Advertisement

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 317–330 | Cite as

Parent Surveys for Teacher Evaluation

  • Kenneth D. PetersonEmail author
  • Christine Wahlquist
  • Julie Esparza Brown
  • Swapna Mukhopadhyay
Article

Abstract

Parent or guardian perceptions play a specialized role in the evaluation of school teachers. Parents are important stakeholders in teacher success, they are in some instances partners in the teachers' work, parents have unique personal information about student learning, and they can report on the teacher duties to inform parents about the classroom and child progress. This study analyzed the responses of parents to 12 survey items concerning teacher performance in 201 classrooms. The surveys were used as part of an innovative teacher evaluation program in which teachers elected to include parent feedback as one objective data source for annual review. In this study three factors emerged as important concerns for parents: humane treatment of students, support for pupil learning, and effective communication and collaboration with parents. Recommendations for use of specific survey items can be based on the empirical results of this sampling. The data gathered by parent surveys define one dimension of quality which may vary in importance from one teacher to another.

Keywords

parent surveys parent evaluation client surveys 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chance v. Board of Examiners, 330 F. Supp. 203 (S.D.N.Y. 1971).Google Scholar
  2. Davis School District. (2005). Educator Assessment System (EAS). Online: www.davis.k12.ut.us/staffdev/eas/over.htm
  3. Drake, T. L., & Roe, W. H. (1994). The principalship, 4th edn. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  4. Dwyer, C. A. (1995). Criteria for performance-based teacher assessments: Validity, standards, and issues. In A. J. Shinkfield, & D. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice (pp. 62–80). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Epstein, J. L. (1985). A question of merit: Principals' and parents' evaluations of teachers. Educational Researcher, 14(7), 3–8.Google Scholar
  6. Glass, G. V. (1974). A review of three methods of determining teacher effectiveness. In H. J. Walberg (Ed.), Evaluating educational performance (pp. 11–32). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  7. House, E. R. (Ed.) (1973). School evaluation: The politics and process. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  8. Jordan School District. (1995). Jordan performance appraisal system. Sandy, UT: Jordan School District, Utah.Google Scholar
  9. Kauchak, D., Peterson, K., & Driscoll, A. (1985). An interview study of teachers' attitudes toward teacher evaluation practices. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 19(1), 32–37.Google Scholar
  10. Lawton, M. (1997, September 17). Parents in N.Y. district to critique teachers. Education Week, p. 3.Google Scholar
  11. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Loup, K., Garland, J., Ellett, C., & Rugutt, J. (1996). Ten years later: Findings from a replication of a study of teacher evaluation practices in our 100 largest school districts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10(3), 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mark, M. M., & Shotland, R. L. (1985). Stakeholder-based evaluation and value judgments. Evaluation Review, 9, 605–626.Google Scholar
  14. McCoy, M. T. (1998, March 24). Reasons for teacher evaluation. Education Law Association, Spring Conference, Snowbird, Utah, p. 24.Google Scholar
  15. McGreal, T. L. (1983). Successful Teacher Evaluation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  16. Millman, J., & Darling-Hammond, L. (Eds.) (1990). The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Ostrander, L. P. (1995). Multiple judges of teacher effectiveness: Comparing teacher self-assessments with the perceptions of principals, students, and parents. [Doctoral Dissertation] VA: University of Virginia.Google Scholar
  18. Peterson, K. (1984). Methodological problems in teacher evaluation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17(4), 62–70.Google Scholar
  19. Peterson, K. (2004). Research on school teacher evaluation. NASSP Bulletin, 88(639), 60–79.Google Scholar
  20. Peterson, K., Gunne, M., Miller, P., & Rivera, O. (1984). Multiple audience rating form strategies for student evaluation of college teaching. Research in Higher Education, 20, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peterson, K. D. (1987). Teacher evaluation with multiple and variable lines of evidence. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 311–317.Google Scholar
  22. Peterson, K. D. (1989a). Parent surveys for school teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2(3), 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peterson, K. D. (1989b). Costs of school teacher evaluation in a career ladder system. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 22(2), 30–36.Google Scholar
  24. Peterson, K. D. (2000). Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practices, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  25. Peterson, K. D., & Chenoweth, T. (1992). School teachers' control and involvement in their own evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 6(2), 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scriven, M. (1973). Handbook for model training program in qualitative educational evaluation. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  27. Scriven, M. (1988). Duty-based teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(4), 319–334.Google Scholar
  28. Shinkfield, A. J., & Stufflebeam, D. (1995). Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Stronge, J. (Ed.) (1997). Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  30. Stronge, J., & Ostrander, L. (1997). Client surveys in teacher evaluation. In J. H. Stronge (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (pp. 129–161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  31. Utah State Code, 53A-10-101-111. (Ant. 1953).Google Scholar
  32. Waller, W. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  33. Wolf, R. (1973). How teachers feel toward evaluation? In E. House (Ed.), School evaluation: The politics and process (pp. 156–168). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth D. Peterson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christine Wahlquist
    • 2
  • Julie Esparza Brown
    • 1
  • Swapna Mukhopadhyay
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Davis School DistrictFarmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations