharmacology: perspectives from Î23-adrenoceptor agonists. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol. 2008;378:225–40.Google Scholar
- 150.Wang M. Glucocorticoid antagonists and 11[beta]-HSD1 inhibitors. Drug Discov Today Ther Strat. 2007;4:117–22.Google Scholar
- 152.Gathercole LL, Stewart PM. Targeting the pre-receptor metabolism of cortisol as a novel therapy in obesity and diabetes. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010 (In Press). doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.03.060.
- 153.Véniant MM, Hale C, Hungate RW, et al. Discovery of a potent, orally active 11Î²-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitor for clinical study: identification of (S)-2-((1S, 2S, 4 R)-Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ylamino)-5-isopropyl-5-methylthiazol-4(5H)-one (AMG 221). J Med Chem. 2010;53:4481–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 157.Baur JA. Biochemical effects of SIRT1 activators. Biochim Biophys Acta: Proteins Proteomics. 2010;1804:1626–34.Google Scholar
- 162.Sitris Pharmaceuticals. Sirtris development pipeline. Accessed August 15th 2010. http://www.sirtrispharma.com/pipeline.html.
- 164.van Boekel G, Loves S, van Sorge A, Ruinemans-Koerts J, Rijnders T, de Boer H. Weight loss in obese men by caloric restriction and high-dose diazoxide-mediated insulin suppression. Diab Obes Metab. 2008;10:1195–203.Google Scholar
- 165.Due A, Flint A, Eriksen G, et al. No effect of inhibition of insulin secretion by diazoxide on weight loss in hyperinsulinaemic obese subjects during an 8-week weight-loss diet. Diab Obes Metab. 2007;9:566–74.Google Scholar