Controlled Release of High Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid from Molecularly Imprinted Hydrogel Contact Lenses
- 1.1k Downloads
Current dry eye treatment includes delivering comfort agents to the eye via drops, but low bioavailability and multiple administration continues to be a barrier to effective treatment. There exists a significant unmet need for devices to treat dry eye and for more comfortable contact lenses.
Using molecular imprinting strategies with an analysis of biology, we have rationally designed and synthesized hydrogel contact lenses that can release hyaluronic acid (HA) at a controlled rate.
Delayed release characteristics were significantly improved through biomimetic imprinting, as multiple functional monomers provided non-covalent complexation points within nelfilcon A gels without altering structural, mechanical, or optical properties. The diffusion coefficient of 1.2 million Dalton HA was controlled by varying the number and variety of functional monomers (increasing the variety lowered the HA diffusion coefficient 1.5 times more than single functional monomers, and 1.6 times more than nelfilcon A alone).
HA can be delivered from a daily disposable lens at a therapeutic rate of approximately 6 μg/h for 24 h. This is the first demonstration of imprinting a large molecular weight polymer within a hydrogel and the effect of imprinting on the reptation of the long chain macromolecule from the structure.
KEY WORDSbiomimetic comfort contact lenses controlled drug delivery dry eye molecular imprinted hydrogel therapeutic contact lenses
We thank CIBA Vision, Inc. for funding this work and providing nefilcon macromers. We especially want to thank Dr. Lynn Winterton and Dr. John Pruitt for important discussions involving this work.
- 1.R. Berkow, M. H. Beers, R. M. Bogin, and A. J. Fletcher. The Merck Manual of Medical Information. Merck Research Laboratories, New Jersey, 1997.Google Scholar
- 21.J. U. Prause. Treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca with Lacrisert. Scand J. Rheumatol Supple. 61:261–263 (1986).Google Scholar
- 22.C. Delattre, P. Michaud, J. Courtois, and M. A. Vijayalakshmi. Study of specific interactions between glucuronic acid and amino acids at the interface using pseudo bioaffinity chromatography and NMR studies. Curr. Sci. 94:1279–1284 (2008).Google Scholar
- 23.J. S. Park, Y. B. Lim, Y. M. Kwon, B. Jeong, Y. H. Choi, and S. W. Kim. Liposome fusion induced by pH-sensitive copolymer: Poly(4-vinylpyridine-co-N,N-diethylaminoethyl methacrylate). J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 37:2305–2309 (2000). doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(19990715)37:14<2305::AID-POLA3>3.0.CO;2-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.J. Nichols. Contact Lens Materials: A Look at Lubricating Agents in Daily Disposables. Contact Lens Spectrum, January (2007).Google Scholar
- 30.M. Ali. Therapeutic Contact Lenses for Comfort Molecules. Master's Thesis, Auburn University, December 2007.Google Scholar
- 35.D. Cunliffe, A. Kirby, and C. Alexander. Molecularly imprinted drug delivery systems. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 57:1836–1853 (2005).Google Scholar
- 39.S. Venkatesh, S. P. Sizemore, J. B. Zhang, and M. E. Byrne. Therapeutic contact lenses: a biomimetic approach towards tailored ophthalmic extended delivery. Polymeric Materials: Science & Engineering (PMSE) Preprints. 94:766–767 (2006).Google Scholar
- 45.N. Bühler, H. P. Haerr, M. Hofmann, C. Irrgang, A. Mühlebach, B. Müller, and F. Stockinger. Nelfilcon A, a New Material for Contact Lenses. Chimia. 53:269–274 (1999).Google Scholar
- 48.J. Crank. The Mathematics of Diffusion. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1975.Google Scholar
- 49.N. A. Peppas. Hydrogels in Medicine and Pharmacy, Volumes I & II. CRC, Boca Raton, 1987.Google Scholar
- 50.P. J. Flory. Principles of Polymer Chemistry. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1953.Google Scholar