Pharmaceutical Research

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 683–698 | Cite as

Dendrimeric Alkylated Polyethylenimine Nano-carriers with Acid-Cleavable Outer Cationic Shells Mediate Improved Transfection Efficiency Without Increasing Toxicity

Research Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Improved polycation-based non-viral DNA vectors were sought by preparing dendrimers with polyethylenimine cores surrounded by various shells incorporating structural features intended to facilitate steps in transfection mechanisms. Dendrimeric vectors were designed with (a) an outer oligocation shell, intended to facilitate DNA release inside cells, (b) a hydrophobic C-16 alkyl shell, and (c) a polycationic core, the latter two intended to combine lipid-depletion and osmotic burst endosome escape mechanisms, respectively, and were (d) attached through an a acid-cleavable linker reported to hydrolyze at endosomal pH values.

Methods

Vectors and DNA complexes were characterized by dynamic and static light scattering. Flow cytometry was used to quantitate transfection activity and cytotoxicity in CHO–K1 cells.

Results

About 5-fold increased transfection activity was obtained for a vector constructed with an outer shell of oligocations attached through acid-cleavable linkers, relative to a control dendrimer with an acid-stable linker. The most effective oligocation component of outer shells tested was spermine. Neither modification was associated with increased cytotoxicity. This vector design did not permit an evaluation of the benefit of combining endosome release mechanisms.

Conclusion

Using acid-cleavable linkers to attach an outer shell of short, highly-charged oligocations to a PEI-based dendrimeric vector substantially increased transfection efficiency without increasing cytotoxicity.

KEY WORDS

acid-cleavable dendrimers gene therapy polyethylenimine transfection 

References

  1. 1.
    Lipinski CA. Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2000;44:235–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lehrman S. Virus treatment questioned after gene therapy death. Nature. 1999;401:517–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Volpers C, Kochanek S. Adenoviral vectors for gene transfer and therapy. J Gene Med. 2004;6 Suppl 1:S164–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Check E. Regulators split on gene therapy as patient shows signs of cancer. Nature. 2002;419:545–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li Z, Dullmann J, Schiedlmeier B, Schmidt M, von Kalle C, Meyer J, et al. Murine leukemia induced by retroviral gene marking. Science. 2002;296:497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Merdan T, Kopecek J, Kissel T. Prospects for cationic polymers in gene and oligonucleotide therapy against cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54:715–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Izsvak Z, Ivics Z, Plasterk RH. Sleeping Beauty, a wide host-range transposon vector for genetic transformation in vertebrates. J Mol Biol. 2000;302:93–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kunath K, von Harpe A, Fischer D, Petersen H, Bickel U, Voigt K, et al. Low-molecular-weight polyethylenimine as a non-viral vector for DNA delivery: comparison of physicochemical properties, transfection efficiency and in vivo distribution with high-molecular-weight polyethylenimine. J Control Release. 2003;89:113–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boussif O, Lezoualc’h F, Zanta MA, Mergny MD, Scherman D, Demeneix B, et al. A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo: polyethylenimine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:7297–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neu M, Fischer D, Kissel T. Recent advances in rational gene transfer vector design based on poly(ethylene imine) and its derivatives. J Gene Med. 2005;7:992–1009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gabrielson NP, Pack DW. Acetylation of polyethylenimine enhances gene delivery via weakened polymer/DNA interactions. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7:2427–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nimesh S, Aggarwal A, Kumar P, Singh Y, Gupta KC, Chandra R. Influence of acyl chain length on transfection mediated by acylated PEI nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2007;337:265–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forrest ML, Meister GE, Koerber JT, Pack DW. Partial acetylation of polyethylenimine enhances in vitro gene delivery. Pharm Res. 2004;21:365–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thomas M, Klibanov AM. Enhancing polyethylenimine’s delivery of plasmid DNA into mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:14640–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall HK. Correlation of the base strengths of amines. J Amer Chem Soc. 1957;79:5441–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gosselin MA, Guo W, Lee RJ. Efficient gene transfer using reversibly cross-linked low molecular weight polyethylenimine. Bioconjug Chem. 2001;12:989–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Breunig M, Hozsa C, Lungwitz U, Watanabe K, Umeda I, Kato H, et al. Mechanistic investigation of poly(ethylene imine)-based siRNA delivery: disulfide bonds boost intracellular release of the cargo. J Control Release. 2008;130:57–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kloeckner J, Bruzzano S, Ogris M, Wagner E. Gene carriers based on hexanediol diacrylate linked oligoethylenimine: effect of chemical structure of polymer on biological properties. Bioconjug Chem. 2006;17:1339–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhong Z, Feijen J, Lok MC, Hennink WE, Christensen LV, Yockman JW, et al. Low molecular weight linear polyethylenimine-b-poly(ethylene glycol)-b-polyethylenimine triblock copolymers: synthesis, characterization, and in vitro gene transfer properties. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6:3440–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Knorr V, Ogris M, Wagner E. An acid sensitive ketal-based polyethylene glycol-oligoethylenimine copolymer mediates improved transfection efficiency at reduced toxicity. Pharm Res. 2008;25:2937–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shim MS, Kwon YJ. Acid-responsive linear polyethylenimine for efficient, specific, and biocompatible siRNA delivery. Bioconjug Chem. 2009;20:488–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim S, Choi HS, Jang HS, Suh H, Park J. Hydrophobic modification of polyethylenimine for gene transfectants. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2001;22:1069–75.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brownlie A, Uchegbu IF, Schatzlein AG. PEI-based vesicle-polymer hybrid gene delivery system with improved biocompatibility. Int J Pharm. 2004;274:41–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kursa M, Walker GF, Roessler V, Ogris M, Roedl W, Kircheis R, et al. Novel shielded transferrin-polyethylene glycol-polyethylenimine/DNA complexes for systemic tumor-targeted gene transfer. Bioconjug Chem. 2003;14:222–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kircheis R, Schuller S, Brunner S, Ogris M, Heider KH, Zauner W, et al. Polycation-based DNA complexes for tumor-targeted gene delivery in vivo. J Gene Med. 1999;1:111–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tseng WC, Jong CM. Improved stability of polycationic vector by dextran-grafted branched polyethylenimine. Biomacromolecules. 2003;4:1277–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kircheis R, Wightman L, Schreiber A, Robitza B, Rossler V, Kursa M, et al. Polyethylenimine/DNA complexes shielded by transferrin target gene expression to tumors after systemic application. Gene Ther. 2001;8:28–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ogris M, Walker G, Blessing T, Kircheis R, Wolschek M, Wagner E. Tumor-targeted gene therapy: strategies for the preparation of ligand-polyethylene glycol-polyethylenimine/DNA complexes. J Control Release. 2003;91:173–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang S, Xu Y, Wang B, Qiao W, Liu D, Li Z. Cationic compounds used in lipoplexes and polyplexes for gene delivery. J Control Release. 2004;100:165–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Behr J. The proton sponge: a trick to enter cells viruses did not exploit. Chimia. 1997;51:34–6.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Godbey WT, Wu KK, Mikos AG. Tracking the intracellular path of poly(ethylenimine)/DNA complexes for gene delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:5177–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Remy-Kristensen A, Clamme JP, Vuilleumier C, Kuhry JG, Mely Y. Role of endocytosis in the transfection of L929 fibroblasts by polyethylenimine/DNA complexes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1514:21–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Srinivasachar K, Neville DM. New protein cross-linking reagents that are cleaved by mild acid. Biochemistry. 1989;28:2501–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ambekar S, Gowda DC. Synthesis of heterobifunctional crosslinking reagents: w-(N-maleimido)alkanoic acid hydrazides. Indian J Chem. 1996;35B:184–6.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Garger SJ, Griffith OM, Grill LK. Rapid purification of plasmid DNA by a single centrifugation in a two-step cesium chloride-ethidium bromide gradient. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1983;117:835–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Imai K, Toyo’oka T, Watanabe Y. A novel fluorogenic reagent for thiols: ammonium 7-fluorobenzo-2-oxa-1, 3-diazole-4-sulfonate. Anal Biochem. 1983;128:471–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ungaro F, De Rosa G, Miro A, Quaglia F. Spectrophotometric determination of polyethylenimine in the presence of an oligonucleotide for the characterization of controlled release formulations. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2003;31:143–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wagner HL, Hoeve CAJ. Effect of molecular weight on the refractive increment of polyethylene and n-alkanes. J Polymer Sci A-2. 1971;9:1763–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Merdan T. Polyethylenimine and its derivatives: investigation of in vivo fate, subcellular trafficking and development of novel vector systems. Marburg: Philips-Universität Marburg; 2003.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Johnson TW, Klotz IM. Preparation and characterization of some derivatives of poly(ethylenimine). Macromolecules. 1974;7:149–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Noeding G, Heitz W. Amphiphilic poly(ethyleneimine) based on long-chain alkyl bromides. Macro Chem Phys. 1998;199:1637–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lin J, Qiu S, Lewis K, Klibanov AM. Bactericidal properties of flat surfaces and nanoparticles derivatized with alkylated polyethylenimines. Biotechnol Prog. 2002;18:1082–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Steele TWJ. Oligo-l-lysine-, dextran-, and alkyl-derivatives of polyethylenimine for the development of novel gene transfection vectors. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota; 2006.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Udenfriend S, Stein S, Bohlen P, Dairman W, Leimgruber W, Weigele M. Fluorescamine: a reagent for assay of amino acids, peptides, proteins, and primary amines in the picomole range. Science. 1972;178:871–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Weigele M, DeBernardo S, Leimgruber W. Fluorometric assay of secondary amino acids. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1973;50:352–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Suh J, Paik HJ, Hwang BK. Ionization of polyethylenimine and polyallylamine at various pH’s. Bioorgan Chem. 1994;22:318–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dehshahri A, Oskuee RK, Shier WT, Hatefi A, Ramezani M. Hydrophobized PEI coupled to various oligoamines results in efficient nanocarriers for plasmid DNA transfer. Biomaterials. 2009;30:4187–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Oskuee RK, Dehshahri A, Shier WT, Ramezani M. Alkylcarboxylate grafting to polyethylenimine: a simple approach to producing a DNA nano-carrier with low toxicity. J Gene Med. 2009;11:921–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medicinal Chemistry, College of PharmacyUniversity of Minnesota—Twin CitiesMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.School of Materials Science and EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations