Creating thinking schools through authentic assessment: the case in Singapore
- 2.3k Downloads
Using Singapore as an example, we argue that schools need to equip and encourage teachers to adopt authentic assessment in teaching and learning so as to develop the students’ higher-order thinking. The importance of teaching and assessing higher-order thinking in Singapore classrooms is encapsulated in the vision of ‘Thinking Schools’ launched by the Ministry of Education in 1997. Underpinning this vision is a shift from conventional assessment to authentic assessment. Unlike conventional paper-and-pencil tests that focus on knowledge reproduction and low-level cognitive processing skills in artificial, contrived contexts, authentic assessment tasks underscore knowledge construction, complex thinking, elaborated communication, collaboration and problem solving in authentic contexts. However, the creation of thinking schools in Singapore remains a constant challenge as many teachers tend to rely on conventional assessment and are often ill-prepared to implement authentic assessment. By presenting the findings from a recent empirical study, we propose that schools build teacher capacity by providing ongoing and sustained professional development on authentic assessment for teachers.
KeywordsAuthentic assessment Higher-order thinking Professional development Singapore
- Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Case, R. & Daniels, L.B. (2002). Preconceptions of critical thinking. Available online at: http://www.educ.sfu.ca/fp/tlite/pte/tools/preconceptions.html. Accessed 7 July 2005.
- Chai, C. S., & Khine, M. S. (2008). Assessing the epistemological and pedagogical beliefs among pre-service teachers in Singapore. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 287–299). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Chan, C.K.K. & Rao, N. (Eds.) (2009). Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education. Hong Kong: Springer & Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Cheah, Y. M. (1998). Acquiring English literacy in Singapore classrooms. In S. Gopinathan et al. (Eds.), Language, society and education in Singapore (pp. 291–306). Singapore: Times Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Chew, Y. et al. (1997). Primary teachers’ classroom practices in Singapore: Preliminary findings. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Education Research Association, Singapore.Google Scholar
- Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Darling-Hammond, L., & Falk, B. (1997). Using standards and assessments to support student learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(3), 190–199.Google Scholar
- Deng, Z., & Gopinathan, S. (1999). Integration of information technology into teaching: the complexity and challenges of implementation of curricular changes in Singapore. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education & Development, 2(1), 29–39.Google Scholar
- Endres, B. (1996). Habermas and critical thinking. Philosophy of Education 1996. Available online at: http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PESYearbook/96_docs/endres.html. Accessed 7 July 2005.
- Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Feinberg, W. (1993). Japan and the pursuit of a new American identity: Work and education in a multicultural age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Goh, C.T. (1997). Shaping our future: Thinking schools, learning nation. Speech by Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong at the opening of the 7th international conference on thinking, Singapore. Available online at: http://www.moe.gov.sg/speeches/1997/020697.htm. Accessed 7 July 2005.
- Ho, A. L., & Lin, L. (2004). Students here enjoy learning maths, science. The Straits Times, 15 December.Google Scholar
- Jones, B., Valdez, G., Nowakowski, J., & Rasmussen, C. (1994). Designing learning and technology for educational reform. Oak Brook: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.Google Scholar
- Ladwig, J. (2007). Modelling pedagogy in Australian school reform. Pedagogies, 2(1), 57–76.Google Scholar
- Lim, T.K. (1996). Critical thinking and Socratic inquiry in the classroom. Paper presented at the 1996 ERA-AARE conference, Singapore.Google Scholar
- Luke, A. (2004). Two takes on the critical. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Moo, S.N. (1997). Teacher dispositions and classroom environments which support the teaching of creative and critical skills. Available online at: http://eduweb.nie.edu.sg/REACTOld/1997/2/2.html. Accessed 7 July 2005.
- Nathan, J. M. (2001). Making ‘Thinking Schools’ meaningful: Creating thinking cultures. In J. Tan, S. Gopinathan, & W. K. Ho (Eds.), Challenges facing the Singapore education system today (pp. 35–49). Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.Google Scholar
- Newmann, F. M., & Archbald, D. (1992). The nature of authentic academic achievement. In H. Berlak et al. (Eds.), Toward a new science of educational testing and assessment (pp. 71–84). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Newmann, F. M., et al. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
- Newmann, F. M., Lopez, A. S., & Bryk, A. S. (1998). The quality of intellectual work in Chicago schools: A baseline report. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.Google Scholar
- Nichols, S., Berliner, D. & Glass, G. (2006). High stakes testing and student achievement: Does accountability pressure increase student learning. Educational policy analysis archives, 14(1). Available online at http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n1/. Accessed 12 May 2005.
- Paul, R. W. (1988). What, then, is critical thinking? Rohnert Park: Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique.Google Scholar
- Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20.Google Scholar
- Shepard, L. A. (1989). Why we need better assessments. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 4–9.Google Scholar
- Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Leadership, 29(7), 4–14.Google Scholar
- Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Smith, D. C., & O’Day, J. (1990). Systemic school reform. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Splitter, L., & Sharp, A. M. (1995). Teaching for better thinking. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Sripathy, M. (1998). Language teaching pedagogies and cultural scripts: The Singapore primary classroom. In S. Gopinathan et al. (Eds.), Language, society and education in Singapore (pp. 269–280). Singapore: Times Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Stapleton, P. (1995). The role of Confucianism in Japanese education. The Language Teacher, 19, 13–16.Google Scholar
- Stevenson, W. H., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit Books.Google Scholar
- Stiggins, R.J. (1991, March). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan. 534–539.Google Scholar
- Stiggins, R. J., & Conklin, N. F. (1992). In teachers’ hands: Investigating the practices of classroom assessment. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Tan, C. (2005). The potential of Singapore’s ability driven education to prepare students for a knowledge economy. International Education Journal, 6(4), 446–453.Google Scholar
- Tharman, S. (2005). Speech by Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Minister for Education, at the MOE Work Plan Seminar 2005, on Thursday, 22 September 2005 at 10.00 AM at the Ngee Ann Polytechnic Convention Centre. Available online at: http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2005/sp20050922.htm. accessed 12 May 2006.
- Tishman, S., Perkins, D. N., & Jay, E. (1995). The thinking classroom: Learning and teaching in a culture of thinking. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Wiggins, G.P. (1989). A true test: toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan. 703–713.Google Scholar