Student Ratings and Professor Self-Ratings of College Teaching: Effects of Gender and Divisional Affiliation

Article

Abstract

Twenty female and 23 male professors at a liberal arts college participated along with their 803 undergraduate students in a questionnaire study of the effects of professor gender, student gender, and divisional affiliation on student ratings of professors and professor self-ratings. Students rated their professors on 26 questions tapping five teaching factors as well as overall teaching effectiveness. Professors rated themselves on the same questions as well as on nine exploratory ones. On student ratings, there were main effects for both professor gender (female professors were rated higher than male professors on the two interpersonal factors) and division (natural science courses were rated lowest on most factors). These patterns were qualified by significant interactions between professor gender and division. Although professor self-ratings varied by division, there were few significant correlations between professor self-ratings and students' ratings. Implications for future research are discussed.

Keywords

Student ratings College professors Gender Teaching Divisional afiliation 

References

  1. Bachen, C. M., McLoughlin, M. M., & Garcia, S. S. (1999). Assessing the role of gender in college students' evaluations of faculty. Communication Education 48, 193–210.Google Scholar
  2. Basow, S. A. (1995). Student evaluations of college professors: when gender matters. Journal of Educational Psychology 87, 656–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basow, S. A. (2000). Best and worst professors: gender patterns in student choices. Sex Roles 43, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basow, S. A., & Silberg, N. T. (1987). Student evaluations of college professors: are female and male professors rated differently? Journal of Educational Psychology 79, 308–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, S. K (1982). Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist 58, 1019–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burns-Glover, A. L., & Veith, D. J. (1995). Revisiting gender and teaching evaluations: sex still males a difference. Gender in the Workplace 10, 69–80.Google Scholar
  8. Cataldi, E. F., Fahimi, M., & Bradburn, E. M. (2005). 2004 national study of postsecondary faculty (NSOPF: 04) report on faculty and instructional staff in Fall 2003. Retrieved May 25, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2005172.Google Scholar
  9. Centra, J. A., & Gaubatz, N. B. (2000). Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching? Journal of Higher Education 71, 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D'Apollonia, S., & Abrami, P. C. (1997). Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist 52, 1198–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldman, K. A. (1989). Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external (Neutral) observers. Research in Higher Education 30, 137–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feldman, K. A. (1993). College students views of male and female college teachers: Part II—evidence from students' evaluations of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education 34, 151–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist 52, 1209–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hancock, G. R., Shannon, D. M., & Trentham, L. L. (1993). Student and teacher gender in ratings of university faculty: results from five colleges of study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 6, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hildebrand, M., & Wilson, R. (1970). Effective University Teaching and its Evaluation. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.Google Scholar
  16. Kierstead, D., D'Agostino, P. D., & Dill, H. (1988). Sex role stereotyping of college professors: bias in students' ratings of instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology 80, 342–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leventhal, L., Perry, R., & Abrami, P. (1977). Effects of lecturer quality and student perception of lecturer's experience on teaching ratings and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 69, 360–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marsh, H. W. (1982). Validity of students' evaluations of college teaching: a multitrait-multimethod analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. American Psychologist 52, 1187–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moore, A., Masterson, J.T., Christophel, D. M., & Shea, K. A. (1996). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. Communication Education 45, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Santhanam, E. & Hicks, O. (2002). Disciplinary, gender and course year influences on student perceptions of teaching: explorations and implications. Teaching in Higher Education 7, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sinclair, L., & Kunda, Z. (2000). Motivated stereotyping of women: she's fine if she praised me but incompetent if she criticized me. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 26, 1329–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Statham, A., Richardson, L., & Cook, J. A. (1991). Gender and University Teaching. Albany, New York: State University of New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentLafayette CollegeEastonUSA

Personalised recommendations