Synthesis and antitumor activity of 2-N- and 3-S-substituted 5-[2-(4-)benzyloxyphenyl]-1,2,4-triazoles and acylhydrazides
Article
First Online:
Received:
- 133 Downloads
- 2 Citations
3-Thio-4-phenyl-5-[2-(4-)benzyloxyphenyl]-1,2,4-triazoles were prepared by cyclization of the corresponding thiosemicarbazides in alkaline medium. The 2-N-substituted derivatives of the aforementioned triazoles were obtained via aminomethylation, cyanethylation, and alkylation of α-epoxides. 3-S-Substituted 1,2,4-triazoles were synthesized by alkylation with various aliphatic and aromatic halides. Acylhydrazides were prepared via reaction of 2-(4-)benzyloxybenzoic acid hydrazides with dicarboxylic acid anhydrides. The antitumor activity of the synthesized compounds was studied.
Key words
hydrazide thiosemicarbazide triazole aminomethylation cyanethylation alkylation α-epoxide acylhydrazide antitumor activityReferences
- 1.I. L. Shegal and I. Ya. Postovskii, Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., No. 3, 449–454 (1965).Google Scholar
- 2.T. P. Kofman, G. L. Uspenskaya, N. Yu. Medvedeva, and M. S. Pevzner, Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., No. 7, 991–994 (1976).Google Scholar
- 3.T. R. Ovsepyan, A. Kh. Avetisyan, S. M. Terdzhanyan, et al., Arm. Khim. Zh., 43(6), 399–405 (1990).Google Scholar
- 4.T. R. Ovsepyan, A. Kh. Avetisyan, and A. P. Engoyan, Arm. Khim. Zh., 36(5), 309–313 (1983).Google Scholar
- 5.V. Baretrias, J. H. Marriot, C. Melin, et al., J. Med. Chem., 43, 1910–1926 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.P. K. Michra, R. K. Michra, and R. K. Tavari, J. Indian Chem. Soc., 68(2), 110–112 (1991); Chem. Abstr., 115, 183200a (1990).Google Scholar
- 7.I. L. Shegal and I. Ya. Postovskii, Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., No. 1, 133–138 (1965).Google Scholar
- 8.L. I. Bagal, M. S. Pevzner, and V. A. Lopyrev, Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., No. 3, 440–448 (1966).Google Scholar
- 9.I. B. Masheika, G. I. Chapen, and S. A. Giller, Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., No. 5, 776–787 (1966).Google Scholar
- 10.E. G. Kovalev and I. Ya. Postovskii, Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., No. 8, 1138–1142 (1970).Google Scholar
- 11.E. N. Gur’yanova, I. I. Eitington, and M. S. Fel?dshtein, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 31, 3709–3713 (1961).Google Scholar
- 12.H. Zinner, O. Schmidt, et al., Ber., 90, 2853 – 2856 (1957); 93, 2035–2041 (1960).Google Scholar
- 13.T. P. Kofman, G. A. Zykova, V. I. Mandilova, et al., Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., No. 7, 997–1002 (1974).Google Scholar
- 14.M. A. Kaldrikyan, L. A. Grigoryan, R. G. Melik-Ogandzhanyan, and F. G. Arsenyan, Khim.-farm. Zh., 43(5), 11–13 (2009).Google Scholar
- 15.N. V. Kolotova, E. N. Koz’minykh, V. E. Kolla, et al., Khim.-farm. Zh., 33(5), 22–28 (1999).Google Scholar
- 16.V. O. Koz’minykh, V. E. Kolla, S. A. Shelenkova, et al., Khim.-farm. Zh., 27(51), 45–51 (1993).Google Scholar
- 17.Z. P. Sof’ina, A. B. Syrkin, et al., Experimental Evaluation of Antitumor Compounds in the USSR and USA [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1980).Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012